1. COMPREHENSIVE SCHOOL SAFETY MONITORING TOOL
Orientation and Implementation
October 7-8, 2017

2. Agenda
Updating of List of DRRM Coordinators and Alternates, Contact Information
Capacity Building and Contingency Planning
DRRM IDs
DRRM Coordinator/Alternates Division Designation
Comprehensive School Safety Monitoring Tool Orientation and Implementation

3. COMPREHENSIVE SCHOOL SAFETY MONITORING TOOL
This school level Comprehensive School Safety Monitoring Tool is aligned with the Sendai Framework for DRR (SFDRR) and the global Comprehensive School Safety Framework (CSSF) developed by the UN International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UNISDR).

4. COMPREHENSIVE SCHOOL SAFETY MONITORING TOOL
Enabling Environment
Pillar 1: Safe Learning Facilities
Pillar 2: Disaster Risk Management
Pillar 3: Risk reduction and Resilience
Education

5. COMPREHENSIVE SCHOOL SAFETY MONITORING TOOL
As a signatory to the SFDRR, the Philippine Government is expected to report to the UNISDR its accomplishment in implementing the SFDRR. In line with this, the Department of Education is required to report its accomplishment in implementing Disaster Risk Reduction and Management (DRRM)/School Safety to the National DRRM Council (NDRRMC) as a member of the said council, and in accordance to RA (Philippine DRRM Act of 2010) which reflects the country's commitment to the SFDRR.

6. COMPREHENSIVE SCHOOL SAFETY MONITORING TOOL
This school level Comprehensive School Safety Monitoring Tool aims to:
Establish the baseline with respect to the implementation of the 3 pillars of DepEd's Comprehensive DRRM in Education Framework (DO 37, s 2015);
Set the school's DRRM targets for 3 years, based on the baseline;
Track the annual progress of the school with respect to its targets.

7. COMPREHENSIVE SCHOOL SAFETY MONITORING TOOL
This is primarily for the use of the School DRRM Team whose members are expected to facilitate the completion of this monitoring tool. The Head of the SDRRM Team shall submit the completed forms with the signature of he School Head to the Division DRRM Coordinator. The Division DRR Coordinator is expected to orient the SDRRM Team on how this tool is going to be filled-up, monitor the completion of schools and consolidate the results of all schools using the template also provided by the DRRMS Central Office. The consolidated results shall be submitted by the Division DRRM Coordinator to the DRRMS Central Office in ____________ of the current school year.

8. COMPREHENSIVE SCHOOL SAFETY MONITORING TOOL
First Column - Indicates the particular Priority for Action in the SFDRR that are related to the Targets of the global CSSF in the Second Column.
Third Column indicates DepEd's Comprehensive School Safety indicators at the school level that are related to columns 1 and 2. The school level DepEd indicators are based on the Department's Disaster Risk Reduction and Management (DRRM) policies and the School DRRM Manual (SDRRM).

9. COMPREHENSIVE SCHOOL SAFETY MONITORING TOOL
Fourth Column sets the baseline of the school with respect to DepEd's indicators in the 3rd column.
Supporting evidences, such as documents, should be provided by the School DRRM Team to the Division DRRM Coordinator.
Fourth Column sets the targets/plans of the school based on its baseline. The remaining columns will be accomplished by the school on an annual basis to indicate progress against the targets set for 3 years.

10. Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction
Hyogo Prefecture's second largest city by population and has been the center of the historical Harima Province for over a thousand years.
Hyogo prefecture is situated in the western part of Kinki Region (Midwest Japan) facing Seto Inland Sea in the south and the Sea of Japan in the north
Sendai is the capital city of Miyagi Prefecture, Japan, the largest city in the Tōhoku region, and the second largest city north of Tokyo

11. Sendai Framework
a 15-year ( ), voluntary, non-binding agreement which recognizes that the State has the primary role to reduce disaster risk but that responsibility should be shared with other stakeholders including local government, the private sector and other stakeholders.

12. Sendai Framework Outcome:
The substantial reduction of disaster risk and losses in lives, livelihoods and health and in the economic, physical, social, cultural and environmental assets of persons, businesses, communities and countries. Framework.

13. Sendai Framework
the successor instrument to the Hyogo Framework for Action (HFA) : Building the Resilience of Nations and Communities to Disasters.

14. Sendai Framework
It is the outcome of stakeholder consultations initiated in March 2012 and inter-governmental negotiations held from July 2014 to March 2015, which were supported by the UNISDR upon the request of the UN General Assembly.
UNISDR has been tasked to support the implementation, follow-up and review of the Sendai Framework.

15. Sendai Framework
UNISDR has been tasked to support the implementation, follow-up and review of the Sendai Framework.

16. The Seven Global Targets
Substantially reduce global disaster mortality by 2030, aiming to lower average per 100,000 global mortality rate in the decade compared to the period  
Substantially reduce the number of affected people globally by 2030, aiming to lower average global figure per 100,000 in the decade compared to the period  to the people by 2030.

17. The Seven Global Targets
Reduce direct disaster economic loss in relation to global gross domestic product (GDP) by 2030. 
Substantially reduce disaster damage to critical infrastructure and disruption of basic services, among them health and educational facilities, including through developing their resilience by 2030. 
Substantially increase the number of countries with national and local disaster risk reduction strategies by 2020. 

18. The Seven Global Targets
Substantially enhance international cooperation to developing countries through adequate and sustainable support to complement their national actions for implementation of this Framework by 2030. 
Substantially increase the availability of and access to multi-hazard early warning systems and disaster risk information and assessments to the people by 2030.

19. The Four Priorities for Action
Priority 1. Understanding disaster risk
Disaster risk management should be based on an understanding of disaster risk in all its dimensions of vulnerability, capacity, exposure of persons and assets, hazard characteristics and the environment. Such knowledge can be used for risk assessment, prevention, mitigation, preparedness and response.
Priority 2. Strengthening disaster risk governance to manage disaster risk
Disaster risk governance at the national, regional and global levels is very important for prevention, mitigation, preparedness, response, recovery, and rehabilitation. It fosters collaboration and partnership.

20. The Four Priorities for Action
Priority 3. Investing in disaster risk reduction for resilience
Public and private investment in disaster risk prevention and reduction through structural and non-structural measures are essential to enhance the economic, social, health and cultural resilience of persons, communities, countries and their assets, as well as the environment.

21. The Four Priorities for Action
Priority 4. Enhancing disaster preparedness for effective response and to “Build Back Better” in recovery, rehabilitation and reconstruction
The growth of disaster risk means there is a need to strengthen disaster preparedness for response, take action in anticipation of events, and ensure capacities are in place for effective response and recovery at all levels. The recovery, rehabilitation and reconstruction phase is a critical opportunity to build back better, including through integrating disaster risk reduction into development measures.