1. Fall 2012

2. Participants GroupRespondentsApprox. TotalApprox. % Alumni5 Faculty158102415% Staff344180419% Students25128689% Other6 TOTAL764

3. Good, Very Good, ExcellentAllFacultyStaffStudents Renewable energy68%67% 70% Solid waste & recycling67%68%70%63% Education/training of faculty/staff65%41%70%67% Energy use on campus62% 61% Commuting & transit options54%38%52%67% Student engagement54%42%52%63% Purchasing47%31%52% Campus fleet47%33%45%57% Sustainability in the curriculum43%34% 59% Food service41%28%40%47% Water use36%27%36%40% How is Creighton currently doing…………

4. Good, Very Good, ExcellentAllFacultyStaffStudents Renewable energy68%67% 70% Solid waste & recycling67%68%70%63% Education/training of faculty/staff65%41%70%67% Energy use on campus62% 61% Commuting & transit options54%38%52%67% Student engagement54%42%52%63% Purchasing47%31%52% Campus fleet47%33%45%57% Sustainability in the curriculum43%34% 59% Food service41%28%40%47% Water use36%27%36%40% How is Creighton currently doing…………

5. Essential/Very ImportantAllFacultyStaffStudents Overall cost-effectiveness80%81%80%78% Promote health & well-being80%75%81% Have management support79%80%86%69% Engage students & promote learning74%70%78%70% Effective in reducing greenhouse gas emissions71%65%69%76% Easy to implement67%64%66%68% Timely64%61%64%66% Result in multiple wins62%64%62%60% Visibility for Creighton60%58%60%61% Low up-front, initial costs47%51%50%41% Most important criteria for identifying the top strategies to include in the CAP?

6. AllFacultyStaffStudents Extremely21%26%19%22 Moderately66%57%70%64% Not9%12%7%10% How aggressive should Creighton be to achieve climate neutrality ?

7. 1 st 2 nd 3 rd Total Captured energy savings17110081352 Sustainability fund105143104352 Capital campaigns11410593312 University budget allocations736076209 Endowment fund375887172 User fees22323487 Elective fees from all9142144 Rank the following mechanisms for funding the CAP …………

8. No, not willing to pay increased fee34% Willing to pay $10 per year33% Willing to pay up to $50 per year20% Willing to pay up to $100 per year10% Willing to pay more than $100 per year3% Would students be willing to fund CAP through increased student fees?

9. No, not willing to pay increased fee34% Willing to pay $10 per year33% Willing to pay up to $50 per year20% Willing to pay up to $100 per year10% Willing to pay more than $100 per year3% Would students be willing to fund CAP through increased student fees? 66%

10. AllFacultyStaffStudents Developing incentives75%71%76%77% Recognition of individuals/departments58%54%59%60% “Challenges” between areas54%37%57%59% Sharing cost savings based on performance42%45%37%47% Developing departmental green teams38%29%39%42% Requiring participation as part of employment30%26%29%31% Incorporate into annual employee reviews21%19% 27% Tools, incentives, etc. to motivate participation ?

11. AllFacultyStaffStudents Developing incentives75%71%76%77% Recognition of individuals/departments58%54%59%60% “Challenges” between areas54%37%57%59% Sharing cost savings based on performance42%45%37%47% Developing departmental green teams38%29%39%42% Requiring participation as part of employment30%26%29%31% Incorporate into annual employee reviews21%19% 27% Tools, incentives, etc. to motivate participation ?

12. All – top 3 Faculty - top 3 Staff- top 3 Students -top 3 Lack of up-front funding60%62%59%54% Lack of faculty-staff time52%58%53%44% No clear leader33%32%36%31% Lack of faculty/staff education & training29%24%32%27% No clear benefit27%30%32%19% Lack of student participation26%16%18%55% Lack of rewards/incentives23%18%10%12% Potential challenges to implementing CAP?

13. AllFacultyStaffStudents I’d like to be a key champion13552 I’d like to be a leader in my area23787 I’m willing to be regularly involved as part of a team134326337 I’m willing to occasionally participate on a limited basis240519890 Not willing. Too busy87262733 I am not sure.1923110254 Willingness to help implement the CAP?