Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

KSF Communication - Level 3 or 4 accomplice.uk.com

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "KSF Communication - Level 3 or 4 accomplice.uk.com"— Presentation transcript:

1 KSF Communication - Level 3 or 4 accomplice.uk.com
Conflict Management KSF Communication - Level 3 or 4 accomplice.uk.com br1.4.1-conflict management

2 br1.4.1-conflict management
Welcome br1.4.1-conflict management

3 br1.4.1-conflict management
Aim To increase our ability to recognise and positively deal with conflict situations br1.4.1-conflict management

4 br1.4.1-conflict management
Programme Welcome Aim and Programme Recap (Team to advise on progress since last event) Conflict – Definition; Symptoms and Causes Natural Styles in Conflict Situations Dealing with Conflict – Best Practice Review & Evaluation br1.4.1-conflict management

5 Your Personal Objective
br1.4.1-conflict management

6 Feedback on Team Actions Since the Team Time Out
Recap Feedback on Team Actions Since the Team Time Out br1.4.1-conflict management

7 br1.4.1-conflict management
What is conflict? br1.4.1-conflict management

8 br1.4.1-conflict management
Programme Welcome Aim and Programme Recap (Team to advise on progress since last event) Conflict – Definition; Symptoms and Causes Natural Styles in Conflict Situations Dealing with Conflict – Best Practice Review & Evaluation br1.4.1-conflict management

9 br1.4.1-conflict management
A competition among parties to change or maintain their relative positions of power and resources with respect to one or more issues. Judy Bradt br1.4.1-conflict management

10 Being able to work with others is one of the most sought after skills
Being able to relate to colleagues is essential for everyone KSF Communication - Level 3 or 4 br1.4.1-conflict management

11 How would you recognise conflict?
Symptoms of Conflict How would you recognise conflict? br1.4.1-conflict management

12 br1.4.1-conflict management
Symptoms of Conflict 1 Ideas or suggestions attacked before a fair hearing (including facilitator’s) Comments made with vehemence Subtle attacks at a personal level Accusations “you don’t understand x, y, z” Contributions are ignored or talked over Selective hearing (distortion) of another’s views br1.4.1-conflict management

13 br1.4.1-conflict management
Symptoms of Conflict 2 Selective hearing (distortion) of another’s views Atmospheres of impatience, discomfort Body language – aggressive, avoidance, withdrawal People state the group is too large, small, wrong people Doesn’t have the right expertise, authority to achieve its task People take sides and refuse to move from their positions br1.4.1-conflict management

14 br1.4.1-conflict management
Causes of Conflict br1.4.1-conflict management

15 Case Study Reflect on scenario (s) in which there has been or is conflict Who is in conflict – and why? What is causing the conflict? br1.4.1-conflict management

16 Sources of Conflict In the conflict scenario you describe,
what caused the conflict to happen? What other things cause conflict? br1.4.1-conflict management

17 br1.4.1-conflict management
Sources of Conflict 1 Difficult or impossible task Powerless to make or influence decisions Inadequate problem-solving methods and tools Inadequate decision-making methods br1.4.1-conflict management

18 br1.4.1-conflict management
Sources of Conflict 2 Power or status issues within the group that have not been resolved Outside interests conflict with the group’s Apathy created by a few members Personality differences br1.4.1-conflict management

19 Maslov’s Hierarchy of Needs
A.H. Maslov, A Theory of Human Motivation, Psychological Review 50 (1943): br1.4.1-conflict management

20 br1.4.1-conflict management
Cause of Conflict Conflict is based around two independent variables Conflict styles (and a road map) comes from knowing how assertive or cooperative a person/group is The inventory assesses five dimensions of behaviour br1.4.1-conflict management

21 br1.4.1-conflict management
"Don't just focus on what you want to say. “Most misunderstandings arise because of how you say it." br1.4.1-conflict management

22 Thomas Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument [TKI]
Increasingly assertive Competing (win – lose) Collaboration (win – win) Increasingly cooperative Compromising (partial win- partial lose) Avoiding (lose – lose) Accommodating (lose - win) br1.4.1-conflict management

23 Assertiveness & Rights
To be assertive, one must be clear about their (and others) rights while communicating. The five basic rights of every individual: You have the right to do anything as long as it does not hurt someone. You have the right to maintain your dignity by being assertive - even if it hurts someone else (provided you are not intentionally trying to hurt them i.e. being aggressive). You have the right to make a request from someone, as long as you recognize that the other person has the rights to say no. In many interpersonal situations the rights aren't clear. But you always have the right to discuss the problem with the persons involved, to clarify it. You have the rights to your rights. br1.4.1-conflict management

