1. Copyright 2007,Marjorie Meacham, Jenna Miley, Dianna Smith 1 ADDIE and Rapid Prototype Design SALT Conference New Learning Technologies 2008 Orlando February 20-22

2. Copyright 2007,Marjorie Meacham, Jenna Miley, Dianna Smith 2 Speakers Margie Meacham, American Express Jenna Miley, Bainbridge College Dianna Smith, SSB, Inc.

3. Copyright 2007,Marjorie Meacham, Jenna Miley, Dianna Smith 3 Purpose Share the MMS model NEW model that combines Rapid Prototyping techniques with ADDIE rigor Reduces design time Enhances quality design Invite further study

4. Copyright 2007,Marjorie Meacham, Jenna Miley, Dianna Smith 4 Overview

5. Copyright 2007,Marjorie Meacham, Jenna Miley, Dianna Smith 5 Background Collaborated on project Reviewed Existing Models Created MMS Model

6. Copyright 2007,Marjorie Meacham, Jenna Miley, Dianna Smith 6 Bates Model Product oriented Focus on distant learner Implied correlation w/ADDIE  Evaluation Linear

7. Copyright 2007,Marjorie Meacham, Jenna Miley, Dianna Smith 7 Dick & Carey Model Systems approach model Most widely cited Time consuming Appears to be linear

8. Copyright 2007,Marjorie Meacham, Jenna Miley, Dianna Smith 8 K & G Model Appears linear overall ADDIE variation\ Definite lack of evaluation

9. Copyright 2007,Marjorie Meacham, Jenna Miley, Dianna Smith 9

10. 10 The MMS Model

11. Copyright 2007,Marjorie Meacham, Jenna Miley, Dianna Smith 11 Classic ADDIE Analyze Design Evaluate Implement Develop Linear approach Evaluation takes place after implementation Assumes that each phase is dependent on the one preceding Longer cycle time

12. Copyright 2007,Marjorie Meacham, Jenna Miley, Dianna Smith 12 Rapid Prototyping Design Develop Implement Applies mathematical models to design Puts a version of the product in customer hands quickly Analysis and evaluation are replaced by the feedback loop

13. Copyright 2007,Marjorie Meacham, Jenna Miley, Dianna Smith 13 ADDIE, MMS and Rapid Prototyping Preserves the rigor of analysis and evaluation Evaluates at the end of each phase instead of after implementation Leverages some of the advantages of rapid prototype design

14. Copyright 2007,Marjorie Meacham, Jenna Miley, Dianna Smith 14 Field Trials 6 courses: 1 six-week new hire 2 e-learning courses revised 3 new blended courses from scratch Results Reduced design time Reduced learning time Increased employee satisfaction

15. Copyright 2007,Marjorie Meacham, Jenna Miley, Dianna Smith 15 Early Indicators Type of TrainingAverage Design Hours* MMS Design Hours** Instructor-led Training 3428 E-learning with 20% interactivity 220160 *Based on a study of 200 companies conducted by Brandon-Hall Consulting. **Based on six courses designed using MMS model.

16. Copyright 2007,Marjorie Meacham, Jenna Miley, Dianna Smith 16 Delphi Study Results Research Question: To what extent does a group of experts in the field of instructional design perceive the MMS model as efficient, effective and easy to use? The modified Delphi study required two rounds. Round one asked nine open ended questions regarding the MMS Instructional Design Model. Respondents were sent information regarding the model, its phases and how the phases would be used. Round two of the study contained 28 questions derived from round one responses. The questions were rated on a 5-point Likert scale with 1= Strongly disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Undecided, 4 = Agree and 5 = Strongly Agree.

17. Copyright 2007,Marjorie Meacham, Jenna Miley, Dianna Smith 17 Delphi Study Results Standard deviation.522 Interquartile deviation = 1 However that deviation was between Agree and Strongly Agree. Therefore there is consensus that the model is easy to use.

18. Copyright 2007,Marjorie Meacham, Jenna Miley, Dianna Smith 18 Delphi Study Results Standard deviation =.467 Standard deviation = 1 Again this is between Agree and Strongly Agree and supports consensus among panel members.

19. Copyright 2007,Marjorie Meacham, Jenna Miley, Dianna Smith 19 Delphi Study Results

20. Copyright 2007,Marjorie Meacham, Jenna Miley, Dianna Smith 20 Delphi Study Results Standard deviation =.894 Interquartile deviation = 1

21. Copyright 2007,Marjorie Meacham, Jenna Miley, Dianna Smith 21 Delphi Study Results There was one caveat to this question and that was to an experienced instructional designer. Several of the respondents felt that as written the model would be effective when used by someone with experience. As you can see 1 panel member disagreed with that statement, one was neutral but 6 panel members agreed that the model is effective if used by an experienced ID, and 3 Strongly agreed. Standard deviation =.924 Interquartile deviation = 1 Therefore, statistically, there is consensus among panel members.

22. Copyright 2007,Marjorie Meacham, Jenna Miley, Dianna Smith 22 Delphi Study Results

23. Copyright 2007,Marjorie Meacham, Jenna Miley, Dianna Smith 23 Evaluation at Each Phase

24. Copyright 2007,Marjorie Meacham, Jenna Miley, Dianna Smith 24 Further Study Masie Center – Learning 2008 Further Field Trials – Margie Meacham

25. Copyright 2007,Marjorie Meacham, Jenna Miley, Dianna Smith 25 Based on this overview … What are the advantages of employing this model? What challenges or gaps do you see in this model? What value do you see in this model for your environment?

26. Copyright 2007,Marjorie Meacham, Jenna Miley, Dianna Smith 26

27. Copyright 2007,Marjorie Meacham, Jenna Miley, Dianna Smith 27 Thank You! Margie Meacham - meacham.margie@gmail.com meacham.margie@gmail.com Jenna Miley – jmiley@bainbridge.edujmiley@bainbridge.edu Dianna Smith – smithdl7@state.gov