Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Clinical Foot and Ankle Biomechanics Overview of course By Paul Harradine (Podiatrist) Fiona Holdcroft May 2009.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Clinical Foot and Ankle Biomechanics Overview of course By Paul Harradine (Podiatrist) Fiona Holdcroft May 2009."— Presentation transcript:

1 Clinical Foot and Ankle Biomechanics Overview of course By Paul Harradine (Podiatrist)
Fiona Holdcroft May 2009

2 Session Overview Functional anatomy:
Basic terminology The ‘normal’ foot The abnormal foot Gait Biomechanical foot and ankle assessment Our role in treatment Summary/conclusions

3 The ‘Normal’ Foot The unified theory 3 previous podiatric theories
All disagree in normal, abnormal and treatment methodology All achieved clinical results Unified theory combines the above Foot Morphology (1970), Tissue Stress Theory (1980), Sagittal plane facilitation theory (1980)

4 Basic Terminology Pronation (Arch lowering) Supination (Arch Rising)
Position of Eversion, Abduction & Dorsiflexion Supination (Arch Rising) Position of Inversion, Adduction & Plantarflexion Varus - Inversion Valgus - Eversion Forefoot - Structures distal to midtarsal joint 1st Ray 1st metatarsal, medial cuneiform & navicular NOT hallux

5 Functional Anatomy Ankle joint Talocrural Subtalar joint
Midtarsal joint 1st Ray/MTPJ Talocrural – PF/DF. As DF talus pushes into tibia mortis – if stiff here can loose 8 degrees DF thus can mob them Subtalar – Pron/Supination & inversion/eversion (2:1 ratio, 20 vs 10 degrees) Soft end feel vs bony end feel) . Forms rear foot. Mid tarsal joint - Functional unit consisting two separate joints (calcaneo-cuboid & talo-navicular). Very floppy joint (i.e. if cup heal to stabilize rear foot can wobble MTJ in all directions ->decreased stability but ability to adapt to different surfaces 1st ray - triplanar but clinically PF/DF

6 Normal foot function Axis normally in line with 2nd toe (Subtalar joint ensures this with level of pron/supn)

7 Abnormal foot function
Medial axis Pronated Lateral axis Supinated

8 Ground Reaction Force Neutral foot position provides equal force
Change in foot axis increases ground reaction force on one side causing foot to tilt i.e. medial movement of axis increases lateral pressure so foot everts resulting in pronation Therefore if have pronated foot want to put orthotic on medial heal to increase ground reaction force here to get equilibrium and reduce pronation

9 Interaction of 1st ray and 1st MTPJ
Try: PF/DF 1st ray PF/DF hallux DF 1st ray then DF hallux Normal interaction ROM 1st MTPJ is dependant on position of 1st ray 1st ray has to PF (drop) to allow translation Can get functional limitation of DF at hallux with lack of 1st ray PF If DF (push up) 1st ray ->decreased ext hallux Arch filler not good as pushes 1st ray up -> decreased great toe mvt

10 Gait Cycle Foot responds to the hip during gait cycle
As MR hip foot pronates As LR hip foot supinates Heal strike -> stance -> toe off Hip MR Hip LR Pronation Supination Thus clinically OA hip cant pronate in standing and weak gluts leads to pronation

11 Stability in the gait cycle
Required during stance phase Heal strike Reverse windlass mechanism Pronate Arch lowers & lengthens Plantar structures become taut Pulls joints together Increased stability Do also have additional stabilising factors e.g. long and short plantar ligaments and the spring ligaments and intrinsic foot m/s cross mid tarsal joint thus strengthening these will decrease pronation

12 …however this decreases toe flexion
stand with foot pronated & try and PF hallux Toe off Windlass mechanism Foot supinates Arch rises (Potential to loose tension in plantarfascia and thus stability) Tension maintained in plantarfascia through ‘winding’ of the windlass around 1st MTPJ i.e. PF hallux If just let arch rise plantar facia will loose tension/slacken thus decreasing stability (when we need it most) i.e. have to DF hallux to maintain tension in plantarfascia thus maintaining stability

