1. Assessing GE under EO 1065, Instruments, Tools and Strategies.
CSU-ITL
2012 Summer Institute.
Assessing GE under EO 1065, Instruments, Tools and Strategies.
June 25, 2012

2. Logistics
Parking
Travel
Where to go tomorrow

3. Introductions Summer Institute Faculty Institute Guests
See your program for more details
Institute Guests
CO representatives
CSU Representatives
Chair of the Academic Senate of the CSU
Faculty Trustee (Board of Trustees of the CSU)

4. Bernadette Cheyne, Faculty Trustee

5. Who is at the Institute?

6. What do applicants expect to get done here?
Goals:
Skills, strategies:

7. Outcomes of the Summer Institute
Develop a core of faculty familiar with instruments such as ePortfolios, performance tasks, rubrics for other instruments in program level outcomes assessment
Implement program level GE assessment pilot projects across several CSU campuses as models for other campuses to adapt and adopt
Develop the expectation for an annual ITL event that enhances CSU faculty’s skills in teaching and ascertaining the level of student learning

8. What is used in the CSU for GE assessment?

9. Participant’s Perception of Campus GE Program Review
Initial: GE program review is a irregularly scheduled process with some faculty participation. It may review direct student learning data and/or indirect evidence. Program review recommendations are rarely implemented. Emerging: GE program review is a regularly scheduled process with faculty participation. It often review direct student learning data and/or indirect evidence. Program review recommendations may be implemented.
Developed: GE program review is a regularly scheduled process with faculty participation. It reviews indirect evidence and some direct student learning evidence. Program review recommendations are mostly implemented.
Highly developed: GE program review is a regularly scheduled process with significant faculty participation. It uses direct student learning data and indirect evidence to improve the program. Program review recommendations are implemented.

10. Who knows your GE outcomes (participants’ perceptions)?

11. That was the composite picture: all campuses’ results
That was the composite picture: all campuses’ results. Do the team members think alike?

12. Let’s look at dis-aggregated campus team responses.

13. Gail Evans, SFSU Keynote

14. Any questions?