Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Indicators for sustainable plant protection in Belgium

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Indicators for sustainable plant protection in Belgium"— Presentation transcript:

1 Indicators for sustainable plant protection in Belgium
Programme de Réduction des Pesticides et des Biocides Programma voor de Reductie van Pesticiden en Biociden Program for Reduction of Pesticides and Biocides

2 Indicators for sustainable plant protection in Belgium
Characterization of the Issue by a DPSIR approach Selection of Indicators Importance of the Regulation on Pesticide Statistics A DPSIR B Indicators C Regulation

3 A. Pesticides in Belgium
Driving forces D Pressure P S State Impact I R Response Impact Human health damages Professional diseases Environmental disorders Driving forces Agricultural production Food consumption Safety, recreation Pressure Plant Protection Product (PPP) use State Residues in food/feed Residues in people Residues in environment Response IPM Implementation Biodiversity support Enforcement of legislation Registration of PPP Support to alternatives Waste management A DPSIR B Indicators C Regulation

4 B. Selection of indicators
P S I R B. Selection of indicators Indicators are to be selected for each DPSIR component on the following criteria : Representative Meaningful Measurable All indicators should provide a dash board which must be: Efficient for the national action plan Understandable for public and politics Minimum cost/quality ratio A DPSIR B Indicators C Regulation

5 D P S I R The indicators of the driving forces are derived from general production and consumption patterns Driving forces Indicators Units Agricultural production Quantity of production Potato t/year Cereals Sugar beet Food consumption Quantity of consumption Sugar Safety, recreation A DPSIR B Indicators C Regulation

6 Indicators for pressure are based on sale and uses statistics
Units PPP use by : Quantities[1] Total t as/year professionals Insecticides non-professionals Herbicides Fungicides Specific[2] Frequency[3] ha-dose/year Glasshouses ha-dose/ha Potato Specific [2] Group of a.s. for a specific issue (e.g. systemic insecticides, persistent substances) [1] In a first time, indicators will be calculated from sale data. Later, when available, indicators will be based on use data. [3] The added value of such an indicator at the national level is still in discussion. A DPSIR B Indicators C Regulation

7 State indicators are generally issued from monitoring
P S I R State indicators are generally issued from monitoring State Indicators Units Residues in food/feed Quantity for a standard diet Controlled a.s. mg/day Residues in people Quantity in umbilical cord blood ng/g plasma lipid Residues in the environment Contamination of rivers Contamination levels still to define Contamination of catchments A DPSIR B Indicators C Regulation

8 Indicators for Impact are mainly risk indicators
DPSIR components Indicators Units Health damages Food consumers P R I B E L One exp/tox model by component. PRIBEL is intended to be continuously updated to the best available models (Footprint, Synops, etc.) times of threshold value for tox Professional diseases Applicators Environmental Birds disorders Bees Water organisms Ground water Earthworms Poisoning incidents Damage levels times/year A DPSIR B Indicators C Regulation

9 Response indicators give an overview of the success of the measures
[1] General Guidelines; Specific Guidelines Response Indicators Units IPM implementation Compliance to IPM Guidelines GG[1] compliance % of UAA[2] SG[1] compliance Biodiversity support Ecological Infrastructure (EI) ∑ EI area Enforcement of legislation Pesticides applications Amount of infractions % of controls Application machinery Pesticide storage [2] Utilizable Agricultural Area A DPSIR B Indicators C Regulation

10 D P S I R Response indicators give an overview of the success of the measures (continued) Response Indicators Units Registration of PPP Solving of critical gaps in PPP availability Critical gaps in registration % solved Support to alternatives Biopesticides support Number of biopesticides Number of registered PPP Research support Financial support k €/ha UAA Organic Farming support Area in OF % of UAA Waste management Recovery of PPP packages Recovery efficiency % of sold packaging A DPSIR B Indicators C Regulation

11 D P S I R C. The contribution of the pesticide statistics Regulation in the dash board is potentially high Components Descriptors Indicators Units Pressure PPP use Quantities Five groups t as/year (two groups) Frequency Four groups ha-dose/year Impact Prof. diseases Applicators Seven risk indicators Time of tox Envi. disorders Birds, bees, etc. Response Waste management Recovery of PPP packages Recovery efficiency % of sold packaging 26 indicators on 46 are dependent of pesticide stats A DPSIR B Indicators C Regulation

12 Conclusion & Remark DPSIR method for the pesticide situation for Belgium. Dash board of about 50 indicators (not only risk indicators). The pesticide Regulation on statistic use and sale is of the utmost importance for the risk management. Biocides : comparable issue ! => the same stats than for PPP are required !

13 More information Dr Ir V. Van Bol Coordinator of the Programme for Reduction of Pesticides and Biocides FPS Health, Food chain safety and Environment Place Victor Horta 40 box 10 B BRUSSELS tel. 32 (0) fax 32 (0)


Download ppt "Indicators for sustainable plant protection in Belgium"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google