13 Rocking mechanism To allow smooth transfer of weight from heal strike to toe off 3 mechanisms: Heal Rounded underside facilitates forward momentum Passive knee flexion as tib ant eccentrically fires to decelerate motion Ankle DF DF of digits Preferably hallux (60%) Allows hip extension Ankle – need 10 degrees DF, controlled through eccentric calf activity (N.B as knee is already flexed) DF digits - hallux ->ensures windlass mechanism

14 Over pronation To hard To far
Can not re-supinate or LR at hip Gait compensation e.g. abductory twist, reduced hip rotation To far Lower limb functional malalignment Increased MR hip ‘squinting patella’ Increased plantarfascia stress Gait compensation e.g. side sway, excessive pelvic rotation, decreased hip extension, trunk flexion, abductory twist, MTJ DF, 1st IPJ DF, lateral column propulsion Functional hallux limitus & reduced 3rd rocker Abductor twist – MR heal to give LR at hip Reduced LR hip – decreased pelvis rotation, forward lean, decreased arm swing Functional halloos limitus via reverse windlass mechanism Side sway – moves foot axis laterally Lateral column propulsion – walk on lateral border i.e. 5th toe. Often seen as wear on lateral side of shoes NB: altered gait can be due to other factors e.g. decreased hip extension, weak gluts

15 What causes pronation? Muscle activity e.g. weak gluts
Increased external pronatory forces Obesity Running Ankle Equinus Reduced DF ROM (<10 degrees with foot in subtalar neutral) Reduced 2nd rocker Weak gluts e.g. post hip surgery Obesity increases pronation as increased mass increases pronation force therefore decreased ability to re-supinate

16 Compensation mechanism
Foot morphology Rearfoot varus Rearfoot inverted in relation to lower 1/3 of leg Forefoot varus Forefoot inverted in relation to rearfoot Forefoot Valgus Forefoot everted in relation to rearfoot PF 1st ray 2 forefoot angles: 1-5 &2-5 Compensation mechanism 2-5 is true angle, 1-5 hides it (due to PF 1st ray)

17 ARCH height means nothing - It is irrelevant -
Important thing is reserve of pronation

18 Foot assessment LL assessment in supine Subtalar neutral
Pronation tests Supination Resistance Test Maximum Pronation Test Navicular Drop Test Hubschers Test STJ Axis Position Gait analysis

19 LL assessment in supine
Leg length Malleolus position pre and post ‘sit up’ MR/LR at hips Knee extension Position of tibial tuberosity vs patella Tibial torsion ?knee hyperextension Tibial tuberosity ideally under patella/in line ?bowing of tibia

20 Subtalar neutral Patient prone Feel talus position with ‘inside hand’
Move foot to find neutral with ‘outside hand’ In subtalar neutral assess for ROM DF? Rearfoot or forefoot varus/valgus? Position of 1st ray?

21 Pronation tests Quick guide into relationship between patients foot function and symptoms 5 tests Help to answer the question How hard is the patient pronating? How far is the patient pronating? Is there a functional hallux limitus? Does my patient need an onward podiatry referral? Does my patient need orthotics? Possible false negative BUT not false positive due to static assessment of dynamic structure

22 Supination Resistance Test
Assesses force required to re-supinate STJ With patient standing try and lift arch with moderate force i.e. supinate foot Assess resistance Easy: abnormally small pronatory forces ?supinator Moderate: Normal Hard: Abnormally large pronatory forces

23 Maximum Pronation Test
Assesses reserve of pronation, and thus if patient is maximally pronated irrespective of arch height With patient standing ask them to roll down their arches. Assess for calcaneal eversion (from behind): < 2 degrees rearfoot eversion -> no reserve of pronation, thus maximally pronated >2 degrees rearfoot eversion ->reserve of pronation, thus not maximally pronated

24 Navicular Drop Test Assesses amount of pronation relevant to STJ, not arch height With patient standing record height of navicular tubercle with neutral axis (from behind). Repeat with patient relaxed >10mm drop indicates abnormally pronated foot position

