2.  Symbolic interactionism  Our self-image – how we think of ourselves – is shaped by interacting socially, with others  Labeling theory  We think of ourselves as others define us  As children age and becoming increasingly adventurous, their labels may go from “just being a kid,” to “a good kid acting badly”, to, perhaps, “a bad kid”  Lemert- general theory of deviance  Criminal behavior starts due to other factors (biological, sociological, social learning, etc.)  If bad behavior persists outsiders may label someone as “delinquent” and attach the social meanings of the label  Those who continue behaving poorly adopt the self-image of a delinquent  This “redefinition of self” persists independently of the original causes of the behavior

3.  Many who commit crime don’t consider themselves “criminals”  Maintaining a non-criminal self-image is important  Justifications and neutralizers used to excuse conduct ▪ “Just borrowing the money” “They can afford it” “They had it coming”  To make labels stick society applies threats and sanctions  Criminal law is the ultimate threat to one’s identity  Criminal processing is a “degradation ceremony”  Sticky labels – such as convictions and imprisonment – can make it difficult for those so labeled to reform ▪ Justifications no longer work, so persons may redefine themselves as being criminals ▪ Violators may be ostracized from conventional society ▪ Cannot obtain legitimate employment ▪ Turn to deviance to satisfy social and material needs http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=7356 334n&tag=mncol;lst;7

4.  Labeling theorists overemphasize its explanatory power  Labeling does not automatically lead to deviancy  Some deviants may actually seek out the label  If law-abiding persons are law-abiding because they want to avoid being labeled, reducing the stigma of a label may INCREASE criminal behavior  Juveniles may be more affected by what others think of them, especially their parents, than what society or the authorities think  If labeled as “rule violators” they may choose to live up to these expectations

5.  Katz – “Seductions of Crime”  Crime can’t be explained by “background” variables (race, class, etc.)  Crime best explained by examining “foreground” variables: ▪ What does it feel like to commit a crime? ▪ What are criminals trying to accomplish?  Crime motivated by the need to transcend “moral challenges” ▪ Passion killers: escape humiliating situation ▪ Delinquents: demonstrate personal competence ▪ Gang members: response to “humbling” by conventional society  Crime reinforced by the “thrill” of its commission  “Lived meanings” of organized and white collar crime  Satisfaction of “getting it over” on “marks”  Joys of thumbing one’s nose at conventional society http://youtu.be/Ur3nMiP-XV0 8 mis.

6.  Evil means to intentionally harm or degrade others  “Following orders” not an excuse  Moral imperatives to “defend the homeland” give acts legitimacy  Stereotyping and dehumanizing others removes them from actor’s “moral sphere”  Heavy situational pressures on people’s behavior blurs line between criminals and non-criminals  In 2010 the Feds convicted former Chicago police commander Jon Burge, 62, of perjury for falsely denying in an earlier civil suit that in the 1980s he and his officers extracted confessions through beatings, electric shocks and suffocation. One, Michael Tillman, was freed in January 2010 after spending 23 years in prison for a murder he didn’t commit. Police IssuesPolice Issues  Individual traits (differences between people) might make little difference  Still, some persons, even if pressured to act badly, do resist http://abclocal.go.com/wls/video?id=7912375 2.5 mis.

7.  Societies “create” crime by passing laws  Campaigns against crime are in everyone’s name, but can benefit only select groups  Economically ▪ Law against vagrancy used to create pool of cheap labor ▪ Defining drug users as criminals creates a demand for police, prosecutors, etc.  Symbolically ▪ Temperance movement reasserted Protestant values  Groups must gain power to define who’s deviant  Controlology  Criminal justice a mechanism used by State to control “problem” populations ▪ Others include education, mental health, mass media  Purpose is more than just control -- it’s “to manifest state power”  Over time rationale has shifted from crude to sophisticated ▪ Public executions  rehabilitation  Iron fist remains hidden in the “velvet glove”  Much in common with Marxist and critical criminology