Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Los Angeles, California

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Los Angeles, California"— Presentation transcript:

1 Los Angeles, California
PDR Presentation Los Angeles, California Architectural Engineer – Marc Sciarrino Foundation Engineer – Marc Sciarrino Structural Engineer – Scott Mason Fluids System Engineer – Matt Owens Building Thermal Engineer – Tim Christo Solar Thermal Engineer – Andrew Baglio

2 PDR Agenda Introduction Floor Plan Layout House Elevation Drawing
Foundation Analysis Roof Truss Analysis Hydronic Subsystem Analysis Building Thermal Analysis Solar Thermal Analysis

3 Floor Plan Layout 1st Floor

4 Floor Plan Layout 2nd Floor

5 House Elevation Drawing

6 Foundations Analysis Important Information:
Soil Type : Silty Clay Loam Dry Soil Density : lb/in3 Frost Line: Approx. 12in Frost Period: days Water table: > 80in below surface Assumptions: The weight of concrete ≈ 145 lb/ft3 The weight of a house ≈ 1000 lb/ft2 Allowable Bearing pressure on soil from the footer = 150kPa ≈ 3135 lb/ft2

7 Foundations Analysis Calculations WHouse = 3060000 lb
WSlab = lb Amount of Footer Needed ≈ 1025ft2

8 Structural Analysis Two common residential truss types
Fink: Cheap, Common Howe: Also common, stronger Images from

9 Structural Analysis Truss Design Factors 6 in 12 roof (26.5°)
Asphalt Shingles Douglas Fir Maximum Stress=1700psi in compression, 1668psi in shear Pine Maximum Stress=1200psi in compression, 1438psi in shear Roofing Material weight=4.4lb/sq. Ft 85lb Flat Plate Collectors 2' Truss Spacing Information from engineeringtoolbox.com

10 Structural Analysis Truss Analysis Maximum Stress=415.32psi
Minimum Factor of Safety=4.09

11 Structural Analysis Recommendation: Use Fink type truss
2x8 top rafters, 2x4 supports, and 2x8 joist Consider pre-made truss from company such as Stone Truss Company

12 Hydronic System Design
Basic closed loop system with water as working fluid Advantages Easy to install Low maintenance Efficient heat transfer Less dense working fluid Less heat loss Cheaper Disadvantages Corrosion Needs filtration KEY A - 5 flat plate collectors B - Hot water from collectors C - Pump D - Controller E - Storage Tank w/ heat exchanger F - Incoming cold water Reference:

13 Head Loss Analysis Assumptions Results 5 plat plate colletors
Section Flow Rate Pipe Diameter Velocity Friction Head Loss Pipe Length # of Equivalent Elbows Equiv. Length per elbow Total Equiv Pipe Length of Elbows Total Equiv. Pipe Length Pipe Losses Change in Elevation Other Losses Total Losses Cumul. Head (gpm) (inches) (ft/sec) (ft head /100 ft of pipe) (ft of pipe) (#) (ft of pipe /elbow) (ft head) (ft) Pump 12.50 1.50 2.20 1.00 0.00 4.00 0.02 Control Valve 10.00 2.00 8.00 18.00 0.27 0.29 Riser Pipe 26.00 0.39 18.39 18.68 Collector Inlet Pipe 5.00 13.00 0.20 18.87 Flate Plate Collector 2.50 5.77 13.77 32.64 Reverse Return Pipe 25.00 16.00 41.00 0.62 33.26 Roof Pitch Pipe 12.00 0.18 -8.00 -7.82 25.44 Drop Pipe 22.00 0.33 -18.00 -17.67 7.77 Isolation Valve 7.78 Heat Exchanger 9.00 0.14 8.20 8.34 16.12 16.13 Assumptions 5 plat plate colletors 2.5 gpm flow rate through FPCs 8.2 ft of head loss through heat exchanger Results Max head = ft.

