Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Dollard and Miller Chapter 10

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Dollard and Miller Chapter 10"— Presentation transcript:

1 Dollard and Miller Chapter 10
Psychoanalytic Learning Theory

2 Hull’s Theory of Learning
Drive – any strong impulse that moves an organism to action Reinforcer – anything that reduces a drive Habit – association b/t stimulus and response (S-R learning) Goal: Synthesize theories of Freud and Hull Hull’s theory of learning: Drive – any strong impulse that moves an organism to action Reinforcer – anything that reduces a drive Habit – association b/t stimulus and response (S-R learning)

3 Dollard & Miller’s Theory of Learning
Drive Cue Response Reinforcement Goal: Synthesize theories of Freud and Hull Drive - what a person wants, which motivates learning Ex. hunger thirst sexual drive approval-seeking Cue: what a person notices, which provides a discriminative stimulus for learning Ex. mother calling sight of someone you love Response - what a person does, which is learned Ex. crying asking for help criticizing someone Reinforcement - what a person gets as a result of a response in the learning sequence, which strengthens responses because of its drive-reducing effect Ex. food approval

4 Response Hierarchies Habit family hierarchy Learning
Innate hierarchy of responses Dominant response Learning Initial hierarchy of responses Resultant hierarchy of responses Response hierarchies: Habit family hierarchy Innate hierarchy of responses Dominant response Learning Initial hierarchy of responses Resultant hierarchy of responses

5 Example of a response hierarchy: child
R1: cry R2: grab teddy bear R3: hide R4: demand Daddy R5: go quietly to bed Ex. R1: cry (dominant response) R2: grab teddy bear R3: hide R4: demand Daddy R5: go quietly to bed

6 gradient of reward The more closely the response is followed by reward, the more it is strengthened. Language can influence this by making a response "close" by talking about it.

7 Bandura (1925- ) & Mischel (1930- )
B got interested in personality in part b/c worked on the Alaskan highway for a summer, people working there were usually trying to escape creditors, alimony or probation officers He said it gave him a “keen appreciation for the psycholpathology of everyday life” Originally started work with children might learn aggression from parents – started him thinking about observational learning M was always interested in self-control – delay of gratification to get a much larger reward

8 Consistency of Human Behavior
Mischel’s Peace Corps study Personality Coefficient Weak correlation (.30) between standard personality tests and behavior Consistency Paradox The persistent belief that human behavior is consistent over time and situation when experimental evidence indicates that it is not In fact, Mischel believes consistency is maladaptive Mischel’s Peace Corps study - M had a job in 1060s trying to predict if Peace Corps volunteers would be successful He found out that there was only a weak connection (.30) between test scores and actual behavior (called Personality Coefficient) He suggested that this was not the fault of the tests, but that people are simply not consistent with behavior; in other words, traits can help describe behavior, but they cannot predict it Studies backup idea that people are not as consistent as originally thought In past, people had made two assumptions: - a person’s behaviors would be consistent over both time and situation - personality tests would be a good predictor of behavior Consistency Paradox - The persistent belief that human behavior is consistent over time and situation when experimental evidence indicates that it is not M even suggests that too much consistency is maladaptive, person too rigid

9 The Situational Context of Behavior
Variables affecting personality Person variables – personal traits that influence response to a situation Situation variables – environmental circumstances person finds themselves in Traditional theory overemphasizes Person Variables Skinner overemphasizes Situation Variables Variables affecting personality Person variables – personal traits that influence response to a situation Situation variables – environmental circumstances person finds themselves in Traditional theory overemphasizes Person Variables Skinner overemphasizes Situation Variables

10 The Situational Context of Behavior
Reciprocal Determinism Personality emerges from the mutual interactions of individuals, their actions, and their environments. Reciprocal Determinism Personality emerges from the mutual interactions of individuals, their actions, and their environments.

11 Imagine combinations of these behaviors: hit cry smile
With any of these situations: ... when pushed. ... when teased. ... when complimented.

12 It makes sense to “hit back when pushed
It makes sense to “hit back when pushed.” It does not make sense to “cry when complimented.”

13 Person Variables Beliefs, values, and information gathering strategies that determine which stimuli are perceived, selected, interpreted, and used Person variables: Beliefs, values, and information gathering strategies that determine which stimuli are perceived, selected, interpreted, and used

14 1. Encoding Strategies “How we see things”
personal constructs - trait terms people use to describe themselves and other people Ex. passionate, hard-working situational descriptions – how situation is interpreted helps explain why people have different reactions to same situation Encoding strategies “How we see things” personal constructs - trait terms people use to describe themselves and other people Ex. passionate, hard-working situational descriptions – how situation is interpreted helps explain why people have different reactions to same situation

15 2. Expectancies “What we think will happen”
Behavior-Outcome Expectancies Stimulus-Outcome Expectancies Self-Efficacy Expectancies 2. Expectancies “What we think will happen” Behavior-Outcome Expectancies Stimulus-Outcome Expectancies Self-Efficacy Expectancies

16 Behavior-Outcome Expectancies
If I act in this way, it will have the following result. If I study 3 hours, will I get an A ? If I run, will I catch the bus? Used when specifics about current situation unknown, based on past, similar experiences Behavior-outcome expectancies If I act in this way, it will have the following result. If I study 3 hours, will I get an A ? If I run, will I catch the bus? Used when specifics about current situation unknown, based on past, similar experiences

