1. LCLS Transition to Science DOE Status Review of the LUSI MIE Project Update on LCLS User Proposals John Arthur, Jochen Schneider Experimental Facilities Division June 25, 2009

2. 2 J. Arthur jarthur@slac.stanford.edu 2 User Proposals Science Advisory Committee – June 25-26, 2009 Far Experimental Hall Near Experimental Hall AMO SXR XPP CXI XCS MEC 5,000 4,000 500 Photon science experiments 900 1,300 1,250 Machine studies photons 900 1,300 2,750 Machine studies electrons 1,960 2,160 4,260 Maintenance 201420132012201120102009 Tentative operation plan for LCLS [hours per fiscal year] Instruments and Tentative Operations Plan Tentative instrument operation scheme Start of commissioning, early operations 09-09AMO 08-11 XCS 05-11XCI 10-10XPP 04-10SXR MEC

3. 3 J. Arthur jarthur@slac.stanford.edu 3 User Proposals Science Advisory Committee – June 25-26, 2009 Soft X-ray Experiments at LCLS (500) 800 eV – 2 keV Available March 2010 Available August 2009

4. 4 J. Arthur jarthur@slac.stanford.edu 4 User Proposals Science Advisory Committee – June 25-26, 2009 Atomic, Molecular & Optical Science - AMO This instrument will enable the study of the interaction between the extremely intense LCLS X-ray pulses and the basic constituents of matter: atoms and molecules. » view instrument profile» view instrument profile » view technical specifications» view technical specifications Soft X-ray Materials Science - SXR This instrument will enable the high brightness and timing capability of the LCLS to be applied to scattering and imaging experiments that require the use of soft X-rays. » view instrument profile» view instrument profile » view technical specifications» view technical specifications Scientific Application Time-resolved spectroscopy and scattering with ultrafast and ultraintense soft X-rays at the LCLS Techniques X-ray Emission Spectroscopy (XES) X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy (XAS) Coherent Imaging Fourier Transform Holography Sample Environment A wide range of experimental setups in UHV and UV conditions Information on LCLS Website

5. 5 J. Arthur jarthur@slac.stanford.edu 5 User Proposals Science Advisory Committee – June 25-26, 2009 “Experiments at the AMO beamline (0.8-2 keV)” 28 proposals were received with 219 scientists from 16 countries involved, many of them in more than one. Half of the proposals were motivated by single particle imaging. 21 proposals want to use the AMO station as built, 5 proposals want to use a special chamber built in Hamburg and moved to LCLS for the experiments, 2 proposals want to use very special chambers which the groups will provide. Outcome of 1 st call for proposals Scientists Proposals Scientists Proposals Australia 4Ireland 1 China 2Italy 8 Czech Republic 4Japan 6 Denmark 1Netherlands 4 Finland 1Poland 3 France 1Sweden26 3 Germany708United Kingdom 1 India 41United States8316

6. 6 J. Arthur jarthur@slac.stanford.edu 6 User Proposals Science Advisory Committee – June 25-26, 2009 Review of Proposals Members of Proposal Review Panel Christine Back (San Diego)Janos Kirz (LBNL) Maged Chergui (ETH Lausanne)Dwayne Miller (Toronto) Lew Cocke (Kansas)Juerg Osterwalder (University of Zuerich) Gianluca Gregori (Oxford, UK)Metin Tolan (University of Dortmund) Chi-Chang Kao (BNL)Kyoshi Ueda (Tohku University, Sendai) Steve Kevan (Oregon)Edgar Weckert (DESY) Two representatives of LCLS management without voting rights: Jerry Hastings Jochen Schneider For the 1 st meeting dealing mainly with proposals for AMO experiments three guests with voting rights were invited: Chris Greene (JILA) Jon Marangos (Imperial College London) Ian McNulty (APS, Argonne Nat. Lab.) First Meeting December 3-4, 2008

7. 7 J. Arthur jarthur@slac.stanford.edu 7 User Proposals Science Advisory Committee – June 25-26, 2009 Results of 1 st PRP Meeting Taking the above recommendations into account there were 23 “scientific” proposals for about 225 8 hour shifts starting September 1, 2009. The PRP allocated the following rankings to these proposals: Ranking 1: 11 proposals, including two with specific instrumentation Ranking 2: 5 proposals, including one “team proposal” Ranking 3: 2 proposals Ranking 4: 5 proposals 10 experiments scheduled 7 experiments use the AMO instrument as built by LCLS, 3 experiments use the CAMP chamber built by CFEL in Hamburg 3 “more technical” proposals were recommended to be included in early commissioning work In 2 cases it was recommended to combine two, so far separate proposals with similar scientific goals 2 single purpose experiments got highest ranking and were invited to discuss the technical implications for integrating the experiments into beamline at a later stage

