1. ENHANCED MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK FOR IM/IT PROJECT HEALTH CHECK DASHBOARD The Enhanced Management Framework (EMF) for IM/IT, approved by the Treasury Board in 1996, is helping departments ensure that projects fully meet the needs of the business functions they are intended to support, deliver all expected benefits and are completed on time and within budget. The EMF is supported by a suite of best practices, methods and tools The Project Health Check Dashboard is designed for use by project managers, and is a more detailed and complimentary framework to the Executive Dashboard Framework. Both frameworks are based on comments received from Departments indicating those elements of importance for a snapshot report on the status of a project. These Dashboards are intended to provide a framework upon which information gathering and reporting mechanisms can be based. www.cio-dpi.gc.ca/emf-cag/index_e.asp Conseil du Trésor du Canada Secrétariat Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat Chief Information Officer Branch Direction du dirigeant principal de l’information

2. Derived from the SPMN Program Manager’s Guide to Software Acquisition Best Practices. Reference: http:/www.cio-dpi.gc.ca/emf/EMFindex_e.html Comparison of individual project health to overall portfolio management Cumulative # of tasks planned and completed over time 100 Cumulative earned value delivered (BCWP) compared to total budgeted cost (BAC) and cumulative planned value (BCWS). 1 2 Cumulative actual cost (ACWP) compared to total estimated cost at completion (EAC) 3 Current reporting time period compared to total periods budgeted 4 CPI = BCWP ACWP 5 TCPI = BAC - BCWP EAC - ACWP 6 7 8 9 Total program performance efficiency chart. Number of tasks due, completed on time, completed late & total overdue tasks last month. # modified CIs rechecked into CM last month # CIs in CM system # new & changed requirements last month # original requirements # staff leaving voluntarily last month # staff at beginning of month # overtime hours last month # base hours Risk Reserve Dollars: Total cost risk exposures compared to cost risk reserve Risk Reserve Time: Total cost risk exposures compared to cost risk reserve Total # of Severity 1 & 2 defects that are open and closed Each risk plotted in regions of high, moderate, and low risk exposure 12 13 14 15 10 11 16 17 Indicates Status Project Health Check Dashboard OK Caution Alert Ahead of Plan 17 Project #3 13 CONSEQUENCE RISK EXPOSURE RISK PROBABILITY Low Moderate High Project Specific Within PMs Control Internal to Dept. External to Dept. 14 $ DOLLARS  TIME RESERVEEXPOSURE RISK RESERVE 12 1.5% 3.0% 0% 2.0% 2.5% 1.0%.5 % 30% 60% 40% 10% 50% 20% Staff 11 Voluntary Turnover per Month Overtime per Month 3.0% 1.5% 3.0%0% CM Churn Per Month 1.5% 2.0% 2.5% 1.0%.5 % 910 CHANGE 0% Requirements Change Per Month 2.0% 1.0% 2.5%.5% Inter- dependent Project #s 16 Project Identifier Project 1 Project 2 Project 3 Project 4 Project 5 Project 6 NA Project 3 Project 2,4 Project 3 NA OK Alert... Caution OK... OK Caution Ahead... HEALTH OF OVERALL PORTFOLIO BY PROJECT Current Health of Project Potential Emerging Issue(s) Continued Business Fit From To 99 1 2 0 19 9 1 2 3 1 Reporting Period BAC EAC 0.01.02.0 3.0 ACTUAL COST (ACWP) $ millions 2 4.0 $ 0 48 12 ELAPSED TIME MONTHS  3 16 SAC PLANNED VALUE (BCWS) = Project #3 XYZ PROGRESS 0.01.02.0 3.0 EARNED VALUE (BCWP) $ millions 1 4 Cost Performance Index (CPI) 5 To-Complete Performance Index (TCPI) 1.0 PRODUCTIVITY 1.3 1.1 1.2.9.8.7 1.3.7 1.0 1.1 1.2.9.8 7 TASK COMPLETION Total Tasks Due Completed on Time Completed Late Total Overdue 2 1 8 1 50 0 40 0 28 Quality Gate Task Status This Month 8 QUALITY GATE TASKS COMPLETED TIME Schedule Slip Planned Actual TIME NOW Quarter 1 2 3 4 TASKS COMPLETED 6 ABBA CHART TOTAL PROGRAM PERFORMANCE EFFICIENCY EFFICIENCY TIME Quarter 1 2 3 4 15 Closed Open DEFECTS BY ACTIVITY DEFECTS Rqts. DesignCoding Test QUALITY