24 br1.4.1-conflict management
Programme Welcome Aim and Programme Recap (Team to advise on progress since last event) Conflict – Definition; Symptoms and Causes Natural Styles in Conflict Situations Dealing with Conflict – Best Practice Review & Evaluation br1.4.1-conflict management

25 br1.4.1-conflict management
Natural Styles Teddy Bear “Smoothing” Owl “Confronting” Fox “Compromising” Low Importance R E L A T I O N S H I P S High Importance Turtle “Withdrawing” Shark “Forcing” Low Importance G O A L S High Importance br1.4.1-conflict management

26 br1.4.1-conflict management

27 br1.4.1-conflict management
TURTLE WITHDRAWING SHARK FORCING ‘TEDDY’ SMOOTHING FOX COMPROMISING OWL CONFRONTING 15 17 20 23 29 2 13 24 27 33 3 19 18 22 4 5 br1.4.1-conflict management

28 br1.4.1-conflict management
Natural Styles Teddy Bear “Smoothing” Owl “Confronting” 1= [1] 5 Fox “Compromising” Low Importance R E L A T I O N S H I P S High Importance Turtle “Withdrawing” Shark “Forcing” [4] Low Importance G O A L S High Importance br1.4.1-conflict management

29 Thomas Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument [TKI]
Increasingly assertive Competing (win – lose) Collaboration (win – win) Increasingly cooperative Compromising (partial win- partial lose) Avoiding (lose – lose) Accommodating (lose - win) br1.4.1-conflict management

30 TKI Process – Individual Practice
Individual use of the TKI Examine the 5 modes Discuss how your behaviour differs from the group Suggest how your style may be affecting your current relationships Propose strategies for improvement br1.4.1-conflict management

31 TKI Process – Facilitators Practice
e.g. analyse and select the appropriate conflict-handling method for a situation: Conflict and change management Enhancing communication Performance improvement Stress management Team building br1.4.1-conflict management

32 br1.4.1-conflict management
Programme Welcome Aim and Programme Recap (Team to advise on progress since last event) Conflict – Definition; Symptoms and Causes Natural Styles in Conflict Situations Dealing with Conflict – Best Practice Review & Evaluation br1.4.1-conflict management

33 A Continuum of Approaches
Simple discussion between people to negotiate and issue on their own with no outside assistance Adjudication – conflicted parties abide, by law, to the decision of a third party (a judge) who bases her decision on legal precedents Conflicting parties have decreasing control over the process and outcome Dugan, A Nested Theory of Conflict (Leadership Journal, 1999) br1.4.1-conflict management

34 Implications for Facilitators & Groups
Assist parties keep track of ideas and suggestions – resurrect useful ones Formal role of mediator to guide and support a voluntary dialogue – without authority to enforce or impose a solution Focus on drawing out parties’ ideas and help them evaluate their suitability ‘Third-party’ role – and suggest solutions Increasingly directive br1.4.1-conflict management

35 Dealing with Group Conflict
State what you see going on Ask for confirmation Ask the group members to diagnose what is happening Ask for suggestions about what to do Work to reach agreement Ensure the agreement is acted upon by both parties br1.4.1-conflict management

36 Resolving Conflict NIS ONE
Ensure the needs of each party are understood Ensure both understand the impact of each party’s position upon the other Clarify the source of the conflict Identify and quality the options (and resources) required for resolution Negotiate towards resolution: listen, learn, seek flexibilities: Room to move Middle ground win-win situations Ensure resolution is experienced br1.4.1-conflict management

37 br1.4.1-conflict management
Gaining Agreement (1) Check you understand their perspective:- Invite the other person to explain their views Listen Repeat their views back to them Invite the them to confirm you have heard. If misunderstanding continues, repeat a-d again br1.4.1-conflict management

38 br1.4.1-conflict management
Gaining Agreement (2) Check you have explained your perspective so that they understand it:- Ask other person to allow you to explain your views – and gain agreement! Explain your views Ask them to repeat your views back to you Confirm that they have understood correctly If misunderstanding continues, repeat a-d again br1.4.1-conflict management

39 br1.4.1-conflict management
Conflict Resolution Role Play br1.4.1-conflict management

40 br1.4.1-conflict management
Programme Welcome Aim and Programme Recap (Team to advise on progress since last event) Conflict – Definition; Symptoms and Causes Natural Styles in Conflict Situations Dealing with Conflict – Best Practice Review & Evaluation br1.4.1-conflict management

