Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Innovating Within Bureaucracies

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Innovating Within Bureaucracies"— Presentation transcript:

1 Innovating Within Bureaucracies
Eric Rice, PhD Johns Hopkins University

2 Typical Universities (and other bureaucracies)
College Institutes Departments Centers

3 Center for Leadership Education
2010 ~ 1200 students/semester 6 Full-time Faculty ~ 48 Courses Entrepreneurship & Management Minor Professional Writing Program Salant Investment Team Business Plan Competition ( ~ 40 Teams) Hopkins Student Enterprises (3)

4 Center for Leadership Education
Mission Statement Provide quality instruction to prepare students to create, manage, and lead enterprises. Support academic department and research centers. Help develop an entrepreneurial culture in the JHU community.

5 Model 1: Center for Leadership Education
Model of Change Model 1: Center for Leadership Education Traditional Bureaucracy Bureaucracy Change Unit Departmental Structures Disciplinary and Departmental Center for Leadership Education

6 Center for Leadership Education
2014 ~ 1700 students/semester 11 Full-time Faculty ~ 86 Courses Entrepreneurship & Management Minor Marketing & Communications Minor Master of Science in Engineering Management Program Professional Development Program Salant Investment Team Business Plan Competition (~ 85 Teams) Oral Presentations Contest Internship Program Hopkins Student Enterprises (5-6) Hopkins Social Enterprises (5-6)

7 A Model for Academic-Based Innovation
Youseph Yazdi, PhD, MBA Executive Director Center for Bioengineering Innovation & Design Program Director Johns Hopkins – Coulter Translational Partnership Assistant Professor, Johns Hopkins Dept of Biomedical Engineering Assistant Professor, Johns Hopkins Carey Business School

8 the education and development of
Our Mission the education and development of the next generation of leaders in healthcare innovation And the creation and early-stage development of healthcare solutions that have a transformational impact on human health around the world. ~ Our key measure of success is the positive impact our students and our technologies have on the quality and accessibility of healthcare. Thank you for the invitation to speak to you about an exciting new effort underway at JHU. My name is Youseph Yazdi, and I’m the Exec Director of the CBID at JHU. I’d like to take a few minutes to tell you about our new center, the motivation behind it, and the successes we’ve had so far. Then, I’d like to tell you about our new Global Health Innovation program, and the motivations behind that. It too has been a great success in a very short period of time. I’m not a typical academic, having joined the faculty 2 years ago after 12 years at J&J. I tell you a little about my own background because it touches on themes central to CBID. I started out at Rice… father … advice … bridge. So I became a biomedical engineer, and by and large in practice engineering in our industry has honored that calling. But in academia, there has been a shift away from that, driven by the billions of NSF and NIH funding that drives the frontiers of new science and technology, but not translating that into practical benefits to society. It’s increadibly valueable work, but that’s not a bridge, more of a pier. At J&J I went through roles in R&D and BizDev, and then the COSAT. One of my roles there was to build an open innovation network, focused on incubators and academics. How many here have done that kind of technology scouting? My experience was that in 90% of cases, even the coolest sci/tech was not relevant to comm. Because it was not done with the intent to commercialize, rather to publish, and get the next grant. Our center, CBID, is fundamentally different and as you will see, a center within academia based on methods and objectives industry would find more relevant. ***

9 ~20 Medical Innovation Projects
Each Year: ~20 Medical Innovation Projects (~8 Global Health) ~100 Students ~ 40 Clinicians

10 bedside to bench to bedside
Our model differs fundamentally from traditional academic-based innovation not tech transfer not bench to bedside bedside to bench to bedside innovation partnerships

11 The traditional academic model … Bench to Bedside

12 The traditional academic model … Bench to Bedside

13 Full Range of Perspectives Needed – How? What Order?
Organizational, Strategic Clinical Finance and Resourcing Health Care Worker, Physician, Surgeon People – Team Strategic Decisions Patient, Family Health Care Facility, Provider Commercial Technical, Design Solution Specification Reimbursement, Payer Evaluation, Verification Solution Concepts and Development Competitive Landscape Regulatory, Compliance Technology Development Manufacturability to Scale

