1. 2012 Business Plan Operations and Development Services

2. 2011 Successes North Lougheed Land Use Study New Zoning Bylaw Secondary Suites Legalization Adaptable Housing Policy & Regulation New Pesticide Bylaw New ½ time Bylaw Enforcement Officer Water Meter Replacement/Upgrades Initiated South Bonson Land Sale EOI Lougheed Highway Sound Fence Haney Main No. 1 abandoned Synchronization of traffic signals with CP rail crossing Speed Reader signs

3. 2011 Successes cont’d ReadingsCovertDisplay On Average40 km/hr38 km/hr 85 th Percentile55 km/hr45 km/hr Highest95 km/hr85 km/hr Speed Reader Signs Park Road

4. Significant Issues & Trends Transportation – Harris and Lougheed Intersection – Pedestrian & cycling safety – Accessibility – Shifting traffic volumes

6. Significant Issues & Trends cont’d Regional Plan Compliance RGS LWMP SWMP North Lougheed Special Study Area Garden/Secondary Suites Housing Action Plan New Regional Context Statement Disposal Costs/Tipping Fees Diversion Rates Organics Wood waste EPR Treatment Costs Private sewer lateral inspections Rates and charges

7. Significant Issues & Trends cont’d Development – Construction Value 2002-2012

8. Significant Issues & Trends cont’d Development – Planning Revenue 2006-2012

9. Significant Issues & Trends cont’d Enforcement Revenue 2002 - 2012

10. Significant Issues & Trends cont’d Storm Drainage Utility – Vegetation Management Aquatic Invasive species – Aging Infrastructure – Grants – Public Expectations

11. Significant Issues & Trends cont’d Katzie Slough

12. Significant Issues & Trends cont’d Storm Drainage Utility

13. Significant Issues & Trends cont’d Water Utility – Consumption – Metering/Billing – Rates/Life Cycle Costing – Backflow Prevention – Quality Control

14. Significant Issues & Trends cont’d Sewer Utility – Wet Weather Infiltration – Fats, Oils & Grease Build Up – Regional Treatment Plant Upgrades – Regional Treatment Costs

15. 2012 Actions North Lougheed Land Use Plan Rannie Road Negotiations Urban Bee Keeping Policy Review RFP for South Bonson Land Sale Cross Connection Control Program Roll out (multi-year) Fleet Management Policy Garden/Secondary Suite Program Roll Out (multi-year)

16. 2012 Actions 16 Regional Plan Compliance Related Actions – Housing Action Plan – Regional Context Statement – Organics Collection/Solid Waste Education – Garbage & Recycling Development Permit Area Guidelines for MF – Private Sewer Lateral Inspection Process – Demo & Building Permit Recycling Regulations

17. 2012 Actions 17 Capital Highlights – Drainage McKechnie Drainage Area Improvements – Carry Forward Baynes Road Pump (1) Replacement Katzie Slough Environmental Review/Slough Cleaning Protocol (Multi-year) Design for Pump Station No. 4 Replacement GEB Culvert Deficiencies - Ongoing – Fleet Utility Truck Replacement Service Truck Replacement John Deere Mower Replacement – Sanitary Sewer 114B Sewer Lift Station Replacement Sanitary Sewer Condition Video SCADA Upgrades (Multi-year)

18. 2012 Actions 18 Capital Highlights – Roads Kennedy Road Repave (Lougheed to Ferry Slip Road) Thompson Road Bridge Replacement – Water Blakely Road Water Main Replacement (120B to 119 th St) Rural Water Meter Replacements (Multi-year) Ford Road Water Main Replacement (191B to 188 th Avenue) Sheridan Hill Booster Station Replacement Unilateral flushing modeling software

19. Proposed Operating Budget

20. Pedestrian Activated Signal $80,000 – Harris Rd/Civic Centre Bikeway and Pedestrian Master Plan $35,000 Decision Packages

21. Decision Packages Cont’d Weekly Curbside Organics Collection Option 1Contractor provides carts$21 per household Option 2City provides the carts$23 per household Option 3Status Quo (no organics) $14 per household Option 4Bi-weekly Garbage City provides the Carts $2 per household Assumptions: mid-year start in 2012; carts amortized over 10 years; no longer subsidize drop–off green waste

22. Solid Waste Disposal Costs Disposal – Regional tipping fees - $223,100/year 2008201120122013201420152016 $68$97$107$121$153$182$205 Regional Tipping Fee Forecast

23. Decision Packages Cont’d Organics Collection ISWRMP Develop and implement work plan for diversion of organics including food waste from all sectors by: SF 2012 MF & ICI 2015

24. TODAY 2012 2015? ISWRMP Vision

25. Cost Scenarios for Residential Organics Collection - Scenario 1 – Weekly Garbage/ Recycling/Organics Contractor provides totes and delivers 2 year contract extension required Disposal costs reduced due to diversion Green waste disposal no longer subsidized Includes enhanced public education budget Mid year start up in 2012 An additional $21 per household per year

26. Cost Scenarios for Residential Organics Collection - Scenario 2 – Weekly Garbage/ Recycling/Organics City purchases totes and contractor delivers Capital cost of totes amortized over 10 years No contract extension – new contract 2014 Green waste disposal no longer subsidized Includes enhanced public education budget Mid year start up in 2012 An additional $23 per household per year

27. Cost Scenarios for Residential Organics Collection - Scenario 3 – Status Quo – No Curbside Organics Collection Service levels remain the same No offset for cost of disposal Green waste drop–off subsidy continues New contract in 2014 An additional $14 per household per year

28. Cost Scenarios for Residential Organics Collection - Scenario 4 – Bi-weekly Garbage; weekly Recycling/Organics City purchases totes and contractor delivers Capital cost of totes amortized over 10 years No contract extension Disposal costs reduced due to diversion Green waste disposal no longer subsidized Includes enhanced public education budget An additional $2 per household per year

29. Decision Packages Cont’d Weekly Curbside Organics Collection Option 1Contractor provides carts$21 per household Option 2City provides the carts$23 per household Option 3Status Quo (no organics) $14 per household Option 4Bi-weekly Garbage City provides the Carts $2 per household Assumptions: mid-year start in 2012; carts amortized over 10 years; no longer subsidize drop–off green waste + $5  To continue to subsidize green waste drop-off would need to charge an additional $5 per household

30. Discussion