1. Efficient Shipping with Low Emissions Bengt Ramne, ScandiNAOS AB
EffShip
Bengt Ramne, ScandiNAOS AB, Technical project manager EffShip
Set the scene
Explain the background
Research and development project Vinnova
2015 the conditions for shipping will change considerably
10 Partners
Develop products and systems to make shipping more efficient with lower Emissions
Förklara bakgrunden
2015 förustättingarna frör sjöfarten
Efficient Shipping with Low Emissions
Bengt Ramne, ScandiNAOS AB
test

2. EffShip – Efficient Shipping with low emissions
The EffShip project is a research and development project partly funded by Vinnova in their program for “Environment innovations”.
The projected started in December 2009 and runs for 40 months until March 2013.
 The EffShip project is based on the vision of a sustainable and successful maritime transport industry – one which is energy efficient and has minimal environmental impacts
One of the main objectives of the project is to identify the best and most effective way for the shipping industry to comply with the upcoming regulations regarding emissions
Work packages
WP1 Project Management
WP2 Present and Future Maritime Fuels
WP3 Exhaust Gas Cleaning
WP4 Energy Efficiency and Heat Recovery
WP5 Energy Transformers
WP6 System Impact when Using Wind, Wave and Solar Energy
WP7 Logistic system analysis
WP8 Demonstration of Findings
WP9 Final Reporting, Dissemination and Future Projects
test

3. EffShip – Efficient Shipping with low emissions
Partners
SSPA
ScandiNAOS
Wärtsilä
S-MAN
DEC
Chalmers
StoraEnso
Göteborg Energi
Svenska Orient Linjen
Stena Rederi
Funding
Vinnova 60%, Partners 40%
Duration
Dec 2009 – March 2013
Work packages
WP1 Project Management
WP2 Present and Future Maritime Fuels
WP3 Exhaust Gas Cleaning
WP4 Energy Efficiency and Heat Recovery
WP5 Energy Transformers
WP6 System Impact when Using Wind, Wave and Solar Energy
WP7 Logistic system analysis
WP8 Demonstration of Findings
WP9 Final Reporting, Dissemination and Future Projects
test

4. EffShip – Work packages
WP1 Project Management
WP2 Present and Future Maritime Fuels
WP3 Exhaust Gas Cleaning
WP4 Energy Efficiency and Heat Recovery
WP5 Energy Transformers
WP6 System Impact when Using Wind, Wave and Solar Energy
WP7 Logistic system analysis
WP8 Demonstration of Findings
WP9 Final Reporting, Dissemination and Future Projects

5. EffShip – WP2 Present and Future Maritime Fuels
Fossile fuel
Bio fuel
Oil
Gas
test

6. Sulphur levels Marine fuel in SECA area Euro IV Euro V, City diesel
0.1% = 1000 ppm
Euro IV
Max 50 ppm
Euro V, City diesel
Max 10 ppm

7. Sulphur levels
Presented by Sören Eriksson Preem at EffShip seminar

8. EffShip – WP2 Present and Future Maritime Fuels
HFO
LSHFO
ULSHFO
MDO
MGO
LNG
Biofuel
DME
Methanol
Synthetic diesel
Fossile fuel
Bio fuel
Oil
Gas
test

9. Where can we find alternatives to HFO?

10. EffShip – WP2 Present and Future Maritime Fuels
LNG
From natural gas
Complicated distribution and storage system
Methanol
From natural gas, biomass, hydration of H2 and CO2
Conventional distribution and storage systems
Similar fuel characteristics as LNG
DME
Similar storage and system distribution as LPG
Better diesel fuel characteristics than methanol
Gas to liquid, GTL
Multiple fraction fuel
More expensive to produce than methanol

11. EffShip – WP3 Exhaust Gas Cleaning
SOx
Acidification , acid rain
NOx
Contribute to smog and increased levels of ground-level ozone
GHG
Contributes to global warming
SCR, selective catalytic cleaning
HAM, humid air motor
SAM, saturated air motor
WETPAC
EGR, exhaust gas recycling
CGR, combustion air recycling
Scrubber
CSNOx
test

12. EffShip – WP3 Emissions SCR, selective catalytic cleaning
HAM, humid air motor
SAM, saturated air motor
WETPAC
EGR, exhaust gas recycling
CGR, combustion air recycling
Scrubber
CSNOx
Data from Eyring et al. J Geophys Res 110 (2005) - Presented by Erik Fridell
test

13. SO2 + 2NaOH -> Na2SO3 + H2O
test

14. EffShip – WP4 Energy Efficiency and Heat Recovery
Jacket water cooler 6.3%
Heat radiation 0.6%
Exhaust gas 25.4%
Lube oil cooler 4.3%
Air cooler 14.1%
Fuel energy content
100%
Insulation
Heat exchangers
Exhaust gas boilers
Charge air and Scavenge air cooler
Jacket water cooler
Lube oil coolers
Frequency control pumps and fans
Low energy lightning
Shaft power output 49.3%
test

