1. Kathryn Woods

2. Good start, remember to open up other websites beside Dida and see how they did it. You covered all the research ground very well

3. Youve forgotten to add contingency time! Good, I really like the design. Once youve fixed up all the errors such as not enough sub-tasks and lack of contingency time, It will be perfect.

4. Very skilled database, you imported your data perfectly You forgot to add the OR in your validation rules, thats why it isnt working. (other than that, good) This is great!

5. Your data sheets need a nice design, but nothing too bright. Make sure their size is okay for PDF format. Dont worry about the colours, keep them pastel/neutral.

6. I really like the design! Its exciting and will look really good on actual paper! Your membership card has a really good layout x Make sure you add only relevant information

7. This keeps to the consistency of your publications (like your membership card), so its good. The page below the WildCare symbol is a bit boring, but your adoption fomr is well-thought out.

8. I know you need to keep to the consistency of your other publications, but the light blue background throws everything off. Maybe you could strip it down in your next draft??

9. Really nice, but you need to add more info on the endangered animals on our reports then the people viewing it will be interested in WildCare enough to make an adoption.

10. Your review is really well written, with accurate print screens of everything. You focus on everything equally, just remember to write your conclusion.

11. Good structure and well-laid out! Your idea of adding a gif is really good, itll make the website seem a lot more professional You need to make a header, but other than that its very professional-looking.