41 br1.4.1-conflict management
Review br1.4.1-conflict management

42 br1.4.1-conflict management
Evaluation CPD br1.4.1-conflict management

43 br1.4.1-conflict management
Close br1.4.1-conflict management

44 Assertiveness - Definition
To be able to interact with people while standing up for your rights. Being assertive is to one's benefit most of the time but it does not mean that you always gets what you want. The result of being assertive is that you feel good about yourself other people know how to deal with you and there is nothing vague about dealing with you. Adapted from Winkipedia br1.4.1-conflict management

45 Assertiveness - Characteristics
They feel free to express their feelings, thoughts, and desires. They know their rights. They have control over their emotions – including anger. It does not mean that they repress their feelings. It means that they control them for at difficult moments and can then talk about it later in a logical way. They have a good understanding of (and care for) the feelings of the person with whom they are communicating. br1.4.1-conflict management

46 Assertiveness Techniques
The Broken Record repeating your requests every time you are met with illegitimate resistance However, a disadvantage with this technique is that when resistance continues, your requests lose power every time you have to repeat them. If the requests are repeated too often it can backfire on the authority of your words. In these cases it is necessary to have some sanctions on hand. Fogging Find some limited truth to agree with in what an antagonist is saying Agree in part or agree in principle. Negative inquiry request further, more specific criticism. Negative assertion agreement with criticism without letting up demand ‘I’ statements voice one's feelings and wishes without expressing a judgment about the other person or blaming one's feelings on them. br1.4.1-conflict management

47 br1.4.1-conflict management
A person is aggressive when they impose their will onto another person and tries to force them to submit. Examples of aggressive behaviour are fighting, accusing, threatening, and a general disregard for the other persons feeling. Aggression is about dominance. People behave passively when they let others push them around, when they do not stand up for themselves, and when they do what they are told regardless of how they feel about it. Passivity is about submission. Nobody likes being dominated, but it might seem like the smart thing to do at the time (perhaps to avoid disagreement or confrontation). Assertiveness is about finding the middle path. We behave assertively when we stand up for ourselves (when required), express our true feelings, and do not let others take advantage of us while, at the same time, being considerate of others' feelings. Assertivness is not about simply choosing between an aggressive or passive style of communication. It's about respecting the rights (personal boundaries) and feelings of others and expecting others to respect your rights and feelings too. If someone doesn't respect your rights and feelings, you communicate it to them. It isn't about scoring points or getting even by lashing out at them (aggressive) or feeling hurt and not talking about it so as to not embarrass the other person (passive). - for self and others. br1.4.1-conflict management

48 br1.4.1-conflict management
Assertiveness training emphasizes that to be assertive, one must be clear about their (and others) rights while communicating. The five basic rights of every individual: You have the right to do anything as long as it does not hurt someone. You have the right to maintain your dignity by being assertive - even if it hurts someone else (provided you are not intentionally trying to hurt them i.e. being aggressive). You have the right to make a request from someone, as long as you recognize that the other person has the rights to say no. In many interpersonal situations the rights aren't clear. But you always have the right to discuss the problem with the persons involved, to clarify it. You have the rights to your rights. br1.4.1-conflict management

49 Assertive Behaviour - Characteristics
Openess implies being clear and specific about what you want, think and feel. A lack of openness often leads to misunderstanding. "I didn't like that movie", "I feel irritated when you show up late", "I want to eat Chinese. Can we get Chinese?" are statements that are clear and unlikely to be misinterpreted. Directness means addressing the person / situation directly. For example, if you are in a group and want to say something to someone, communicate directly with that person instead of addressing the whole group and hoping that the person gets the message. Or, if you want your husband to get you vegetables from the supermarket, address it directly, "Will you please get a packet of frozen peas from the supermarket?" instead of asking, "Will you, by any chance, be going out today?". Honesty in communication implies that you be truthful and not mislead the other person. Example: your friend says, "I don't like your hairstyle" and you reply, "Yes, I don't too" when in fact you actually do. When we aren't honest, we deprive the other person a chance to get to understand and know us better. Appropriateness implies taking the social and cultural context into consideration before communicating. Asking out a girl in a bar might be appropriate, but trying to get a date with a widow on her husbands funeral can certainly get you into trouble. In other words, don't forget your manners! br1.4.1-conflict management

50 br1.4.1-conflict management
Becoming Assertive Understand the basic concepts Practice non-verbal cues: Stand straight ; Make eye contact; Speak loud enough Practice Verbal Responses: saying yes or no, when we want to ask favours and make requests communicate our feelings and thoughts in an open and direct way handle put downs Learn adaptive behaviours in job situations the ability to form and maintain a social network develop close, personal relationships br1.4.1-conflict management


Download ppt "KSF Communication - Level 3 or 4 accomplice.uk.com"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google