Presentation on theme: "Exploring Meaning through Organizing in Musicking John Paul Stephens May Meaning Meeting 2008."— Presentation transcript:
Exploring Meaning through Organizing in Musicking John Paul Stephens May Meaning Meeting 2008
May Meaning Meeting 20082 Presentation ‘Score’ Theoretical background: Coordination Conceptualization: Musicking Methods & Data Places of Meaning in Choir Framing attempt Questions for MMMMembers
May Meaning Meeting 20083 Introduction Dissertation work: Understanding the experience of successful coordination Context: –Complex, interdependent group task –Musicking (Small, 1998) as coordination and organizing
May Meaning Meeting 20084 Theory on Coordination Coordination in Psychology –Synchrony (Bernieri, Reznick, & Rosenthal, 1988) Coordination in Organizational Studies –Organizational Design (Galbraith, 1977; Lawrence & Lorsch, 1967) –Contingency theories (Thompson, 1967; Van de Ven et al., 1976)
May Meaning Meeting 20085 Theory on Coordination (cont’d) Coordination between individuals at work: –Relational coordination (Gittell 2001; 2002) –Energy-in-conversation (Quinn & Dutton, 2005) –Heedful interrelating (Weick & Roberts, 1993)
May Meaning Meeting 20086 Central Problem: What we (don’t) know about coordination We know ways of “managing” coordination But how is it actually experienced or enacted? Coordination depends on mindfulness of interdependencies (Dougherty, 1992; Heath & Staudenmayer, 2000; Weick & Roberts, 1993) Mindful of what exactly? Where is attention focused? Coordination also involves the emergence of a new, holistic form (Fleck, 1979; Weick & Roberts, 1993) Where does a sense of “being group” come from? How is it related to coordination?
May Meaning Meeting 20087 The psychological experience of coordination A dual characterization –Attention (to self-in-relation-to-other) –Feeling (of “being group”) A multi-modal communicative achievement Research Focus
May Meaning Meeting 20088 Conceptual Framework (Successful) Coordination involves: Individuals interrelating action mindfully, attending to the relationship between self- and other- produced actions (cf. Weick & Roberts, 1993). Individuals apprehending being of a group, a “whole” that is greater than the sum of its parts (Sandelands, 1998; 2003).
May Meaning Meeting 20089 What I mean by “work” A broad view of organizing Interrelated action to achieve collective purpose (Weick, 1979) Interest in the phenomenology (the in- the-moment-experience) of interrelating action as a collective
May Meaning Meeting 200810 Music as context Chorus as organizational form Singing in choir is most popular public arts activity (NEA survey, 1998) Almost 200-strong, community choir in Midwestern town “Best Choral Performance” Grammy winners Conductor prepares choir for other conductors, performance with symphony orchestras
May Meaning Meeting 200811 Motivation of Research Novice to choral singing and musical performance Sensitive to issues of attention and coordination; concurrent interest in organizational cognition Ethnographic methods used given my insider status and the performative nature of task.
May Meaning Meeting 200812 Research Goals Ethnography = representation of a culture [and its meanings] (Van Maanen, 1988) Cognitive ethnography = how those meanings are created; how action embodies mind; how context shapes action and action renews context (cf. Hutchins, 1995)
May Meaning Meeting 200813 Meaning in the choir How do I link meaning with my core interests of attention and feeling?
May Meaning Meeting 200814 Methods Insider/Outsider research (Bartunek & Louis, 1996; Evered & Louis, 1981) Participant-observation Semi-structured (collective) interviewing (cf. Fontana & Frey, 1994; Morgan & Spanish, 1984)
May Meaning Meeting 200815 Data Fieldnotes (8 months; 57 hours of rehearsals; 18 hours of dress rehearsals; 21 hours of public performance = 187 single-spaced pages of notes) Interviews (27 individuals, 7 paired interviews) Video (one rehearsal)
May Meaning Meeting 200816 Where to begin? What are people saying is important to them? Attention (demonstrated in fieldnotes and interviews) Feeling (demonstrated in fieldnotes and interviews) Explicit testimony of meaning in interviews
May Meaning Meeting 200817 Where is meaning in the choir? “Places” of meaning In performance/action In context of action
May Meaning Meeting 200818 Meaning in Performance
May Meaning Meeting 200819 Meaning in Performance Harmony: Meaning in “togetherness” of sound Focus on technical elements vs. engagement in emotion: Linked to performance quality Repair: Can’t “re-sing”; music comprised of related notes; obligation to audience
May Meaning Meeting 200820 Meaning in Performance Connecting with conductor: his facial expression signals performance quality; eye contact creates “shared moment” Physicality: co-located physical action; discomfort; gesturing in section self- correction; seating arrangement
May Meaning Meeting 200821 Meaning in Context of Action Role & identity: Sopranos vs. altos; Basses & sopranos vs. altos & tenors; “job” vs. choir Music as meaning-laden communication: Connection with entire story of musical work; connecting text content to spirituality/religion
May Meaning Meeting 200822 Meaning in Context of Action Social connection: making friends and being able to sing next to them; responding to conductor as coordinating center; transferral of significance of piece from conductor to singer; socializing vs. “work” of singing; getting married Seating arrangement preference and neighbor’s expertise Singer --> singer vs. Conductor --> singer correction
May Meaning Meeting 200823 An attempt at a framing…
May Meaning Meeting 200824 “Meaning of work” framing Meaning as created in interpersonal encounters (Wrzesniewski, Dutton & Debebe, 2003) In the case of the choir…meaning as created in apprehending place in collective, one’s role in coordination Similar to Quinn & Dutton (2005), where conversation helps clarify one’s place in the [narrative about] the collective.
May Meaning Meeting 200825 What is work meaning? Work meaning = employees’ understanding of what they do [at work] as well as the significance of what they do (Wrzesniewski, Dutton & Debebe, 2003). In the case of intragroup coordination, “understanding” in terms of attention and feeling.
May Meaning Meeting 200826 Construct of “work meaning” Meaning of task: unpaid, amateur, publicly performing, choral singer Meaning of role: soprano, alto, tenor, bass, manager, librarian, section leader Meaning of self in work: I can do more than my day job, I am musically “expert” or am “learner”, I can influence others
May Meaning Meeting 200827 Potential Contributions Richer, more specific views of how coordination gets done Furthering relational view of how work is done Focus on both attention (cognitive) and feeling (affect)
May Meaning Meeting 200828 Questions to MMMMembers Other views of coordination, or ways of interpreting these situations? More to “meaning” in the choir than simply “this is what is fun”? What literatures would be useful to look into now, considering the early stage of work?