1. Legal Psychology Gerhard Ohrband ULIM University, Moldova 5 th lecture Testimony assessment

2. Course structure Lectures: 1. Introduction into Legal Psychology – Theories of crime 2. Correctional treatment 3. Victimology 4. Police psychology 5. Testimony assessment 6. Criminal responsibility 7. Judicial judgments 8. Psychological assessment of families

3. Course structure Seminars: 9. Eyewitness testimony 10. Jury decision-making 11. Child abuse 12. Prostitution 13. Rape 14. Tax evasion 15. Stereotypes and prejudices in the law system

4. Competence to testify Credibility assessment Criteria-based content analysis Effects of interviewer preconceptions on questioning behavior and hypothesis testing in interviews Suggestion Testimony about traumatic experiences Nonverbal indicators of deception Psychophysiological assessment of testimony Neuropsychological aspects of credibility assessments Person identification Content

5. 1. Competence to testify Basic requirementsForensic interview situation -Adequate situation perception -Storage over a long time-frame -Adequate source-monitoring -Mostly independent retrieval Capacity to produce description understandle for others -Linguistic expressive capacity -Existence of control instances against suggestive influences -Relevent communicative competences What about small children? What about individuals with reduced intellectual capacitites?

6. 2. Credibility assessment Three domains of evaluation and analysis: Analysis of the testimony’s personality Analysis of the testimony’s genesis Analysis of the testimony’s quality

7. 3. Criteria-based content analysis Cognitive aspectStrategical aspect Non-motivational featuresMotivation-related features Concrete testimony elements Contextual framework, interactions, conversations, story complications, unusual, unimportant, not understood, complicated, effects Spontaneous corrections, admission of lacunes and insecurities, struggle to remember, control with reality, self-accusations Entire testimonyDegree of details, logical consistency, unstructred presentation, spontaneous correctibility Beyond the testimonyConstancy of the testimony, can be further completed

8. 4. Effects of interviewer preconceptions on questioning behavior and hypothesis testing in interviews Distortions of cognitive processes: Over-estimation of the hypothesis’ a priori probability Selective encoding and selective retrieval of informational material congruent with the hypothesis Interpretation of unclear information in consistency with the hypothesis Affirmation bias

9. 5. Suggestion False information effects Pseudo memories

10. Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale (GSS; Gudjonsson, 1997) The only validated instrument to assess interrogative suggestibility Frequently used in the assessment of whether people with intellectual disabilities have the capacity to testify in court Procedure: asking respondents to recall a short story, using leading questions and pressure to change their responses Using the GSS, people with intellectual disabilites appear highly suggestible, relative to the general population. Discussion: Why is that so?

11. Extracts of the GSS2 Extract … they saw a small boy / going down a steep slope / on a bicycle / and calling for help. / Anna and John ran after the boy / and John caught hold of the bicycle / and brought it to a halt. / The boy appeared very frightened / but unhurt / … Anna and John recognized the boy / whose name was William. Examples of leading questions Did the boy on the bicycle pass a stop sign or traffic lights? Did the boy drop the books he was carrying whilst riding the bicycle? Was Anna worried that the boy might be injured? Did John grab the boy’s arm or shoulder?

12. 6. Testimony about traumatic experiences Definition 1: Trauma memories are memories about an especially traumatic experience Definition 2: Trauma memories are memories of an event which lead to PTSD. Psychological process: dissociation and repression Neurobiological processes

13. 7. Nonverbal indicators of deception – theoretical assumptions BehaviorStress /arous al FearGuiltControlCognitive workload/w orking memory Lay presumptions Nonverbal behavior in the head region Blinking>>???> Eye contact?<<><< Averting gaze?>><>> Head movements>><<<> Nodding>< ?/>?> Smiling?< ?/><? Nonverbal behavior in the body region Adaptors>>?<<> Hand movements>>?<<> Gesticulating?<< <> Leg/foot movem.>>?<<> Body movements>??<?>

14. Theoretical assumptions (cont.) BehaviorStress/ar ousal FearGuiltControlCognitive workload Lay assumptions Paraverbal behavior Length of message ?<?>/<<? Number of words ?<?>/<<? Speech rate>><>/<<> Filled pauses>>?<>> Unfilled pauses ?>?<>> Pitch>>?/<??> Repetitions?/>>??>? Response latency ?/<?><>> Speech errors>???/<>>

15. Explanations > = increases with deception < = decreases with deception ? = no prediction or unclear prediction / = rivaling predictions dependent on different aspects of the theory

16. Results from meta-analyses VariableZucker man & Driver (1985) DePaulo et. al. (2003) Sporer & Schwandt (2006, 2007) weighted r Sporer & Schwandt (2006, 2007) unweighte d r Zuckerman et. al. (1981) Köhnken (1988) Nonverbal behavior in the head region Blinking.24*.03.00.32.53 Eye contact-.01.00-.01-.02-.45 Averting gaze.01/.03.03.02.53 Head movements-.09-.01.06.05.2949 Nodding.00-.09*-.05 Smiling-.04.00-.03-.07*.15.23 Nonverbal behavior in the body region Adaptors.17**.08*.02.07**.84.79 Hand movements.00-.19**-.18** Gesticulating-.06-.07*.02.10.58 Leg/foot movem.-.01-.04-.07*-.05.67.56 Body movements-.01.02.01.03.56.66

17. Results from meta-analyses (cont.) VariableZuckerma n & Driver (1985) DePaulo et. al. (2003) Sporer & Schwandt (2006, 2007) weighted r Sporer & Schwandt (2006, 2007) unweighted r Zuckerman et. al. (1981) Köhnken (1988) Paraverbal behavior Length of message -.09*-.01-.04-.06.22.15 Number of words -.01.01 Speech rate-.030.03.01.56.65 Filled pauses.26**.00.04.03.54 Unfilled pauses.00-.02.02 Pitch.32*.10*10*.13*.43 Repetitions.10*.08.11.77 Response latency -.01.01.11**.09**.32.79 Speech errors.11*.00.04.06*.72.70

18. 8. Psychophysiological assessment of testimony Indirect methods (deed knowledge technique; also Concealed information Test) – tests if a person has specific information which only a participant could have; tests presence or absence of a differential physiological reaction Direct methods (control questions techniques) – direct questions on the deed

19. 9. Neuropsychological aspects of credibiliy assessment Forms of false memory (Brainerd & Reyna, 2005) Semantic intrusion in list recall Semantic false alarms in list recognition False memory for semantic inferences Suggestibility of eyewitness memory False identification of criminal suspects False memory for schema-consistent events False memory in reality monitoring False memory from reasoning Autobiographical false memory

20. 10. Person identification Performance vs. motivation Motivational or social factors influences the tendency to choose someone from a lineup Cognitive and memory factors the accuracy of the decision

21. Literature Ask, K. & Granhag, P.A. (2005). Motivational sources of confirmation bias in criminal investigations: The need of cognitive closure. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 2, 43-63. Vrij, A. (2005). Criteria-Based-Content Analysis: A qualitative review of the first 37 studies. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11 (1), 3-41. Sporer, S.L. (2001). Recognizing faces of other ethnic groups: An integration of theories. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7, 36-97. Steblay, N.M. (1997). Social influence in eyewitness recall: a meta-analytic review of lineup instruction effects. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 283-297.