Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Integrated Pest Management Master Gardener Program University of Connecticut 2008 Primary Author: Ana LaGrande.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Integrated Pest Management Master Gardener Program University of Connecticut 2008 Primary Author: Ana LaGrande."— Presentation transcript:

1 Integrated Pest Management Master Gardener Program University of Connecticut 2008 Primary Author: Ana LaGrande

2

3

4 What is a Pest? A pest species is one that interferes with human activities. Competes with humans, domestic animals or desirable plants for food or water. Injures humans, animals, desirable plants, structures or possessions. Spreads diseases to humans, domestic animals, wildlife or desirable plants. Annoys humans or domestic animals. A pest can be circumstantial: –Termites in forest are beneficial. –Termites in home are a pest.

5 Pest or Delicacy?

6 Pretty, yes, but environmentally disruptive. Photo: Donna Ellis

7 What is a Pest? Aesthetic pests are those whose mere presence is unacceptable. Medical pests impact health and cause economic losses that are difficult to measure.

8 Pest Categories Arthropods (insects, mites) Plant Pathogens Weeds Nematodes Mollusks Vertebrates

9 Factors That Influence Pest Status Pest Organism Environment Crop / Management system Time

10 Integrated Pest Management A system that selects the best pest control tactics while minimizing negative outcomes Biological control, habitat manipulation, modification of cultural practices, and use of resistant varieties etc. Maintains acceptable quality. Is economical. Causes the least disruption to the environment.

11 Integrated Pest Management IPM integrates all available tools for pest control. Chemicals are only applied when a pest is detected at an economically or aesthetically significant level. Two key components are emphasized: prevention and control by natural enemies.

12 IPM Tactics Cultural Mechanical Physical Resistant Varieties Biological Control Selective Pesticides Predator mites released to control European red mite in orchards

13 The “evolution” of growing plants…

14 Pesticides in the 20 th Century Early 1900s – inorganic chemicals (copper sulfate, iron sulfate) used to kill plants. Insecticide dusts (lead arsenate) widely used in crops such as cotton and apples. 1905 - First discovery that resistance to diseases (rust on wheat) is inherited lays foundation for breeding pest-resistant crops.

15

16 1926

17 “The Hartford Park Department used 30 tons or more of lead arsenate in treating the turf in Riverside Park, Bushnell Park, and that portion of Elizabeth Park containing the rose gardens. This treatment kills the Japanese beetle grubs present in the soil and those hatching out from eggs laid in the treated soil.” From State Entomologist Report, 1936

18 1914 - First report is given of resistance in insects to an insecticide: San Jose scale and lime-sulfur. 1930 -1940s - First discovery of organic chemicals that kill plants. 2,4-D used as a selective herbicide. 1939 - Paul Mueller discovers insecticidal properties of DDT

19 1946 - First report of insect resistance to new synthetic organic chemical insecticides. Houseflies resistant to DDT observed in Sweden and Denmark. 1950s - Resistance to new classes of pesticides start to appear in insect populations. 1952- 62 - Establishment of the ‘integrated control concept’.

20 Hoskins et al. 1939: seed of the idea of integrated control “biological and chemical control are considered as supplementary to one another or as the two edges of the same sword… nature’s own balance provides the major part of the protection that is required for the successful pursuit of agriculture… insecticides should be used so as to interfere with natural control of pests as little as possible…”

21 1961 - The term ‘pest management’ advanced by Geier and Clark. 1962 - Rachel Carson publishes ‘Silent Spring’. Late 1960s - Resistance to an herbicide is first documented. Also, first report of field resistance to a fungicide. 1972 - The term “IPM” formally appears in a message from President Nixon to Congress.

