Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

CPRJ2003 Systems Development Group Project

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "CPRJ2003 Systems Development Group Project"— Presentation transcript:

1 CPRJ2003 Systems Development Group Project
Report Writing Diana Musgrave Based on a presentation from the University of Derby

2 Module web site This presentation will go on the module web site:

3 Module Schedule Reminder
Week 9 Meetings with tutors. Bring feedback from user trials of product Week 10 Product demos Thurs 1 April, 4pm – final report due, with working disk/CD of your system Then peer assessment and individual essay after Easter.

4 Report Writing An important skill: In this module
During your Placement next year For your Final Year Project In your future career.

5 Report Writing A bad project cannot be made into a good one by a good report A good project can be ruined by a bad report Often a report provides important evidence of the substantial amount of work that has gone into a project.

6 Report Writing: Topics to be covered
Your report for this module Structure of a report Presentation and style Reviewing your report.

7 Final Project Report for this Module
15% of the marks for the module Detailed requirements are in the module guide Briefly: What you planned to do What you actually achieved Project evaluation A good report is likely to be at least 5,000 words, excluding appendices Report will be marked on presentation as well as content.

8 Overall Structure ¶ Title page · Abstract or summary
¸ Acknowledgements ¹ Table of contents º List of tables } As appropriate » List of figures } ¼ Report: Introduction Main body Conclusions/recommendations ½ References ¾ Appendices/documentation/user manual. 1 Title page - format - title, author, date, affiliation etc 2 Abstract or summary - covered in separate lecture 4 Table of contents - indicates structure/organisation of the report - includes chapters and sub headings 5 List of tables (if needed) - table number, title, page number 6 List of figures (if needed) - figure number, title, page

9 ????? Question ????? What’s the difference between an Abstract/Summary and an Introduction?

10 Front Pages Title page Abstract/summary Acknowledgements
Clear title, authors’names, date Abstract/summary A summary of the whole report Acknowledgements Name people outside the group who have helped you in this project.

11 Contents List Summary 1 Introduction 2 First chapter heading 3
Page Summary Introduction First chapter heading 3 2.1 Section heading 3 Sub-heading 5 Sub-heading 6 Etc References Appendix 1: Name of appendix Appendix 2: Name of appendix

12 Figures & Tables Note that “tables” here does not mean Access tables!
Figures and tables add much to a report Should be uniquely numbered and titled Cite source, if not your own work Discuss them in the text List them after your contents page.

13 Overall, and each section / chapter has:
Structure Overall, and each section / chapter has: Introduction Main body Conclusions.

14 Introduction Sets the scene for the main body. Provides the reader with a clear idea of the task being undertaken Used to state the aims of the project May include outline of work - when, where, and how the project was carried out. Additional points to be mentioned: The introduction should also give the reader the following information: Who asked for the report? What is the purpose of the report? Statement of the problems involved The scope and limitations of the investigation Methods of investigation SET SCENE IDENTIFY GAP GAP FILLER

15 Main Body See p7 of module guide – the following sections should all be included Plans Product overview How the product is intended to be used Requirements specification Methodology and justification Discussion of orginal project plan (plan in appendix).

16 Main Body ctd Achievements
Analysis and design (ERD, table types, use cases etc in appendices) Description of product (Access relationships screen print, data, user manual as appendices) Discussion of software testing (test documents in appendix).

17 Main Body ctd Project Evaluation What is good/weak about your product
User feedback (forms in appendix) Discussion of the effectiveness of your project planning (possibly include new Gantt chart in appendix) What changes would you recommend?.

18 Conclusions Summarising the findings in the main body - not new material Be consistent with previous parts of the report.

19 Appendices Gantt charts, design documentation etc as above
Appendices give extra material for the interested reader Discuss the contents of your appendices in your main text: “As can be seen from the Feedback Forms in Appendix G, users were generally positive about the system, but they also made some criticisms……”.

