Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Lecture 5b) Selection. 3. SELECTING CANDIDATES "… predicting which candidate(s) will make the most appropriate contribution to the organisation - now.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Lecture 5b) Selection. 3. SELECTING CANDIDATES "… predicting which candidate(s) will make the most appropriate contribution to the organisation - now."— Presentation transcript:

1 Lecture 5b) Selection

2 3. SELECTING CANDIDATES "… predicting which candidate(s) will make the most appropriate contribution to the organisation - now & in the future" (Hackett, 1991) – Traditionally, focuses on candidates who ‘fit’ – Assumed to predict future performance 2 key technical requirements underpin selection: "any measuring instrument …. used in a selection procedure must be both valid and reliable" (Arnold et al, 1991)

3 2 KEY SELECTION PRINCIPLES 1) RELIABILITY Refers to consistency of methods – Does instrument / method give same result if used to assess person on more than one occasion? 2) VALIDITY Method should assess the characteristic / ability it claims to and Method should predict future job performance / behaviour it's required to (or assumed to) predict

4 SELECTION METHODS - ‘THE CLASSIC TRIO’ 1) Application Form 2 Roles: – Weed applicants at screening stage – Used to structure interview – Background & motivational info – Standardised response – reliability 2) References Used by 97% of orgs (IRS, 1991) Variety of quality of response Agenda of referee a consideration Limit spurious applicant claims Factual info essential / opinions less reliable (Armstrong, 1991; CIPD, 2005) Written v. oral references Data Protection / ethical aspects

5 SELECTION METHODS - ‘THE CLASSIC TRIO’ 3) Selection Interview "…. controlled conversation with a purpose" (Torrington & Hall, 1995) Most common selection technique in UK (IRS, 1997) 71% of UK orgs (Brewster & Hegewisch, 1994)

6 SELECTION METHODS - ‘THE CLASSIC TRIO’ But, Accuracy of Interview Data / Predicted Job Performance Questioned Correlation co-efficient: 0 = chance prediction 1.0 = perfect prediction Unstructured interviews 0.3 prediction whereas….. Structured interviews 0.62 prediction (Anderson & Shackleton, 1993)

7 PROBLEMS WITH INTERVIEW VALIDITY / RELIABILITY Validity Problems: – Contrived situation, strangers, time – Restraints, artificial and stressful situation – Cannot test the important areas: – Competence – Co-operation – Self-development – Potential for wider responsibilities – Assesses competence at interviews (not in the job) Reliability Problems: – No two interviewers will interpret / assess info exactly the same way – Same interviewer will vary over time

8 PROBLEMS WITH INTERVIEW VALIDITY / RELIABILITY Potential Results? Subjectivity / biases / halo and horn effects Reliance on first impressions Reasons to reject applicants sought So, Why are Interviews Common? 'Face' validity / acceptability Flexibility Face-to-face meeting / see if candidate will fit in / give them positive impression of organisation Supply / help check / clarify / explore information

9 PROBLEMS WITH INTERVIEW Artificial, contrived, superficial situation Interviewer(s) in potentially more powerful situation

10 USING THE INTERVIEW EFFECTIVELY Pre-Interview Preparation/Planning Use job analysis for performance requirements / criteria and assessment Structure the interview – biographical, situational, behavioural / competency approach(es) Consider other complementary selection methods also Decide if one-to-one / panel interview – pros and cons Decide on number of interviewers, prepare and brief accordingly Consider environmental / room details Produce coverage plan / consider questions / structure the interview

11 USING THE INTERVIEW EFFECTIVELY The Interview Itself Establishing rapport Logical structure / approach Interviewers taking turns to ask questions Questioning: – Open (should predominate) – Probing – Closed to clarify and summarise – Avoid leading & hypothetical questions Listening to answers / observing non-verbal behaviour Awareness of own non-verbal behaviour Control of interview Note-taking / use of checklist Summarising Ending clearly and pleasantly Welcoming interviewee questions

12 USING THE INTERVIEW EFFECTIVELY Post-Interview Assessment and Decision Assess evidence against job requirements Concentrate on solid facts Take account of all available information Overall Issues in Interviewing? Requires skill / effective preparation, implementation and monitoring Training / practice required for interviewers

13 STRUCTURED INTERVIEWS Pilbeam & Corbridge, 2006 – all candidates asked same questions / in same order 3 main types of structured interview / interviewers can use a combination: Biographical Situational / problem-solving Behavioural / competency

14 STRUCTURED INTERVIEWS 1. Biographical Interviews Structured probing of candidates’ responses to application form questions – checking, clarifying, exploring issues Aids consistency / assumes application form asks [all] relevant biographical questions

15 STRUCTURED INTERVIEWS 2. Situational Interviews Seek candidate responses to hypothetical (but realistic / typical) job situations or scenarios Trying to gauge how people would behave / would resolve problems Would people necessarily behave the way they say they would? Might favour quick-thinkers!

16 STRUCTURED INTERVIEWS 3. Behavioural Interviews Ask candidates to give examples of past job- based / job-related behaviours Assumes that past behaviours are indicators of future behaviour

17 SITUATIONAL INTERVIEW?


Download ppt "Lecture 5b) Selection. 3. SELECTING CANDIDATES "… predicting which candidate(s) will make the most appropriate contribution to the organisation - now."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google