22

23 IPM Program Components Knowledge Base: key plants, key pests, susceptible locations Prevention Monitoring approaches: visual inspections, traps, degree-days Decision-making rules: Economic and aesthetic injury levels, tolerance levels Intervention Evaluation

24

25

26 Physical Controls: Mesh-screening in greenhouses

27

28 Monitoring: Trapping Visual –Yellow, blue, white sticky card traps –Red spheres for apple maggot Sticky traps Bait traps Pitfall traps Blacklight traps

29 Advantages of Monitoring Develops a historical record of pests and beneficials. Provides info to help time control measures properly. Provides info to help identify non-target impacts. Provides info to improve or simplify future sampling programs. Provides earlier warning to potential pest problems. Provides feedback about whether pest control activities are working.

30 Weather & IPM 1.Importance of Weather Data 2.Observing Microclimates 3.Growing Degree Days uses this equation: Maximum Temperature + MinimumTemperature - 50° F. 2 and can be calculated when soil reached 50° F and plants start to grow. 4.Forecasting & Disease Management 5.Predictive Pest Outbreak Models

31

32 IPM Program Components Knowledge Base: key plants, key pests, susceptible locations Prevention Monitoring approaches: visual inspections, traps, degree-days Decision-making rules: EIL, AIL, tolerance levels Intervention Evaluation

33 Economic Injury Level The level of pest density at which the cost to control the pest is equal to the losses that the pest causes.

34 Aesthetic Injury Level The level of pest abundance above which aesthetic or sociological considerations suggest control measures should be implemented against the pest.

35 IPM for Orangestriped Oakworm Orangestriped oakworm serious problem in urban forests in Virginia from 1981-1987. AIL defined as the lowest amount of defoliation that was tolerated by citizens and the lowest defoliation that would not significantly reduce tree health.

36

37 IPM for Orangestriped Oakworm A citizen survey revealed tolerance levels and starch analysis determined effect of defoliation on tree health. Survey indicated citizens would accept some defoliation and 25% defoliation was the upper tolerance limit. Aesthetic threshold: egg mass density that caused a given level of defoliation.

38 IPM for Orangestriped Oakworm Daily scouting and counting of egg masses per 30 cm branch segment. Bacillus thuringiensis used on early instars. Pesticide volume in 1988 decreased by 80% with a cost savings of 55%. Use of Bt conserved other natural enemies of the oakworm.

39 The 10 Commandments of IPM 1. Monitoring - Forecasting 2. Use of thresholds (where they exist) 3. Emphasize prevention via cultural methods vs. treatments 4. Record keeping / documentation 5.Use least toxic / least environmentally disruptive practices

40 10 Commandments of IPM cont… 6. Resistance management 7. Education of implementers (consumers) 8.Use of best management practices for soil and nutrient management and water use 9.BMPs for pest management - comply with legal requirements, use of appropriate tools, calibrate sprayers, pesticide applicator training, etc. 10. Use a systems approach in applying all of the above!

41 Use a regular schedule of pesticide spraying Monitor levels of pests & use IPM decision making tools Use selective pesticides Use cultural controls & other biologically based tactics Use pesticide as last resort Eliminate conventional pesticides: organic farming IPM Continuum

42 IPM Programs in Connecticut Vegetable crops Tree fruit Small fruit Field crops Invasive species Nursery crops IPM curriculum Greenhouse crops John Wolchesky, Lapsley Orchard, Pomfret

43 IPM Program Impacts Delivered 738 on-site, season-long IPM training programs since 1984. Reduced the use of pesticide active ingredients by at least 91 tons. 13 vegetable growers (299 acres) participating in the 2004 training saved $184,705 through reduced pesticide use and increased yields.

44 The Quinnipiac River Watershed Integrated Pest/Crop Management Project Orchards, vegetables, greenhouses, field corn, turfgrass and nursery/landscaping Pesticide applications were reduced by 63% (47,612 pounds of pesticide active ingredient) on 785 acres.

45 IPM Website www.hort.uconn.edu/ipm/


Download ppt "Integrated Pest Management Master Gardener Program University of Connecticut 2008 Primary Author: Ana LaGrande."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google