Presentation on theme: "Mathieu Lucquiaud, Hannah Chalmers, Jon Gibbins"— Presentation transcript:
1 Mathieu Lucquiaud, Hannah Chalmers, Jon Gibbins UKCCSC meeting,Nottingham University,18/04/2007Ongoing work within the Mechanical Engineering Department, Imperial College, LondonMathieu Lucquiaud, Hannah Chalmers, Jon Gibbins
2 INTRODUCTIONThe first generation of full-scale CCS plants is likely going to be built within the next 5-10 years worldwide.The EU has announced indicative targets : 12 CCS plants before 2015, CCS becomes routine by 2020.Some of these plants will be built in the UK and will start to operate with capture byBut most plants to be built worldwide before 2020 will operate for a significant part of their life without CCS.Some answers to the issues associated with CCS in the power plant industry?
3 PERFORMANCE OF PULVERISED COAL PLANTS WITH CO2 POST-COMBUSTION CAPTURE (1) Reduce the energy penalty associated with CO2 capture1/3 of this penalty => CO2 compression2/3 of this penalty => Solvent regeneration by taking steam from the steam turbinesFor a power plant user: steam is electricity and electricity is moneyBetter integration of the CO2 capture plant with the turbines/steam cycle is required
4 PERFORMANCE OF PULVERISED COAL PLANTS WITH CO2 POST-COMBUSTION CAPTURE (2) How a tight integration affect the operability of the plant?For the first generation of CCS plant the operability of the capture plant is likely to be low during the 1st years of operationThese plants have to be able to operate without CO2 capture to keep the lights on !!!Consequences on plant/turbine/steam cycle design
5 CAPTURE-READY POWER PLANTS (1) Plants which have the ability to include CO2 capture when the necessary regulatory or economic drivers are in placeObjective:1. avoid the risk of “stranded” assets for the power plant industry2. avoid consequent carbon lock-in for societyMinimal requirements:1. Inclusion of sufficient space and access for the additional plant2. Identification of a reasonable route towards CO2 storage=> IEA GHG report on capture-ready power plants to be released in 2007
6 CAPTURE-READY POWER PLANTS (2) For post-combustion capture some pre-investments in the steam cycle can be economically justified and allow to operate the plant:1. with similar performance to standards units without CCS2. with close performances to new-build CCS units3. with a reduced retrofit time/plant outage4. without capture after retrofit if requiredFacing the uncertainty of technology developments1.Oxyfuel or post-combustion capture-ready for pulverised coal power plants2. Design for a solvent with advanced performance but retrofit with post-combustion capture with today available solvent
7 PART-LOAD PERFORMANCE Fossil-fuelled power plants are used to follow electricity seasonal/daily variation.Increasing integration of intermittent renewable electricity sources within the gridPulverised coal power plants are likely to be operated more often at part-load in future. Reactivity to electricity demand variation is going to become a key issue.No existing data of coal plants with CO2 capture operated at part-load=> Potential for flexible operation of pulverised coal power plants with CO2 capture, Conference paper to be presented in 2007
8 ENHANCED FLEXIBILITY with post-combustion capture(1) It is possible to improve the value of plants with CO2 capture by delaying/altering the energy penalty associated with post-combustion capture.Electricity selling price varies seasonally but also daily.Selling electricity when people turn their kettles on is highly profitable!!Solvent storage/CO2 venting can be used to alter/delay the energy penalty associated with CO2 captureIt can increase plant electricity output by approximately 20% when required for post-combustion captureInitial Assessment of Flexibility of Pulverised Coal Fired Power Plants with CO2 Capture, Conference paper to be presented in 2007
9 ENHANCED FLEXIBILITY with post-combustion capture(2) It is done by by-passing the solvent reboiler and switching off the CO2 compression train for a short period.Solvent storage + delayed regeneration has no additional CO2 emissionsEconomic trade-off between solvent storage + delayed regeneration and CO2 venting. Possible additional revenues for power plant users depending on CO2 prices and electricity selling prices.Performance when storing/regenerating solvent needs has been partially characterised at Imperial=> Initial evaluation of the impact of post-combustion capture of carbon dioxide on supercritical pulverised coal power plant part load performance, Fuel, 2007
10 FURTHER WORK within the next 6-12 months Characterise plant performance at part-load and with varying levels of CO2 captureDevelop model of the post-combustion capture plant=> New DTI project + BCURA (British Coal Utilisation Research Association) project with Chemical Engineering Department at Imperial CollegeCo-combustion of biomass + coal.=> BCURA projectDevelop techno-economic methods to value flexibility of power plantsCCS deployment option, including in China=> Near Zero Emission in China (NZEC) project
12 CO2 compressed for transport turbine islandSTORAGE TANK 2to stackSCRUBBERSTRIPPERFLUE GAS COOLERSOLVENT REBOILERSTORAGE TANK 1CO2 compressed for transportturbine islandSteam from turbine islandCooling watersolventSteam cycle condensateCondensate from CO2Flue gasCO2
13 Boiler Reheater Valve 1 Valve 2 Generator Heat Recovery from CO2 Plant HPIPLPLPHeat Recovery from CO2 PlantReheaterCondenserSprayHeat to Solvent Reboiler
Your consent to our cookies if you continue to use this website.