17 Stimulus-Outcome Expectancies
What will happen next? Learned from past experiences Stimulus-outcome expectancies What will happen next? Learned from past experiences

18 I know what to expect from this stimulus!

19 Self-Efficacy Expectancies
Can I do it? Self-efficacy – what a person can do Perceived self-efficacy – what a person thinks they are capable of doing Self-efficacy expectancies Can I do it? Self-efficacy – what a person can do Perceived self-efficacy – what a person thinks they are capable of doing

20 Self-Efficacy Expectancies
Strong emotion – low self-efficacy Calmness – high self-efficacy People w/ high self-efficacy Set higher goals Persist longer More venturesome Recover more quickly from set-backs Have less fear, anxiety, stress & depression Self-efficacy expectancies Strong emotion – low self-efficacy Calmness – high self-efficacy People w/ high self-efficacy Set higher goals Persist longer More venturesome Recover more quickly from set-backs Have less fear, anxiety, stress & depression

21 3. Subjective values (of outcome)
“What is worth having or doing?” desirability of outcomes (given the particular individual’s goals or values) 3. Subjective values (of outcome) “What is worth having or doing?” desirability of outcomes (given the particular individual’s goals or values)

22 4. Self-regulatory systems and plans
“How do we attain our goals?” 4. self-regulatory systems and plans “How do we attain our goals?”

23 Self-Regulated Behavior
Most behavior is self-regulated Performance Standards: When performance meets standards, person feels good When performance does not meet standards, person feels bad Intrinsic vs. extrinsic reinforcement/punishment I.e., most behavior is purposive or teleological Self-regulated behavior Most behavior is self-regulated Performance Standards: When performance meets standards, person feels good When performance does not meet standards, person feels bad Intrinsic vs. extrinsic reinforcement/punishment I.e., most behavior is purposive or teleological

24 Self-Regulated Behavior
Self-Efficacy as a mediator of performance Moral Conduct as a regulator of performance Self-Exonerating Mechanisms excuse violations of moral standards Self-regulated behavior Self-Efficacy as a mediator of performance Moral Conduct as a regulator of performance Self-Exonerating Mechanisms excuse violations of moral standards

25 Self-Exonerating Mechanisms
Moral justification Euphemistic labeling Advantageous comparison Displacement of responsibility Diffusion of responsibility Disregard or distortion of consequences Dehumanization Attribution of blame Self-exonerating mechanisms Moral justification Euphemistic labeling Advantageous comparison Displacement of responsibility Diffusion of responsibility Disregard or distortion of consequences Dehumanization Attribution of blame

26 Delay of Gratification

27 5. Competencies “What we are capable of doing?” behavioral cognitive

28 Examples Sexual gender identity
Knowing structure of the physical world Social rules and conventions Personal constructs about self, others Rehearsal strategies for learning Sexual gender identity Knowing structure of the physical world Social rules and conventions Personal constructs about self, others Rehearsal strategies for learning Table 12.2 (text page 360). Adapted from Mischel, 1973, p. 266.

29 Five Person Variables Encoding strategies Expectancies
Subjective values Self-regulatory systems & plans Competencies Person variables Encoding strategies Expectancies Subjective values Self-regulatory systems & plans Competencies

30 Experiment nursery school students would behave more aggressively when they observed an aggressive adult Bobo doll nursery school students would behave more aggressively when they observed an aggressive adult

31 Observational Learning
Learning that takes place when one observes and models the behavior of others Models as sources of vicarious reinforcement and vicarious punishment News and Entertainment Media as Models Observational learning Learning that takes place when one observes and models the behavior of others Models as sources of vicarious reinforcement and vicarious punishment News and Entertainment Media as Models

32 Elements Necessary for Modeling
Attention One must pay attention to a behavior and its consequences Retention One must recall what was observed Reproduction Observers must have the motor ability to reproduce the modeled behavior Motivation Observer must expect reinforcement for modeled act Necessary elements for modeling Attention One must pay attention to a behavior and its consequences Retention One must recall what was observed Reproduction Observers must have the motor ability to reproduce the modeled behavior Motivation Observer must expect reinforcement for modeled act

33 Dysfunctional Expectancies and Psychotherapy
Psychological problems result from dysfunctional expectancies Thinking you can do more than you can  frustration Believing you can do less than you can  inhibits personal growth Goal of Psychotherapy: Change perceived self-efficacy Dysfunctional expectancies and psychotherapy Psychological problems result from dysfunctional expectancies Thinking you can do more than you can  frustration Believing you can do less than you can  inhibits personal growth Goal of Psychotherapy: Change perceived self-efficacy

34 Social Cognitive Theory View of Human Nature
Freedom versus Determinism Bandura as a “soft-determinist” Freedom as options Chance Encounters and Life Paths Mind-Body Relationship Social Cognitive Theory does not accept dualism Social cognitive theory view of human nature Freedom versus Determinism Bandura as a “soft-determinist” Freedom as options Chance Encounters and Life Paths Mind-Body Relationship Social Cognitive Theory does not accept dualism

35 Critique Contributions Critique contributions


Download ppt "Dollard and Miller Chapter 10"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google