1. Group D "From Nobel prize to PM" and back

2. Agenda Goal Process Analysis Results Focus on stakeholders Weaknesses and improvements Conclusions

3. Goal(s) Understand why megaprojects behave like they do – Better understand the impacts of statistical relevant variable – Assess if their impact is positive or negative – Influence of internal and external stakeholders – Verify with the literature What can we do to make them perform better

4. Process - AS Preparation Selection of low p-value variables Included as output benefit for local community (Turner's Input) Focus on Energy (8 projects, but well understood) Methodology Set-up Refinement of some variables Enhanced definition for FOAK vs. New Platform Local Resident power- Inform; consult, advice, co-produce, decide Judgments from Yes/No to 1 to 5 Methodology Analysis Correlations (excel) Graph Plot Understanding from the literature

5. Focused Database

6. Refined database

7. One example: participation ladder Model

9. Focus on stakeholders Hinkley Internal Different Owner, different Client Good FEED- to what extend Performance/Impact with time? Implication with Decommissioning? external Local community support Green peace –major influence

10. Stakeholder Impact FL3 Internal Owner and Client the same (EDF) FEED depends on them- many issues for redesign and management FOAK/ New Platform- many issues /standards and regulations/New reactors External Some Distraction- what impact on time/quality/cost? Green peace-major influence?

11. Focus on stakeholders Moch Different Owner, different Client Does the fact that nuclear an important factor? Green peace-major influence Does the purpose of the megaproject include inherent political risks to varying degrees?

12. Weaknesses of our approach and how to overcome them! Few data – No true statistical relationships  Increase the sample size – We found patterns Assessment from 1 to 5 is subjective – Use Fuzzy logic approach trough discussion about each variable Not fully understanding of some relationships – Look more at the literature – Deep the case study Data analysis with excel – Get and use a decent statistical software (SPSS!) Better focus on Turner model (outputs, goals…) – We'll do next time!

13. Conclusions Cross case analysis takes time! Look at the variable behaviour to make Megaprojects perform better – Involve the community (giving power) to increase their benefits

14. Megaprojects always fail, over- budget, late and benefits! They will be no more!!!!