1. David Schultz Accelerator ReadinessDCS@SLAC.Stanford.edu Nov. 12, ‘08 SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory 1 Accelerator Readiness ARR scheduled for Dec. 2-4 The desire is to run beam the following week. Working closely with the SSO and the committee to make this happen. NameAffiliationPrimary Responsibility Bob Casey (Chair)BNLESH, Radiological Mike BuckleyBNLConduct of Ops, QA Ian EvansORNLESH, Training, Operations Jim FloydLBLESH, Training, Operations John ForrestalANLInterlocks Bob HettelSLACAccelerator operations PK JobBNLRadiological Greg MarkovichANLInterlocks Committee:

2. David Schultz Accelerator ReadinessDCS@SLAC.Stanford.edu Nov. 12, ‘08 SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory 2 ARR assignments

3. David Schultz Accelerator ReadinessDCS@SLAC.Stanford.edu Nov. 12, ‘08 SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory 3 ARR Lines of Inquiry (from the chairman) The ARR will verify that: An acceptable SAD has been properly developed in accordance with DOE O 420.2B requirements, and has been reviewed and approved in accordance with the SLAC internal safety review system. Casey An adequate ASE has been developed in accordance with the ASO and is supported by the SAD. Casey - general Hettel – operational requirements adequately defined Job – radiation safety requirements adequately defined An appropriate commissioning plan has been developed. Casey - general Hettel – operational plans consistent with SAD and ASE requirements Job – radiation assessments to confirm adequacy of shields and beam dumps for normal and abnormal conditions An appropriate USI process has been developed. Casey Procedures necessary for the safe operation of the activity have been developed, reviewed, and approved, and an appropriate process for the development, review and approval of new and revised procedures is in place. Hettel – are adequate procedures to conduct undulator complex commissioning and fault studies in place Job – are adequate procedures in place for fault studies; radiation monitoring, beam containment systems testing, certification and configuration control Markovich, Forrestal – are adequate procedures in place for search and secure; interlock testing, certification and configuration control Evans – ODH & electrical safety Floyd – ISM processes, including work planning, review and approval of facility mods; management of safety related changes Buckley – conduct of operations program; process for development, review and approval of new and revised procedures Procedures to deal with abnormal and emergency situations have been prepared and are approved for use. Evans – ODH, fire, radiation, electrical, medical Hettel – Main control room response Now assigning SLAC contacts.

4. David Schultz Accelerator ReadinessDCS@SLAC.Stanford.edu Nov. 12, ‘08 SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory 4 ARR agenda 12/2 am:Plenary pm:Interviews and walkdowns 12/3 am:Interviews and walkdowns pm:Exec. session 12/4 am:Exec. session Closeout pm:Report preparation ARR web link   

5. David Schultz Accelerator ReadinessDCS@SLAC.Stanford.edu Nov. 12, ‘08 SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory 5 SAD and ASE SLAC-I-010-30100-000_lafase_text_r001 SLAC-I-010-30100-016_lclsundcomplexsad_text_r000

6. David Schultz Accelerator ReadinessDCS@SLAC.Stanford.edu Nov. 12, ‘08 SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory 6 LCLS Undulator Complex Commissioning Preparedness Document aka Commissioning Plan Appendix A: Sign-off for staff with responsibility for engineering, installation, safety and operations to verify that all required systems are ready for electron beam commissioning. Appendix B: The review process used during LCLS Undulator Complex engineering. Safety and oversight reviews are discussed, and field inspections by Safety Officers and committees are documented. Appendix C: Procedures and training required for operation and maintenance of LCLS Undulator Complex commissioning. Appendix D: Plans for beamline commissioning. Beamline component checkout, system training for Operators and the schedule for operations, including radiation measurements. Appendix E: Draft Beam Authorization Sheet for the LCLS Undulator Complex.

7. David Schultz Accelerator ReadinessDCS@SLAC.Stanford.edu Nov. 12, ‘08 SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory 7 Outstanding Issues (11-5-08) B4C laser stopper Testing plan to establish viability. Fire safety check-off Fire systems commissioning through 11/14 BCS certification Scheduled to start 11/26 Preparedness document sign-off Final signatures are last-minute

8. David Schultz Accelerator ReadinessDCS@SLAC.Stanford.edu Nov. 12, ‘08 SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory 8 Conclusion We know who the examiners are. We know what questions they will be asking. We know who will answer which question. We ought to be able to pass this test.