Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byDwain Young Modified over 9 years ago
1
Quality of life in rural areas: experiences and cooperation Brussels, 25 October 2004 European Commission
2
UTÖ – A VIBRANT COMMUNITY ALL YEAR ROUND Southwest Finland’s outermost archipelago three consecutive Leader+ projects during the years 2001-2004 to preserve year-round habitation and safeguard basic services applicant the Utö Home District Association
3
LOCATION IN THE OUTERMOST ARCHIPELAGO Turku Utö 50 km 4 hrs 50 km 1,5 hrs
4
SETTLED DURING THE 1740s TO SERVE SEAFARING
5
UTÖ AT THE END OF 1800s
6
POPULATION TODAY 40 all-year-round inhabitants (30 civilians and 10 in the service of the army) approx. 30 conscripts in the military service approx. 10 native-born Utö residents who work on the mainland but pay their taxes to the local municipality approx. 150 return to the home island to spend the summer
7
AGE DISTRIBUTION OF THE 40 ALL-YEAR INHABITANTS Population below the age of 20: 20 % Working age population: 55 % Population over the age of 60: 25 % Percentage of unemployed: 0 % Working population in the 3rd sector: 100 %
8
UTÖ TODAY
9
BASIC SERVICES Water and sewer system Electricity since the 1940s All-year-round grocer’s and post office Municipal library Wireless broadband Internet connection Comprehensive school since 1884, classes 0-6 Incredible nature
10
AN EARLY MORNING IN THE SPRING
11
INTERESTING BIRDLIFE
12
THE LIGHTHOUSE AND PILOT STATION
13
THE SPRING – EIDER DUCKS
14
IN THE MIDST OF NATURE
15
IN THE SUMMER
16
THE ANNUAL FISHING COMPETITION IN NOVEMBER
17
A ROCK CONCERT BY LOCAL YOUNGSTERS
18
THE BACKGROUND OF THE PROJECTS In 2001 the army announced that the island’s military operations would be reduced The last governmental employer would vanish in a few years All-year vibrant community was threatened
19
THE GOALS OF THE PROJECT To keep up the vibrant community all year round To preserve all services To search for new people to use the services To bring the properties released by the military into residential use To respect nature-based values and sustainable development To preserve the traditions and culture of the island
20
THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROJECTS First project: A village plan for Utö Second project: Creation of contacts with the Municipality of Korpo, the local military authority, Ministry of Defense and Senate Properties that owns the real estate left unused by the Finnish Army Third project: Planning of a realty company for the administration of housing and creating a vision to the year 2010
21
THE PROJECT SUPERVISOR, MS. JOHANNA PAKOLA
22
PROBLEMS To find our negotiating partner from the public administration The slowness of the decision-making process in the public administration Utö has willing movers in the queue but the empty dwellings remain empty for a second year The decision from the municipality’s decision-makers is lacking
23
THE PUBLICITY Lots of publicity in the media Attention from the Finnish government Almost 100 potential movers notified our project supervisor The profile of a potential mover
24
UTÖ IN DECEMBER
25
UTÖ IN JANUARY
26
UTÖ IN FEBRUARY
27
UTÖ IN MARCH
28
THE RESULTS 10 new inhabitants The school continues The grocer’s still functions all year round Three new companies established Wireless broadband Internet connection Website www.uto.fi in Finnish, Swedish and Englishwww.uto.fi The spirit of doing things together
29
MR JOHANNES KETOLA WITH HIS FAMILY, A NEWCOMER AND ENTREPRENEUR
30
MS. HANNA KOVANEN, A RETURNING MIGRANT AND TOURIST OPERATOR
31
MR. CAJ ÖSTERLUND, A RETURNING MIGRANT AND TOURIST OPERATOR
32
MR. MARKKU KARPIO AND MS. SUSANNA SJÖMAN, AN AUTHOR AND A TRANSLATOR
33
THE PLANNED REALTY COMPANY Takes care of the administration of housing Offers one job opportunity Rents out available dwellings for newcomers Planned shareholders: The Municipality of Korpo (26 %) The Utö Home District Association (26 %) Åbo Akademi University Foundation (48 %) marine biology research unit
34
THE ISLAND OF UTÖ - THE FUTURE (Convernet?) /Military area
35
THE BUDGET Total budgetPublic contributionPrivate contribution (used) Project 11 194.78955.82238.96 (EU 50%477.91) (State 30 % 286.75) (municipalities 20% 191.16) Project 233 533.5426 826.846 706.70 (EU 50%13 413.42) (State 30% 8 048.05) (municipalities 20% 5 365.37) Project 324 195.1319 356.104 839.03 (EU 50% 9 678.05) (State 30%5 806.83) (municipalities 20%3 871.22) _______________________________________________________________________ TOTAL58 923.4547 138.7611 784.69 (EU 50%23 569,38)(2171.48 by voluntary (State 30%14 141.63)work) (municipalities 20% 9 427.75)
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.