14 Traditional Bench to Bedside Model:
Often Misses the Mark after Much Expense Technical - Design Clinical Commercial Organizational - Strategic Reimbursement, Payer Finance and Resourcing People – Team Health Care Worker, Physician Solution Spec and Concepts Idea, Concept, IP Creation, Development Strategic Decisions Intel Property, Competitive Landscape Health Care Facility, Provider Regulatory, Compliance Evaluation, Verification Patient, Family Copyright Youseph Yazdi 2013

15 The Stanford Biodesign Model: Identify  Invent  Implement
Much Better, Develop Deep Understanding of Need Early On Technical - Design Clinical Health Care Worker, Physician Solution Spec and Concepts Idea, Concept, IP Creation, Development Health Care Facility, Provider Patient, Family Evaluation, Verification Intel Property, Competitive Landscape Commercial Reimbursement, Payer Regulatory, Compliance People – Team Finance and Resourcing Organizational - Strategic Copyright Youseph Yazdi 2013

16 Often Can’t Rely on Initial Understanding – Need a Cyclical Approach
Organizational – Strategic Clinical Commercial Technical - Design learn & grow your understanding of problem… of customers… of your solution Copyright Youseph Yazdi 2013

17 Consider these to be a space that must eventually be explored fully
Organizational – Strategic Clinical Time and Cost Time and Cost Commercial Technical - Design Copyright Youseph Yazdi 2013

18 Need to Invest Time/Funds in All Topic Areas
Strategic Decisions Organizational – Strategic Patient, Family Clinical Finance and Resourcing Health Care Worker, Physician Health Care Facility, Provider People – Team Time and Cost Time and Cost Evaluation, Verification Reimbursement, Payer Commercial Technical - Design Regulatory, Compliance Idea, Concept, IP Creation, Development Intel Property, Competitive Landscape Solution Spec and Concepts Copyright Youseph Yazdi 2013

19 Too Much to Do at Once – Build Up Knowledge of Each Quadrant
Strategic Decisions Organizational – Strategic Patient, Family Clinical Finance and Resourcing Health Care Worker, Physician Health Care Facility, Provider People – Team Time and Cost Time and Cost Evaluation, Verification Reimbursement, Payer Commercial Technical - Design Regulatory, Compliance Idea, Concept, IP Creation, Development Intel Property, Competitive Landscape Solution Spec and Concepts Copyright Youseph Yazdi 2013

20 Too Much to Do at Once – And Build on That, Iteratively
Strategic Decisions Organizational – Strategic Patient, Family Clinical Finance and Resourcing Health Care Worker, Physician Health Care Facility, Provider People – Team Time and Cost Time and Cost Evaluation, Verification Reimbursement, Payer Commercial Technical - Design Regulatory, Compliance Idea, Concept, IP Creation, Development Intel Property, Competitive Landscape Solution Spec and Concepts Copyright Youseph Yazdi 2013

21 More of a Spiral-Iterative Model
Strategic Decisions Organizational – Strategic Patient, Family Clinical Finance and Resourcing Health Care Worker, Physician Health Care Facility, Provider People – Team Time and Cost Time and Cost Evaluation, Verification Reimbursement, Payer Commercial Technical - Design Regulatory, Compliance Idea, Concept, IP Creation, Development Intel Property, Competitive Landscape Solution Spec and Concepts Copyright Youseph Yazdi 2013

22 Our Model: Careful, Efficient Resource Allocation
Organizational - Strategic Clinical your investment in understanding clinical needs Time and Cost Time and Cost Technical - Design Commercial Copyright Youseph Yazdi 2013