8. 8 J. Arthur jarthur@slac.stanford.edu 8 User Proposals Science Advisory Committee – June 25-26, 2009 The 10 Experiments Scheduled for 2009 1.Linda Young (Argonne NL) Tracking transient atomic states produced by ultraintense X-ray pulses 2.Louis DiMauro (Ohio State Univ.) Strong-field multiphoton processes in the high-frequency limit 3.Nora Berrah (Western Michigan Univ.) X-ray non-linear physics studies of molecules with intense ultrafast LCLS pulses 4.Ryan Coffee (PULSE-SLAC) X-ray multiple ionization of impulsively aligned molecules 5.Linda Young (Argonne NL) Resonant nonlinear X-ray processes at high X-ray intensity

9. 9 J. Arthur jarthur@slac.stanford.edu 9 User Proposals Science Advisory Committee – June 25-26, 2009 The 10 Experiments Scheduled for 2009 6.John Bozek (LCLS) IR laser and FEL X-ray pulse cross correlation using electron energy sidebands Stefan Duesterer (DESY) Dressed photo- and Auger-electrons in intense superposed X-ray and optical laser fields and their application on timing 7.Todd Ditmire (Austin, Texas) Explosions of clusters in intense X-ray pulses 8.Christoph Bostedt (TU Berlin) Ultrafast imaging of X-ray excited clusters 9.Henry Chapman (CFEL-DESY), Jochen Kuepper (ASG MPG) Diffractive imaging of oriented molecules in the gas phase 10.Henry Chapman (CFEL-DESY) Coherent diffractive imaging

10. 10 J. Arthur jarthur@slac.stanford.edu 10 User Proposals Science Advisory Committee – June 25-26, 2009 AMO Commissioning/Operations Schedule John Bozek

11. 11 J. Arthur jarthur@slac.stanford.edu 11 User Proposals Science Advisory Committee – June 25-26, 2009 Outcome of 2 nd call for proposals “Experiments at the AMO and SXR beamlines (0.8-2 keV)” 62 proposals were received with 469 scientists from 15 countries involved, many of them in more than one. 24 proposals want to use the AMO, 38 proposals the SXR beamline. At the AMO beamline, 15 proposals want to use the AMO instrument as built by LCLS, 9 proposals want to use the CAMP chamber built by CFEL in Hamburg. At the SXR beamline, experimental stations will be provided by members of the SXR Consortium and used in collaboration with these groups. More specific, 11 of the proposals want to use the CAMP chamber. Scientists Proposals Scientists Proposals Australia 5Italy 20 1 Canada 1Japan 9 Denmark 1Netherlands 5 1 Finland 1Sweden 42 5 France 33 1Switzerland 9 1 Germany11819United Kingdom 41 3 India 3 1United States17730 Ireland 4

12. 12 J. Arthur jarthur@slac.stanford.edu 12 User Proposals Science Advisory Committee – June 25-26, 2009 Next PRP Meeting 27-28 July Members of Proposal Review Panel Christine Back (San Diego)Janos Kirz (LBNL) Maged Chergui (ETH Lausanne)Dwayne Miller (Toronto) Lew Cocke (Kansas)Juerg Osterwalder (University of Zuerich) Gianluca Gregori (Oxford, UK)Metin Tolan (University of Dortmund) Chi-Chang Kao (BNL)Kyoshi Ueda (Tohku University, Sendai) Steve Kevan (Oregon)Edgar Weckert (DESY) Two representatives of LCLS management without voting rights: Jerry Hastings Jochen Schneider Guest with voting rights invited: Marc Vrakking (FOM Inst for Atomic & Molecular Physics, Amsterdam) External referees asked to help with science review of proposals (send reports by early July): Steve Kahn (SLAC), Steve Boxer (Stanford), Louise Johnson (Oxford), Wolfgang Eberhardt (BESSY), Hajo Tjen (Univ Cologne), Gabriel Aeppli (Ctr for Nanotechnology London), Howard Padmore (ALS), Markus Drescher (Univ Hamburg), Ian Robinson (Ctr for Nanotechnology London), Giancarlo Ruocco (Univ Rome “La Sapienza”), Juerg Osterwalder (Univ Zurich), John Costello (Univ Dublin), Lew Cocke (Univ Kansas), Jan-Michael Rost (MPI Dresden), Christian Schroer (TU Dresden), Hrvoje Petek (Univ Pittsburg)

13. 13 J. Arthur jarthur@slac.stanford.edu 13 User Proposals Science Advisory Committee – June 25-26, 2009 CAMP Chamber Built by CFEL CFEL-ASG Multi-Purpose chamber – CAMP adapted for the use of unique large-area, single-photon counting pnCCD detectors from Max Planck Institute Halbleiterlabor pnCCD

14. 14 J. Arthur jarthur@slac.stanford.edu 14 User Proposals Science Advisory Committee – June 25-26, 2009 Future Proposals Next closing date: October 1, 2009 Repeat on 6-month cycle….

15. 15 J. Arthur jarthur@slac.stanford.edu 15 User Proposals Science Advisory Committee – June 25-26, 2009 End of Presentation