Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byMason McLeod Modified over 11 years ago
1
NORA – The Norwegian Experience Presentation to the DRIVER Summit, Göttingen January 16th – 17th 2008 Jan Erik Frantsvåg, NORA Project Manager
2
What is NORA NORA = Norwegian Open Research Archives A collaberation between universities, colleges and research institutes in Norway NORA harvests and presents metadata from all known OAI-PMH compliant repositories in academic Norway on a daily basis Has developed tools for letting also non-OAI- PMH compliant repositories transfer metadata to NORA – thus making them OAI-PMH- harvestable
3
Present status 14 000 documents 15 repositories –6 universities –1 business school –3 colleges –4 research institutes –1 directorate About 30 universities/colleges coming soon (2008)
4
Functionality Advanced search http://www.ub.uio.no/nora/noaister/topic.html?siteLanguage=eng http://www.ub.uio.no/nora/noaister/topic.html?siteLanguage=eng –Text based –Subject based Choice of –Archive –Year(s) of publication –Language –Document types Peer review status (Reviewed/Not reviewed)
5
Harvesting Daily from all repositories Selected by Document type –Only certain document types are harvested –Only metadata pertaining full-text documents are harvested
6
Metadata Metadata standards are the crucial point in creating a nationwide common search facility and gateway to institutional repositories NORA has developed a common metadata model used by all repositories Definitions, common understanding and common practices are developed by discussions through NORA A common, simple subject classification scheme makes subject-based search possible
7
Capabilities NORA offers RSS feeds based on advanced searches –This enhances local capabilities NORA is not openly harvestable, but can be harvested on a by appointment basis, e.g. by –(International) Subject based repositories –Plagiarism checkers Harvesting by the National Library to ensure long term archiving and preservation (near future)
8
Experiences Co-operation is difficult –Different needs Document types a major discussion point –Different possibilities No common software platform, though DSpace is common to nearly all – but 2 major stakeholders have other systems –Different practices Different perceptions of scholarly Metadata are difficult –Standards are on paper only – local understanding and use are differing
9
Questions? Contact Jan Erik Frantsvåg Direct dialling +47 77 64 49 50 e-mail: janerik.frantsvag@ub.uit.nojanerik.frantsvag@ub.uit.no web: http://www.ub.uio.no/nora/http://www.ub.uio.no/nora/ http://www.openaccess.no/
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.