20 ????? Question ????? Reports are structured to make it easy to find information - which parts of reports do you think managers read most/least? Abstract/summary Introduction Main body Conclusion Appendices.

21 Reading Reports From most to least read: Abstract/summary
Introduction and conclusion Main body Appendices Findings of Windust (1983) as quoted by Hilton (1998). Break down into chapter headings - give an overall structure - know what you have to do Draft the introduction first - gives the reader a sense of direction so will do the same for you

22 So what is the difference between an Abstract/Summary and an Introduction?
The Abstract/Summary tells you briefly what the whole report says It is complete in itself, and can be published separately from the report The Introduction sets the scene for the report; it leads readers on to the main body of the report.

23 Make sure you reference other people’s work appropriately.
Plagiarism Use of other people’s work, as if it were yours Make sure you reference other people’s work appropriately.

24 Referencing Why Cite References? Citing Bibliography / References.
Avoid plagiarism Show academic background Avoid plagiarism Show context Show how it builds on other work Show academic background Citing Bibliography / References.

25 The Harvard System of Referencing (Examples from DMU library advice)
In your text: “There is some evidence (Jones, 1992) that these figures are incorrect.” or “Jones (1992) has provided evidence that these figures are incorrect.” Harvard Advantages: Author’s name and year appear in text Alphabetical reference list easy to consult Only one entry needed for each reference in text Amendments easy to make without renumbering The well known COREL (Nugent et al 1992) and ALDEP (Hales 1984) are examples of construction types. References Hales, H L (1984) Computer Aided Facilities Planning, Addison-Wesley, New York. Nugent, C E. Vollmann, T E. Ruml, J (1990) ‘A Comparison of Techniques for the Assignment of Facilities to Locations’, Operations Research, Vol 16(1), pp The well known COREL [1] and ALDEP [2] are examples of construction types. 1. Nugent, C E. Vollmann, T E. Ruml, J. ‘A Comparison of Techniques for the Assignment of Facilities of Techniques for the Assignment of Facilities to Locations’, Operations Research, Vol 16(1), 1990, pp 2. Hales, H L Computer Aided Facilities Planning, Addison-Wesley, New York,

26 The Harvard System of Referencing
In your list of references: Books: JONES, J.L. (1992) Pollution, London, Van Nostrand. Web documents: YEATES, R. (1996) NewsAgent for Libraries: Overview [WWW] Available from: [Accessed 20 January 2002]. Harvard Advantages: Author’s name and year appear in text Alphabetical reference list easy to consult Only one entry needed for each reference in text Amendments easy to make without renumbering The well known COREL (Nugent et al 1992) and ALDEP (Hales 1984) are examples of construction types. References Hales, H L (1984) Computer Aided Facilities Planning, Addison-Wesley, New York. Nugent, C E. Vollmann, T E. Ruml, J (1990) ‘A Comparison of Techniques for the Assignment of Facilities to Locations’, Operations Research, Vol 16(1), pp The well known COREL [1] and ALDEP [2] are examples of construction types. 1. Nugent, C E. Vollmann, T E. Ruml, J. ‘A Comparison of Techniques for the Assignment of Facilities of Techniques for the Assignment of Facilities to Locations’, Operations Research, Vol 16(1), 1990, pp 2. Hales, H L Computer Aided Facilities Planning, Addison-Wesley, New York,

27 Write in a Formal Style Don’t say: “We had a chat about what to do.”
Instead say: “The group drew up a plan.”

28 Review your Report Check your own work – spell check it, read it through. Try reading it aloud – does it make sense? Get another member of the group to read each section of the report and suggest improvements At least one person should read the whole report and suggest improvements.

29 We have covered: Your report for this module Structure of a report
Presentation and style Reviewing your report.

30 Further advice Consult the DMU library web site
A report writing guide by Anne Hilton and advice on Harvard Referencing are also available on paper from the DMU library.

31 End of Lecture


Download ppt "CPRJ2003 Systems Development Group Project"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google