23 Our Model: Careful, Efficient Resource Allocation
Organizational - Strategic Clinical your investment in understanding clinical needs Time and Cost Time and Cost your investment in understanding commercial value Technical - Design Commercial Copyright Youseph Yazdi 2013

24 Our Model: Careful, Efficient Resource Allocation
Organizational - Strategic Clinical your investment in understanding clinical needs Time and Cost Time and Cost your investment in developing solution your investment in understanding commercial value Technical - Design Commercial Copyright Youseph Yazdi 2013

25 Our Model: Careful, Efficient Resource Allocation
Organizational - Strategic Clinical your investment in organizational and strategic alignment your investment in understanding clinical needs Time and Cost Time and Cost your investment in developing solution your investment in understanding commercial value Technical - Design Commercial Copyright Youseph Yazdi 2013

26 Our Model: Careful, Efficient Resource Allocation
Organizational - Strategic Clinical go, modify, pivot, kill? your investment in organizational and strategic alignment your investment in understanding clinical needs Time and Cost Time and Cost your investment in developing solution your investment in understanding commercial value Technical - Design Commercial Copyright Youseph Yazdi 2013

27 Our Model: Careful, Efficient Resource Allocation
Organizational - Strategic Clinical go, modify, pivot, kill? your investment in organizational and strategic alignment your investment in understanding clinical needs Time and Cost Time and Cost your investment in developing solution your investment in understanding commercial value Technical - Design Commercial Copyright Youseph Yazdi 2013

28 Time and Cost Time and Cost Copyright Youseph Yazdi 2013

29 Implementation /Sustainability
Health Care Impact Time and Cost Time and Cost Implementation /Sustainability Copyright Youseph Yazdi 2013

30 Global Health Innovation:
Low cost, High Value, Frugal Innovation

31 Iterate and Build Insights on all Stakeholders
Over 12 Months: Iterate and Build Insights on all Stakeholders Commercial: Courses: Insight Informed Innovation, Business of Biomedical Innovation Results: business plans developed, including regulatory, reimbursement, investment Technical: multiple iterations of looks-like and works-like prototypes Provisionals filed, IP strategy outlined Clinical: Insights from multiple clinical immersions and end users Pre-clinical evaluations of several concepts Organizational: Startup options decided, follow-on team created Funding pipeline developed

32 Example: CBID & Medtronic Partnership Launched June 2013
Identify and implement new ways to make pacemakers accessible in low-resource settings, specifically India Premium Value Underserved Collaboration between students at Johns Hopkins Center for Bioengineering, Innovation and Design (CBID) and Medtronic PURPOSE: Identify products and/or procedure changes that make pacemaker therapy more accessible for AV block patients in underserved communities. Target area is India Team of 6-8 students chosen to participate Medtronic to provide $200K, domain knowledge and ~5 scientists/engineers to act as mentors and educators One year project will begin in July 2013 Students to spend 3-6 weeks in India doing clinical rotations and research; Medtronic employee mentors will also be on the ground in India for this segment of the project Team to research solutions, then identify 1-2 ideas for further development In early 2014, team will construct prototypes and obtain further evidence (such as preliminary animal data) to support the viability of their concepts After completion, Medtronic may choose to license the idea for further development Increase Access Enable Innovation Explore Solutions Joint CBID-MDT teams: clinical immersions at JHU and India, development of needs specs, concepts, iterative development

33 Partnerships with Johns Hopkins CBID:
Shared journey starting with needs identification and specification Shared concept generation Shared development of solutions Shared mentorship and education of students Shared financial support for projects and program

