1. Risk Management Project Survey’s preliminary results Face to face meeting MCOFE Warsaw 28 May 2015 Fabrizio Rotundi

2. Page 2 Nov ‘14 Dec ‘14 Mar ‘15 May ‘15 Sep ‘15 Template Framework Survey output Benchmark analysis Best practice Guidelines Nov ‘15 Road map proposal for developing Risk Management among NSIs

3. Page 3 Reading-key Criteria Project’s subdivisions and links between output’s variables 3READING-KEY CRITERIA To analyse the experiences 3READING-KEY CRITERIA To analyse the experiences 2PARAMETERS To elaborate the questionnaire 2PARAMETERS To elaborate the questionnaire SEVERAL FACTORS describing each parameter To set the questions SEVERAL FACTORS describing each parameter To set the questions

4. Page 4 Track 1 - Defining the Template’s Reading-Key Criteria The Reading-Key Criteria are the lens to analyze the experiences through 2.The “Uncertainty experts” dimension refers to the actors, roles, organizational units or structures to which the organization assigns the responsibility to conceptualize and control uncertainty and, consequently, the responsibility for Risk Management. 3.The “Technologies” dimension reveals the extent to which the Risk Management System becomes embedded or decupled in the organization and refers to the practices, procedures and tools adopted by an organization to implement Risk Management. 1.The “Risk rationalities” dimension reflects the main purpose which any organization grounds its own risk strategy on (i.e. compliance, performance, company value, etc.).

5. Page 5 Track 2 – Describing the Parameters which guide the Questionnaire a)Level of effectiveness in context analysis and of consistency with identified risks b)Cost planning level c)Level of consistency with the statistics production Quality model d)Thoroughness level in implementing a Risk Management practice e)Etc. etc. a)Accordance level with international standards b)Financial sustainability c)Detection of key steps resulting from a thorough and methodical application of Risk Management d)Etc. etc.

6. Page 6 Integrated Common Framework GSBPM 5.0 The organisational Risk Management encourages practices based on the early planning of activities, anticipating possible obstacles in achieving objectives, instead of the logic of urgency.

7. Page 7 Survey’s statistical analysis

8. Page 8 Survey’s statistical analysis

9. Page 9 Survey’s statistical analysis

10. Page 10 Survey’s statistical analysis

11. Page 11 Survey’s statistical analysis

12. Page 12 Survey’s statistical analysis

13. Page 13 Survey’s statistical analysis

14. Page 14 Strategy

15. Page 15 Experiences

16. Page 16 Governance

17. Page 17 Impacts on organization

18. Page 18 Communication

19. Page 19 Functions and Accountabilities

20. Page 20 Stakeholders Involvement

21. Page 21 Treatment and monitoring

22. Page 22 Internal Environment

23. Page 23 Growth and training

24. Page 24 Mapping Organization

25. Page 25 Resources

26. Page 26 Example of conceptual map: Rationalities

27. Page 27 Example of conceptual map: Uncertainty Experts

28. Page 28 Example of conceptual map: Technologies

29. Page 29 The expected outcomes 1.Building and sharing questionnaire (2 nd half of February) 2.Survey (8 th of April) 3.Collecting data (15 th of May) 4.Data Analysis & Report processing (end of June 2015) 5.Program implementation case studies (max 3) analysis (July-Sept) 6.Development of guidelines (September) 7.Sharing of Guidelines final draft (End of October)

30. Page 30 Thank you for your attention !!! Fabrizio ROTUNDI rotundi@istat.it Alessandro HINNA alessandro.hinna@uniroma.it