Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Psychology 307: Cultural Psychology Lecture 8

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Psychology 307: Cultural Psychology Lecture 8"— Presentation transcript:

1 Psychology 307: Cultural Psychology Lecture 8

2 Scoring Your Questionnaire: IISS
In order to score your questionnaire, you must compute 2 scores. Score 1: Sum of odd-numbered items Score 2: Sum of even-numbered items

3 Values What are the major value dimensions on which cultural groups vary?

4 By the end of today’s class, you should be able to:
1. define the value dimensions identified by Kluckhohn and Strodtbeck, Hofstede and Schwartz. 2. identify Canada’s rankings on Hofstede’s value dimensions.

5 What are the major value dimensions on which cultural groups vary?
Schwartz and Bilsky (1987) generated the following definition of “values”: “Values (a) are concepts or beliefs, (b) pertain to desirable end states or behaviors, (c) transcend specific situations, (d) guide selection or evaluation of behavior and events, and (e) are ordered by relative importance.”

6 A number of studies have examined the major value
A number of studies have examined the major value dimensions on which cultures vary. These include: (a) Kluckhohn and Strodtbeck (1973; see also Carter, 1991; Russo, 2000): Examined values among members of diverse cultural groups within the U.S. (e.g., Hispanics, Mormons, Navaho Indians, Texans). Identified 5 value dimensions on which these cultural groups varied:

7 Kluckhohn and Strodtbeck’s Value Dimensions
Alternative Orientations “Time” orientation Past, present, or future “Man-nature” orientation Subjugation to, harmony with, or mastery over nature “Activity” orientation Being, becoming, or doing “Nature of man” orientation Good, evil, or “mixed” “Relational” orientation Collateral, lineal, or individualistic

8 Value Orientations of U.S. Cultural Groups (Ho, 1997)
Value Dimension African Americans European Americans Hispanic Americans “Time” orientation Present Future Past “Man-nature” orientation Harmony with nature Mastery over nature “Activity” orientation Doing Becoming “Nature of man” orientation Mixed Good “Relational” orientation Collateral Individualistic

9 (b) Hofstede (1980, 2001, 2010): Examined values among IBM employees in 50 countries (e.g., Canada, China, Columbia, Germany, Greece, India, Indonesia, Iran, Israel, New Zealand, Poland, Uruguay, U.S., West Africa). Early research identified 4 value dimensions on which these cultural groups varied: Power distance, uncertainty avoidance, masculinity, and individualism.

10 Countries High and Low on Hofstede’s Value Dimensions
High Scoring Countries Low Scoring Countries Power distance Malaysia, Guatemala, Panama Denmark, Israel, Austria Uncertainty avoidance Greece, Portugal, Guatemala Denmark, Jamaica, Singapore Masculinity Japan, Austria, Venezuela Netherlands, Norway, Sweden Individualism U.S., Australia, Great Britain Panama, Ecuador, Guatemala

11 Canada’s Scores on Hofstede’s Value Dimensions
Maximum Score Average Score Canada’s Score Power distance 104 55 39 Uncertainty avoidance 112 64 48 Masculinity 95 50 52 Individualism 91 43 80

12 (c) Schwartz (1999, 2011): Examined values among individuals in 49 countries (e.g., Australia, Brazil, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, Poland, Singapore, Thailand, Turkey, United States, Zimbabwe). Identified 3 value dimensions on which these cultural groups varied: Mastery vs. harmony, hierarchy vs. egalitarianism, and conservatism vs. autonomy.

13 Values What are the major value dimensions on which cultural groups vary?


Download ppt "Psychology 307: Cultural Psychology Lecture 8"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google