Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

The Sociocultural Level of Analysis 4.1 Sociocultural Cognition.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "The Sociocultural Level of Analysis 4.1 Sociocultural Cognition."— Presentation transcript:

1 The Sociocultural Level of Analysis 4.1 Sociocultural Cognition

2 Principles 1.Human beings are social animals and we have a basic need to belong 2.Culture influences behaviour 3.Because humans are social animals, they have a social self. People do not only have an individual identity, but also a collective or social one 4.People’s views of the world are resistant to change

3 CULTURE Culture can be defined as the norms and values that define a society

4 Be Reflective 1.Brainstorm a list of the groups to which you belong. 2.How important are these groups in your personal identity? 3.What needs do these different groups fill in your life?

5 Research Methods More qualitative Naturalistic Participant observation Descriptive data Overt observation Covert observation *handouts

6 Participant Observation Overt Observation: example – O´Reilly 2000 studies British expatriates on the Costa del Sol Ethical considerations

7 Covert Covert: Example – Leon Festinger et al’s When Prophecy Fails 1956 in Chicago – a religious cult Ethical considerations

8 Attribution Theory Attribution is defined as how people interpret and explain causal relationships in the social world Humans have a need to understand why things happen Example: 1. Explain why to this scenario: You are sitting in an restaurant, waiting for your date to show up. He or she is late. What is your explanation to why he or she is late? 2. You received a high grade on a test. What is your explanation to the high grade?

9 Attribution Theory Who (or what) is responsible? For poverty? For unemployment? For alcoholism? For my math grade? whether we help and how we help – “Who is responsible for the problem?” – “Who is responsible for the solution?”

10 The Actor-observer effect  When people discuss their own behaviour, they tend to do attribute it to situational factors (external) “bad luck” “had a cold” The tendency to think: "If others make mistakes, it's their fault. If I do it, it's not my fault. It's due to the situation I'm in."  When people observe someone else’s behaviour, they are more likely to attribute it to dispositional factors (internal) “he is so nice” “she is so smart”

11 Errors in Attributions – illogical conclusions The Fundamental attribution error Is when people overestimate the role of dispositional factors in an individual’s behaviour, and underestimate the situational factors “she helped me – so she must be nice” “what an idiot, he didn’t say hello today” Example: Lee at al. 1977 p. 105

12 Errors in attribution Self-Serving bias (SSB) The tendency to make personal attributions for successes and situational attributions for failure For example: a good grade – I am so smart! A low grade – bad teacher/ been sick/ wrong questions… Example: Lau & Russel 1980 American football coaches Why do we do this? (Greenberg et al. 1982)

13 Strength of bias depends on… If one is depressed – the thinking pattern Which culture one is from, for example: Americans show greater tendency to make personal attributions for other people’s behaviours. In contrast, participants from India show an increased tendency to make situational attributions. (graphs) Modesty bias – cultural differences in SSB (US and Japanese students)

14 Attitudes  Do our attitudes influence our actions? – More so when we are made self-conscious  Do actions influence our attitudes? -  Cognitive dissonance (Festinger)– when attitudes and behavior contradict each other … what changes?  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=korGK0yGIDo http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=korGK0yGIDo

15 Homework Quiz - Monday Because you were so great at role-playing, I want you to create a role-play that shows 1.Actor-observer effect 2.The fundamental attribution 3.Self-serving bias 4.Cognitive dissonance

16 Biases in Judgment Implicit Personality Theory –People assume that certain aspects or traits go together Halo effectHalo effect: We assume people we like have good characteristics, even if we haven’t seen them, or perceive more characteristics as positive as well without knowing An example would be judging a good-looking person as more intelligent. Self-concept bias –What we consider important in ourselves is often what we consider important in others Primacy effects –People are influenced more by info they receive early in an interaction than by info that appears later –We will even re-interpret new information so that it fits our earlier impression of people

17 Social Identity Theory

18 Henry Tajfel developed this theory Which assumes that individuals strive to improve their self-image by trying to enhance their self- esteem based on either personal identify or various social identities In other words, We also enhance the sense of identity by making comparisons with out-groups. Social identity is different from personal identity, which is derived from personal characteristics and individual relationships.

19 Social Identity Theory Example: When abroad, especially in countries which have particularly different languages and cultures, we feel our nationality far more keenly than when we are at home. We will tend to band together in national groups, perhaps making comments about the strangeness of the natives. Recognize yourself?

20

21 Social identity Theory Based on Social categorization In-group (us) – out-group (them) and by social comparison one maintain one’s self-esteem This is done automatically, as soon as we consider us being part of a group, even when it is by chance/casually assigned. Is there one between DP1A and DP1B?

22 Evaluation absence of competition – not necessarily a negative outcome Describes Does not predict In Some cases our personal identity is stronger Fails to address the environment

23 Social Representations – foundation of social cognition The shared beliefs and explanations held by the society in which we live or the group to which we belong (Moscovici 1973) “cultural schemas”

24

25 Stereotypes & Prejudice Write down the first thing that comes to your mind when I say the following…and be honest. WE all have stereotypes!

26 Swedes IB student IV student Malmö Doctor Blond girl Men Fairy tales Scientist Women Americans Chinese

27 Stereotypes Is defined as social perception of an individual in terms of group membership or physical attributes. It is a generalization that is made about a group and then attributed to members of that group. Can be either positive or negative.

28 Implicit Association Test (Harvard) Online test that tests your attitudes (implicitly) Prejudice: unfavorable opinion or feeling formed beforehand or without knowledge, thought, or reason. any preconceived opinion or feeling, either favorable or unfavorable. unreasonable feelings, opinions, or attitudes, especially of a hostile nature, regarding a racial, religious, or national group

29 Another teacher who wanted to teach through role-playing… Jane Elliot –A Class Divided http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JCjDxAwfX V0 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JCjDxAwfX V0 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0UbNp15z DtE&feature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0UbNp15z DtE&feature=related

30 Formation of stereotypes Stereotyping is form of social categorization that affects the behaviour of those who hold the stereotype and those who are labelled by a stereotype. Schema processing

31

32

33 Formation of stereotypes  Social categorization (Tajfel)  Personal experience and gatekeepers (the media, parents…)  Campbell: grain of truth hypothesis  Hamilton and Gifford: stereotypes are the result of an illusory correlation – people see a relationship between two variables even when there is none

34 Formation of stereotypes o Confirmation bias – seek out support for the stereotype, which makes stereotypical thinking resistant to change o Snyder and Swann (1978) conducted a study which showed just that with female college students o Methods one use to study stereotyping, prejudice and discrimination…? Due to social desirability effect

35 Stereotype Threat The effect of stereotypes on an individual’s performance Spotlight anxiety (Steele 1997) Women and Math Ethnicity and different abilities Videos on the blog


Download ppt "The Sociocultural Level of Analysis 4.1 Sociocultural Cognition."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google