Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Xiaofei Sun, Mark A. Spalding

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Xiaofei Sun, Mark A. Spalding"— Presentation transcript:

1 Xiaofei Sun, Mark A. Spalding
Optimization of Maddock-Style Mixers for Single-Screw Extrusion Feb, 2019 Xiaofei Sun, Mark A. Spalding The Dow Chemical Company, Midland, MI Timothy W. Womer TWWomer and Associates, LLC, Edinburg, PA Ned Uzelac Performance Feed Screw Inc., Mississauga, ON, Canada

2 INTRODUCTION

3 Goals Develop guidelines for the flute geometry with the goal of mitigating resin degradation and undispersed gels Investigated three major design factors of a Maddock mixer using 3D finite element numerical simulation Flute channel depth Mixing flight undercut Flute lead length

4 Maddock Mixer Invented by Gene LeRoy at the Union Carbide Corporation (UCC) Research Center, and was perfected by Bruce Maddock in 1973 Used to trap, melt, and disperse solid polymer fragments Constructed by placing flute pairs with an undercut positioned between them.

5 Flute Channel Depth---Resin Degradation
Mixer with excessive channel depth – flutes are too deep causing long residence time and resin degradation. Well designed mixer – flute depth is half the width of the flute. Short residence times and no resin degradation.

6 Mixing Flight Undercut – Entangled Gels
(stress smeared) Entangled gels are due to entangled molecular chains that solidify first when cooled, appearing like unmelted resin. Stress disentangles the chains. A stress of 200 kPa or above is needed for PE A undercut of 1% of barrel diameter may not provide sufficient shear stress in many circumstances Shear stress can be increased by reducing mixing flight undercut 𝝉M is the stress for flow over the mixing flight. Page 6

7 MIXER DESIGNS & SIMULATION SETUP

8 Mixer Designs Mixer 1 Mixer 2 Mixer 3 Mixer 4 Flute lead length (mm)
straight 345 Mixing undercut (mm) 0.46 0.76 Flute depth (mm) 12.3 11.0 12.8 Flute width (mm) 24.6 22.2 Depth/width ratio 0.5 0.6 Mixer 1 Mixer 2

9 Extrusion Conditions Simulated the polymer flow from the mixing section toward the end of the screw tip in a 63.5 mm barrel diameter single-screw extruder Screw speed: 70 rpm Rate: 50.8 kg/h Specific rate: 0.73 kg/(h·rpm) Barrel temperature: 220°C Entry condition: 220°C, 19.3 MPa

10 Simulation Setup Mass, momentum, and energy balance equations were solved by StarCCM+ using screw rotation physics Resin layer discretized to 5.5 to 6 million elements Assumptions: non-isothermal laminar flow Incompressible polymer melt the influences of inertia, gravity, and elasticity of the melt are small and neglected

11 Material Material used in the simulation and experiments is a LLDPE resin with a melt index (MI) of 1 dg/min (190oC, 2.16 kg)

12 RESULTS & DISCUSSION

13 Pressure Profiles Spiral flute design enhances the conveying capability of the mixer Mixing undercut is the major flow restriction, and a larger undercut help increase the conveying capability Deeper flute channels only lead to slight increase in the conveying capability Mixer 1: straight flute Mixer 2: spiral flute Mixer 3: spiral flute, larger undercut Mixer 4: spiral flute, deeper flute

14 Temperature Profiles Temperature at discharge almost identical regardless the mixer design

15 Residence Time Distribution
Excessively deep flute channels lead to long residence time at the root of the trailing side of the flutes Mixer 1 (straight flute) Mixer 2 (spiral flute) Mixer 3 (spiral flute, larger undercut) Mixer 4 (spiral flute, deeper flute)

16 Mixing Quality Mixing quality was evaluated by using a passive scalar tracing method Assuming 50/50 black and white tracer at the entry with no mixing Entry Plane Discharge Plane Larger mixing flight undercut leads to reduced mixing performance 0.76 mm undercut 0.46 mm undercut

17 Mixing Quality PE requires a shear stress of 200+ kPa to ensure mitigation of entangled gels With a undercut of 1% of the barrel diameter, even at 70 rpm, the stress level is still below 200 kPa As a general guideline, a undercut of about 0.5% of barrel diameter is more appropriate for high-shear applications Smaller undercut will also mitigate solid polymer fragments in the extrudate

18 Summary Three major design factors of Maddock mixer were investigated using numerical simulation Larger mixing flight undercut enhances the conveying capability but leads to poor mixing quality Excessively deep flute channels lead to long residence time Spiral flute channel design improves the conveying capability

19 Recommendations Keep the flute depth at or slightly below half the flute width to avoid excessive residence time and resin degradation Use a spiral flute design when additional conveying capability is desired As a general guideline, mixing flight undercut around 0.5% of the barrel diameter is recommended for applications requiring high shear stress levels Need to be evaluated on a case-by-case basis depending on the specific resin type, machine size, and application

20 BACKUP SLIDES

21 Experimental Validation of Simulation Results
Simulated and experimental pressure data exhibit consistent trend

22 Experimental Validation of Simulation Results
Satisfactory agreement between simulation and experimental data

23 Mixing Flight Undercut
Undispersed gel content exhibits negative trend with shear stress Gel count v.s. shear stress experimental data generated using a shear refiner for a PS-elastomer blend A undercut of 1% of barrel diameter may not provide sufficient shear stress in many circumstances As a general guideline, satisfactory dispersive mixing can be usually achieved at an undercut around 0.5% of barrel diameter The optimal undercut size needs to determined with various other factors taken into consideration such as resin type, barrel size, and the applications


Download ppt "Xiaofei Sun, Mark A. Spalding"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google