14 Pump Selection Must overcome max head of 33.26 ft.
Grundfos UP series Performance Curves (2) Must overcome max head of ft. Must provide flow rate of 12.5 gpm. Select either UP 26-96F or UP 26-64F Put two pumps in series to overcome max head Pumps in Series (1) References: (1) Sykes Innovative Solutions (2)

15 Storage Tank 120 gallon tank Painted steel exterior Glass lined
Cheaper Cobalt enriched lining Prolonged life Greater durability Expensive Foam insulation with R=19 Internal heat exchanger Reference: SunMaxx Solar

16 Plumbing PEX Copper Less leaks Flexible No knocking Less fittings
Shut-off valves at each supply line Can’t be used outside Can’t be recycled Cheaper Corrosion Develops leaks Knocking Weather resistant Bacteria resistant Unaffected by UV rays Recyclable Expensive Reference:

17 Window & Door Placement: 1st Floor
Doors

18 Window & Door Placement: 2nd Floor

19 Wall Cross Section Gypsum (t = ½”, 4’ x 10’, $8.55)
Studs (t = 5.5”, 2” x 6” x 8’, $3.43) Insulation t = 5.5”, 5.5” x 15” x 93”, R = 21, $44.75 t = 5.5”, 5.5” x 23” x 93”, R = 21, $58.82 Stud Gypsum Siding Lowes Plywood Insulation

20 Wall Cross Section Plywood (t = 15/32”, 15/32”x4’x8’, $12.47)
Siding (t=.042”,12.5’x8”.042”,$128/24 pieces) Stud Gypsum Home Depot Siding Lowes Plywood Insulation

21 Windows & Doors Windows (31.25” x 49.25”, U = .3, $164)
Front Door (36” x 80”, U = .23, $329) Back Door (72” x 80”, U = .29, $676) Side Door (36” x 80”, U = .15, $139) Home Depot

22 Assumptions Roof R-value is 38. Installation costs are not included.
Worst case scenario: Tsummer = 105 °F, Twinter = 25 °F, Tinside = 70 °F.

23 Design Analysis West Wall: Wall Length (ft): 30 Wall Height (ft): 18
# of Windows: 2 # of Doors: 1 Total area (ft^2): 540 Window Area (ft^2): Door Area (ft^2): 20 Stud Area (ft^2): Insulation Area (ft^2): fraction area of windows: fraction area of doors: fraction area of studs: fraction area of Insulation: Stud U-value (Btu/(h*ft^2*F)): Insulation U-value (Btu/(h*ft^2*F)): Window U-value (Btu/(h*ft^2*F)): 0.3 Door U-value (Btu/(h*ft^2*F)): 0.15 Total U-Value (Btu/(h*ft^2*F)):

24 Design Analysis 15” Insulation 23” Insulation UA = 315.14 Btu/(h*F)
QS = Btu/h QW = Btu/h P = $ 27,097.87 UA = Btu/(h*F) QS = -10,730.6 Btu/h QW = 13,796.5 Btu/h P = $ 22,117.87

25 Flat Plate Collectors 5 Collectors Sol 25 Plus

26 F-Chart Water Storage House Heating System
Location LA CROSSE MUNICIPAL ARPT WI Water volume / collector area 2.20 gallons/ft^2 Building UA (0 if only DHW) 321 Btu/hr-F Fuel Gas Efficiency of fuel usage % Domestic hot water) Yes Daily hot water usage gallons Water set temperature F Environmental temperature 68.0 F UA of auxiliary storage tank 3.12 Btu/hr-F Pipe heat loss No Relative load heat exchanger size 1.00 Collector-store heat exchanger No Flat-Plate Collector Number of collector panels 5 Collector panel area ft^2 FR*UL (Test slope) Btu/hr-ft^2-F FR*TAU*ALPHA (Test intercept) 0.660 Collector slope 47 degrees Collector azimuth (South=0) 0 degrees Incidence angle modifier calculation Glazings Number of glass covers 1 Collector flowrate/area lb/hr-ft^2 Collector fluid specific heat 1.00 Btu/lb-F Modify test values No

27 Economics Cost per unit area 35 $/ft^2 Area independent cost 2000.00 $
Price of natural gas $/100ft^3 Annual % increase in natural gas % Period of economic analysis 30 years % Down payment 100 % Annual mortgage interest rate 6.0 % Term of mortgage 30 years Annual market discount rate 4.0 % % Extra insur. and maint. in year % Annual % increase in insur. and maint. 8.0 % Eff Fed.+State income tax rate 30.0 % True % property tax rate 1.5 % Annual % increase in property tax 2.5 % % Resale value % % Credit rate in tier % Maximum investment in tier tax credits cost of nat gas

28 Questions?


Download ppt "Los Angeles, California"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google