1. Building 100 Remodel - Feasibility Chabot College 11.12.2009

2. AGENDA Background Assumptions Scope and Cost Layouts Pros and Cons Next Steps

3. User Group Involvement June - September 2009 Dean Corcoran, Dean Vo-Kumamoto, Cindy Hicks, Jim Matthews Previous Library/Learning Connection FPP in 2007 Extensive Remodel of All Floors New Entry/Lobby/Stairs/Elevator Series of Large User Group Meetings, Interviews and Tours Previous Budget: $16M - $20M Feasibility Study No Demolition, Minimal Renovation, Moderate Remodel Current Budget: $3.1M Construction Budget, $4M Total Project Budget BACKGROUND

4. ASSUMPTIONS

5. ALL 3 OPTIONS: Construction Timeline: April – October 2010 Per DSA 8/24/09: No Sprinkler, No Seismic, No Elevator Upgrade Not included: Soft Cost, Fees, Sitework Areas to Remain: TV, Radio, Telecon, Media, Health, Restrooms All 3 Options include: Library Circulation Desk, A/V Changes and Wall Removal New Carpet/Paint, New FF&E Budget Security Adjustments, Select CCTV, Elevator Controls Associated Hazmat Connection Loop to C.U.P. COST ASSUMPTIONS

6. SCOPE AND COST

7. NO DEMOLITION ~12,800 asf, ~18,300 gsf All walls stay as is New carpet & paint Min M/E adjustments No new lighting Study Rooms on perimeter Estimate = $1.79M, ~$98/sf MINIMAL RENOVATION ~13,500 asf, ~18,300 gsf Perimeter offices stay as is New carpet & paint Some M/E adjustments 2/3 new lighting Some walls with glazing Existing offices on perimeter Study Rooms on perimeter Estimate = $3.13M, ~$171/sf MODERATE REMODEL ~14,300 asf, ~18,300 gsf All walls new configuration New carpet & paint More M/E/P adjustments All new lighting More walls with glazing New offices on perimeter Study Rooms in center More open areas Estimate = $4.42M, ~$241/sf SCOPE AND COST

8. LAYOUTS

9. NO DEMOLITION – Space Layout

10. NO DEMOLITION – Furniture Layout

11. MINIMAL – Space Layout

12. MINIMAL – Furniture Layout

13. MODERATE – Space Layout

14. MODERATE – Furniture Layout

15. LIBRARY – Space Layout

16. LIBRARY – Furniture Layout

17. MEZZANINE – Space Layout

18. PROS AND CONS

19. Centralizes Learning Support   Services Provides ‘inviting’ and   ‘welcoming’ space Provides spaces that stimulate  O  social interaction Enhances Library & Learning O  O  Connection relationship Supports collaboration and  O  integration of Programs Collects groups into ‘open areas’  O  Multi-functional dynamic spaces  O  adaptable to pedagogy Creates intuitive wayfinding   Offers convenient Study Rooms   Safe and supervisable areas   Relative Construction Timeline 3m 4m 6m Construction Cost 1.7M 3.1M 4.4M Total Units (Student Seats) 219  258  324 VISIONARY FUNCTIONAL PRAGMATIC NO DEMO PRO CON MINIMAL PRO CON MODERATE PRO CON

20. NEXT STEPS Recommended Feasibility Begin Detailed Design Phase