1. Caval Collaborative Solutions 1 Electronic Reserves..collaborative model CAVAL developments Collaborative Solutions VARLAC VADL –e-serials –e-books

2. Caval Collaborative Solutions 2 Why collaborative ? Not huge overlap in reserve collections Declining library staff capacity Access management issues across Internet Rise and rise of On- line teaching Better deals together

3. Caval Collaborative Solutions 3 Why not let the marketplace drive? Initiatives to deliver directly to student desk- tops !! Universities packaging up online learning management systems Perhaps service partnerships with vendors

4. Caval Collaborative Solutions 4 Delivery Mechanisms LIDDAS Unmediated Document delivery Discovery/ Location/ Delivery/Acces s and Payment Any source/ any form Z’MBOL Fielded free- text indexing and retrieval engine Z39.50 front end open solution text and meta- data

5. Caval Collaborative Solutions 5 Z’MBOL Networked Information Server DADS Digital Article Database Service –13 million bib records Blackwell’s Book Services –enabled each database to be searchable with one search Arts and Humanities Data Service –Distributed UK data service

6. Caval Collaborative Solutions 6 Linking of multiple Databases Commercially published Articles Hot links to subscribed e- serials,e-books Self-publishing of academic works Seamless integration of print and electronic variety of other datasets

7. Caval Collaborative Solutions 7 Purposes and Benefits E-reserves –Institutional –Consortium Different data –all Z39.50 enabled and searchable Support Learning programs on and off line Unmediated Local or Collaborative Open standards Technical convergence Cross- institutional role

8. Caval Collaborative Solutions 8 Opportunities Better service to existing students Value added for University strategies Lifelong delivery of information Value and loyalty for Alumni

9. Caval Collaborative Solutions 9 The Future “Finding the balance between collective, centralised action and local effort. In a world of shared resources on the network, it is possible to centralise more of the management, organisation and description, and preservation of content, and economic considerations encourage such centralisation. Yet there are also legitimate needs for local control and for responsiveness to local institutional needs.” Clifford Lynch February, 2000