34

35

36 EMERGENCY EBOLA DESIGN CHALLENGE: personal Protection Gear
OCT 24,25,26 With support from: Thank you for the invitation to speak to you about an exciting new effort underway at JHU. My name is Youseph Yazdi, and I’m the Exec Director of the CBID at JHU. I’d like to take a few minutes to tell you about our new center, the motivation behind it, and the successes we’ve had so far. Then, I’d like to tell you about our new Global Health Innovation program, and the motivations behind that. It too has been a great success in a very short period of time. I’m not a typical academic, having joined the faculty 2 years ago after 12 years at J&J. I tell you a little about my own background because it touches on themes central to CBID. I started out at Rice… father … advice … bridge. So I became a biomedical engineer, and by and large in practice engineering in our industry has honored that calling. But in academia, there has been a shift away from that, driven by the billions of NSF and NIH funding that drives the frontiers of new science and technology, but not translating that into practical benefits to society. It’s increadibly valueable work, but that’s not a bridge, more of a pier. At J&J I went through roles in R&D and BizDev, and then the COSAT. One of my roles there was to build an open innovation network, focused on incubators and academics. How many here have done that kind of technology scouting? My experience was that in 90% of cases, even the coolest sci/tech was not relevant to comm. Because it was not done with the intent to commercialize, rather to publish, and get the next grant. Our center, CBID, is fundamentally different and as you will see, a center within academia based on methods and objectives industry would find more relevant. ***

37

38

39

40 Summary Concepts for Rapid and Safer Doffing, Cooling, Comfort of PPE

41 Key Insights: Can’t be done without strong partnerships Develop and test hypotheses efficiently Iterate! No one knows the whole picture at outset Include broad range of perspectives, even the silent ones genchi genbutsu 現地現物 “Go see. Ask why. Show respect.” Bring in “later stage” voices early

42 Thank you. Join Us! jhu.edu

43 Leveraging university drivers to scale emerging initiatives
Innovating within universities: a guide to navigating the university environment to build impactful programming, initiatives, and organizations Leveraging university drivers to scale emerging initiatives Kunal Parikh Social Innovation Lab Johns Hopkins University

44 2012

45 2015

46 Integrate coursework, research, and application
Break silos and support collaboration Finance institution building Impact global health Attract talented students and staff Educational excellence Environmental sustainability Strengthen community partnerships Bring the benefits of discovery to the world Recruit and retain “star faculty members

47 VISION ONE UNIVERSITY

48 EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING

49 Today, however, is a different story
Today, however, is a different story. Baltimore’s economy transformed from a manufacturing into a service economy. Today, Baltimore has one of the ten highest crime rates in the country. 25% of its individuals live in poverty, thousands of people are homeless, and many more have little or no access to healthcare. BUILDING BALTIMORE

50 TRANSLATION $6.5B $3.4B $1.88B 2,324 ~22,000 ~3,500 75 $16.5M
Operating Revenue $3.4B Endowment $1.88B Federal Research Funding 2,324 Patents Issued ~22,000 Students ~3,500 Faculty Members VISION 75 University-licensed Startups ( ) $16.5M Tech Transfer Revenue (2014) TRANSLATION

51 45 13 35 11 22 6 12 6 Applications Finalists Selection Committee
Student-led 11 Student-led 22 Women-led 6 Women-led 12 Interdisciplinary 6 Interdisciplinary VISION Carey SOM SPH SAIS Homewood Carey SOM SPH SAIS Homewood

52 VISION

53 Integrate coursework, research, and application
Break silos and support collaboration Finance institution building Impact global health Attract talented students and staff Educational excellence Environmental sustainability Strengthen community partnerships Bring the benefits of discovery to the world Recruit and retain “star faculty members

54 EDUCATION NETWORK KNOWLEDGE SPACE SERVICES
Partner Institutions Community Experts “Mind Your Business” EDUCATION SocEnt Breakfast TechBreakfast Current/Past Teams SIL Leaders NETWORK City/State Government KNOWLEDGE SPACE Coworking FUNDING Harbor City Partners Foundation/Grants SERVICES MICA PwC PNC DLA Piper Bowie & Jensen VISION

55 Thank You OUTCOMES Kunal Parikh thesocialinnovationlab.org


Download ppt "Innovating Within Bureaucracies"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google