Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Shabnam Lashkari Matthew Petering Yong Wu

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Shabnam Lashkari Matthew Petering Yong Wu"— Presentation transcript:

1 Shabnam Lashkari Matthew Petering Yong Wu
Sequencing Triple-Spreader Crane Operations: Mathematical Formulation and Genetic Algorithm Shabnam Lashkari Matthew Petering Yong Wu

2 Outline Introduction Problem Description Mathematical Model
Genetic Algorithm Experimental results Conclusion

3 Container Shipping

4 Container Shipping World fleet, Feb 2004: vessels, capacity = million 20-ft conts. (TEU) World fleet, Dec 2008: vessels, capacity = 12.1 million 20-ft conts. (TEU) World fleet, Dec 2012: vessels, capacity = 15.4 million 20-ft conts. (TEU) The motivation TEU stands for Twenty-Foot Equivalent Unit which can be used to measure a ship's cargo carrying capacity

5 Problem Description Stack 5 3 2 7 6 9 4 1 8 Tier

6 Triple Spreader Quay Crane

7 Mathematical Model Objective value:
Source:

8 Constructive heuristic
Heuristic Approach Our overall method consists of a constructive heuristic embedded within a genetic algorithm (GA) metaheuristic. Constructive heuristic Stage 1 Stage 2 Build feasible crane sequences using math model. Iteratively generate solutions, keep the bests, mutate some, cross over most. Construct a feasible crane lift by iteratively removing containers.

9 Illustrative Instance
Handling Times: Single lift= 1.5 min Double lift = 1.8 min Triple lift = 2.2 min Changeover time = 2.7 min Start with double spreader Weight limits: Dual spreader = 10 Triple spreader = 12 4 double spreader lifts 4*1.8 = 7.2 min changeover = 2.7 min 4 single spreader lifts 4*1.5 = 6 min Changeover = 2.7 min 4 triple spreader lifts 4*2.2 = 8.8 minutes Finished Makespan=27.4 minutes

10 GA Setup GA was tested on 120 instances of different sizes: 3x8 5x10
Small Medium Large Very large 3x8 Light Medium Heavy 5x10 Light Medium Heavy 10x23 Light Medium Heavy 50x50 Light Medium Heavy Problem Size 3 x 8 5 x 10 10 x 23 50 x 50 Computational time limit (sec) 30 120 600

11 Results (averages) CPLEX LB 3x8L 3x8M 3x8H 5x10L 5x10M 5x10H N/A
Instance CPLEX LB 3x8L 27.3 30.4 9.68% 26.2 4.20% 3x8M 31.7 33.8 10.83% 30.1 5.25% 3x8H 34.3 36.4 5.68% 32.0 7.13% 5x10L 53.6 51.8 57.9 10.49% 49.2 5.36% 5x10M 65.7 64.1 69.7 8.01% 59 8.64% 5x10H 71.7 70.7 73.8 9.42% 66.8 5.88% 10x23L N/A 227.5 232.7 2.19% 205.6 10.65% 10x23M 271.6 277.9 2.23% 247.9 9.61% 10x23H 311.3 317 1.79% 294.6 5.67% 50x50L N/A 2362.7 2398.5 1.50% 2177.6 8.50% 50x50M 2816 2837.9 0.77% 2635.1 6.86% 50x50H 3253.7 3295.8 1.28% 3098.9 4.99%

12 Conclusion This work is a new crane scheduling problem inspired by the triple-spreader quay crane. We formulated the problem as a mixed-integer linear program. We developed a lower bound on the optimal value. We devised a GA for handling large problem instances. GA outperforms CPLEX across all problem sizes. GA obtains solutions within 8% of optimal in most cases.

13 Thank you!


Download ppt "Shabnam Lashkari Matthew Petering Yong Wu"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google