15. ORC (Organic Rankine Cycle)
EffShip – WP5 Energy Transformers
Turbine
Generator
Condenser
Evaporator
EGB
ORC 1
Thermal oil kW
Air intake
Turbine
Generator
Condenser
Evaporator
ORC 2
Jacket cooling out
Jacket cooling in kW
Compressed
air
Air cooling HT out
Air cooling HT in
ORC (Organic Rankine Cycle)
LO COOLER
LO cool
LO cool
Compressed
and cooled air
Air cooling LT out
10 MW
Air cooling LT in
Lube oil
Central cooler

16. För avsikt att installera ombord på lämligt fartyg
test

17. 50-80% av kontiuerliga elbehovet
test

18. EffShip – WP6 System Impact when Using Wind, Wave and Solar Energy
Vind
test

19. EffShip – WP6 System Impact when Using Wind, Wave and Solar Energy
test

20. EffShip – WP6 System Impact when Using Wind, Wave and Solar Energy
test

21. EffShip – WP7 Logistic system analysis
Short sea
Deep sea
Roro
Volumes
Liner service – tramp
Frequency
Ship size
Ship speed
Route planning
Contract size
Contract conditions
Demurrage
Cargo handling speed
Container
Tank
Bulk
Systemanalys
Jämföra de tekniska åtgärderna med systemopyimering
Compare the technical measures versus system optimization
test

22. EffShip – WP7 Order of relevance Logistic system
Utilization of ship
Selection of main parameters
Capacity and speed
Cargo handling
Time in port, speed at sea
Operation routines
Speed profile, weather routing
Hull shape
Propeller size and propeller design
Main engine selection
Energy preservation and recovery
Systemanalys
Jämföra de tekniska åtgärderna med systemopyimering
Compare the technical measures versus system optimization
test

23. EffShip – WP8 Demonstration of Findings
Findings from WP 2 to WP7 to be implemented in the design of
DWT Short sea roro
DWT Product tanker
Platoforms to apply the developed technology
Platformar för att applicerqa den utvecklade tekniken
Very much work in the different work packages is dependant on the fuel
test

24. EffShip Expected results
Identification and quantification of the best alternatives to HFO operation
Detailed knowledge of cost and complexity for the installation and retrofitting of the best alternatives for exhaust gas cleaning
Detailed mapping of actual energy use and saving potential in short sea and deep sea shipping operation
Detailed knowledge of cost and complexity for the installation and retrofitting of the and organic rankine cycle, ORC generator
Conceptual design and performance prediction of most promising wind assistance system

25. EffShip Expected spin off projects The methanol alternative
Large scale production for marine fuel
Distribution system for marine fuel
On board arrangement of tanks
Methanol to DME reformation
Development of an online process
Methanol and DME operation
Engine modifications
Engine performance
Small scale flexible intermodal LNG transport and distribution system
development of prototypes
SOx scrubber
Installation of full scale prototype
ORC generator
Wind assistance system
Conceptual design and performance prediction
1/5 scale prototype installation

26. EffShip
EffShip projektet har som sin uttalade målsättning att konkret bidra till sjöfartens utveckling vad det gäller bästa möjliga energieffektivitet och minsta möjliga miljöpåverkan.
Deltagarna i Effship: SSPA, ScandiNAOS, Wärtsilä, S-MAN, DEC, Chalmers Tekniska Högskola, StoraEnso, Göteborg Energi, Svenska Orient Linjen, Stena Rederi representerar de flesta sektorer inom sjöfarten.
Bredden från design, akademi och underleverantörer via rederi till lastägare ger projektet en unik möjlighet att både ha helhetsperspektivet – bredden och detaljkompetensen – djupet, för att ta fram konkreta lösningar som för utvecklingen framåt.

27. Thank you Excited and Great expectations
Managed to get together a number of very knowledgeable, interesting distinguished speakers
Förväntansfull inför resten av dagen
Välkomponerad talarlista med
Unik möjligheten att få ta del av bränsleproblematiken från olika perspektiv
test

28. Sulphur
Svavel
test

30. Emission control area (SECA + NECA) Europe
test

31. Emission control area (SECA + NECA) Proposal for North America
test

32. Global energy use TWh

33. Global marine fuel oil consumption 4000 TWh or 330 000 000 ton
2.8% of global energy use
3.5% of global fosil fuel use
8.5% of global oil use
Sources:
JRC reference report Regulating Air Emissions from Ships, The State of the Art on Methodologies,Technologies and Policy Options
IMO 2009 expert estimate

34. EffShip – WP5 Energy Transformers
Steam turbine
Turbo compound
Organic Rankine Cycle, ORC
Absorption chiller
Generators
Power take in, PTI
Heat pumps
Högsbo kraftvärme verk
3 naturgas dieslar 12MW el, 15 MW värme
Organic rankine cycle
test

35. Marine fuel consumption, bio fuel production
StoraEnso marine transport system
8 vessels
ton HFO per year, 1.2 TWh
Total biofuel production in Sweden 2008
4.4 TWh
Gothenburg Biomass Gasification Project, GoBiGas
Planned production TWh
Målet är att Sverige år 2030 ska ha en fordonsflotta som är oberoende av fossila bränslen.

36. EffShip – Energy Efficiency and Heat Recovery
PDF
DWG