25 The Hubscher Test Assesses for functional hallux limitus
With patient standing attempt to passively DF hallux Grade on scale 0-3: 0: Nil DF (abnormal - ?pronator) 1: Slight DF (abnormal - ?pronator) 2: DF with resistance. Slight arch raising with limited MR leg (normal) 3: DF with limited resistance. Complete arch rising with obvious MR leg (abnormal - ?supinator)

26 STJ Axis Position Allows estimation of joint axis position
With patient standing palpate talus head and estimate angle of axis by imagining perpendicular line to talus Medial axis indicates ?pronation Axis towards 2nd toe indicates neutral foot position Lateral axis indicates ?supination

27 Pronatory Gait Compensations
Abductory twist Reduced pelvic rotation Trunk flexion/forward lean Decreased arm swing Increased side sway Excessive pelvic rotation Decreased hip extension MTJ DF 1st IPJ DF Lateral column propulsion Abductor twist – MR heal to give LR at hip Reduced LR hip – decreased pelvis rotation, forward lean, decreased arm swing Side sway – moves foot axis laterally Excessive pelvic rotation – AP/PA. Move pelvis due to decreased ability to rotate hips Decreased hip extension – reduced 3rd rocker MTJ DF – Rock over MTJ 1st IPJ DF – Hyperextend great toe to rock through Lateral column propulsion – walk on lateral border i.e. 5th toe. Often seen as wear on lateral side of shoes NB: altered gait can be due to other factors e.g. decreased hip extension, weak gluts (-> increased pronation-> decreased 3rd rocker)

28 Our role in treatment Exercises: aim to decreases pronatory forces
LR hip strengthening Stretches for ankle equinus Intrinsic foot muscle strengthening Proprioception training Mobilisations: aim to increase ROM to restore normal gait TCJ MTJ 1st MTPJ

29 Taping/padding: To reduce pronatory forces
Plantarfascia taping Trial felt medial heal wedge Trial felt 1st ray cut outs Helps recognise when orthotics may be beneficial Padding – build up medial heal to decrease pronatory force -> decreased pronation. Stand someone on orthotic and review great toe extension

30 Orthotics Aim to reduce pronatory forces and facilitate medial column propulsion Equalise ground reaction force Bring axis from medial position to 2nd toe Level the see-saw Facilitate ‘normal’ gait Use rearfoot posting with medial heal support +/- 1st ray cut off NOT arch support Need to recognise when to use custom or non custom orthotics

31 Custom vs non-custom orthotics
Immediate provision Inexpensive Bulky Limited modification to patient Often 1st ray impingement Custom Modified for patient Required for complex patients Outcome reviewed Less bulky Wait to see podiatry More expensive NB Poorly fitting orthotics can cause functional hallux limitus AND Never alter an orthotic, refer back to prescriber

32 The Runner Running is not an accelerated form of walking: Therefore
Increased GRF (2.5-3x body weight) Increased frequency of heal strike Increased limb varus Therefore Increased need to reduce pronatory forces e.g. with orthotics, strengthening Need to check outcomes dynamically Look at footwear Walking GRF = xbody weight

33 Trainers Many varieties 3 Classification Neutral Weight Stability
Motion Control Control Mizuno Waverider 11 Brooks GTS Adrenalin 8 Brooks Beast/Ariel

34 Upper support Flexion stability
If push down on medial border of shoe it should provide support and not compress down Flexion stability If push up on distal end of shoe should flex at MTPJ NOT mid foot Good flexion stability Bad flexion stability Poor upper stability

35 Summary Foot acts as a see-saw and responds to GRF
Normal foot function during gait: Heal strike and the 1st rocker MR hip and foot pronation Reverse windlass mechanism 2nd rocker to allow stance LR and foot supination 3rd rocker for toe off Windlass Mechanism and medial column propulsion Hip and knee extension to progress to swing phase

36 Screen for over pronation with 5 key tests Recognise when
Foot position may be impacting on symptoms Orthotics may be appropriate Referral to podiatry is indicate


Download ppt "Clinical Foot and Ankle Biomechanics Overview of course By Paul Harradine (Podiatrist) Fiona Holdcroft May 2009."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google