Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

ACT Project Methodologies for assessment of coordinated care and telehealth - IFIC 2014 Cristina Bescos, Helen Schonenberg 9/22/2018 ACT Programme.

Published byJulia Groen Modified over 5 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "ACT Project Methodologies for assessment of coordinated care and telehealth - IFIC 2014 Cristina Bescos, Helen Schonenberg 9/22/2018 ACT Programme."— Presentation transcript:

1 ACT Project Methodologies for assessment of coordinated care and telehealth - IFIC 2014 Cristina Bescos, Helen Schonenberg 9/22/2018 ACT Programme

2 Description “Identify ‘best practice’ organisational and structural processes supporting integration and implementation of telehealth in a care coordination context for routine management of chronic patients” The ACT program is an assessment and evaluation project for Care Coordination & Telehealth Deployment Collect and share best practices between members 9/22/2018 ACT Programme

3 Maturity Map Phase 1: Planning of change
This phase covers landscaping of the situation, knowledge acquisition, business case analysis and planning and preparation activities to the level of definition of technical and functional requirements, service specifications, selection of providers and users, setting the procurement system and staff/user capability planning. Phase 1: Planning of change The second phase includes an initial introduction of changes in a geographical/organisational environment (one or several projects) for a limited duration pursuing a detailed review of the intervention and impact before decision to large scale long-term commitment. This phase includes refinements of the outcomes of the planning phase based on the experience accumulated. The new models/services could still be stopped without major impact to the rest of the social and HC organization. Phase 2: Adaptation phase Point of non-return reached. This phase covers a full deployment of new services under a sustainable infrastructure and organization. Services are adequately monitored and evaluated. The services are running, performing with certain stability. Phase 3: Full scale implementation phase The performance of the healthcare system is reviewed and some further changes are introduced to improve efficiency and efficacy or enlarge the scope/coverage of integrated care. Refinements of services and new solutions are incorporated in a non-disruptive manner. Phase 4: Continuous improvement after deployment

4 Phasing Maturity map (Outcome Barcelona & Brussels workshop)
Projects Healthcare services Healthcare & social services Phasing Maturity map (Outcome Barcelona & Brussels workshop) Northern Netherlands Catalonia Basque Country Lombardy Scotland Continuous improvement after deployment Full scale implementation phase Planning of change Early adoption BC NN Lo Sc Ca Sc Organisational model Workforce development Development of population stratification tools Integrated care pathways User involvement/Patient engagement Support of technology for the new care model Lo Lo Sc Lo Sc Lo Sc Lo Sc Sc Lo

5 Methodology Based on literature, clinical & regional experts,
Definition, collection, monitoring & analysis of Key Performance Indicators that measure CC&TH deployment success Drivers indicators that influence Key Performance Indicators ACT Evaluation engine Systematic automated way to collect, store and aggregate data Provides interactive access for regions and clinical experts Analysis results Benchmarking within or across regions 9/22/2018 ACT Programme

6 Evaluation Frameworks
INAHTA EUnetHTA MAST NTOIP Description International network of agencies for health technology assessment Consortium of 57 non-profit organizations European network for health technology assessment (HTA) Includes 64 HTA Organizations Model for assessment of Telemedicine applications MethoTelemed study National Telehealth outcome indicators project Application Whether or not to fund a Telemedicine application Should we replace an existing healthcare application by Telemedicine? Assessment of medical and surgical interventions ad diagnostic technologies Decide whether or not to use new Telemedicine applications Choose the most appropriate technology to be used Identification and definition of a small number of simple and meaningful outcomes for consistent application in Telehealth evaluation Goal Assess Telehealth technology Explore deployment of Telemedicine Development of a framework for the assessment of Telemedicine applications Develop/ promote good practice in HTA methods and processes Facilitate local adaptation of HTA information Help reduce unnecessary duplication of HTA activities Publish book with guidelines Provide framework for assessing Telemedicine applications Model for new studies Checklist for inclusion of domains and outcomes in new studies Model for assessment based on literature reviews Move focus from easy input measures and process outcomes to more complex challenges Clarify hierarchical relationships between outcome indicator elements ACT Application Evaluate care coordination and Telehealth deployment Goal Identify CC&TH best practices Publish best practices Facilitate deployment of best practices 9/22/2018 ACT Programme

7 Evaluation Frameworks
INAHTA EUnetHTA MAST NTOIP Framework General considerations: technical assessment, effectiveness, study design, quality of life measures, other outcomes Costs: direct, indirect, intangible Economic evaluation Sensitivity evaluation 9 domains: health problem, description of technical characteristics, safety, effectiveness, cost and economic evaluation, ethical, organizational, social and legal. Describes purpose, relevant alternatives, scope of assessment and application maturity 7 domains: health problem & characteristics of the application, safety, clinical effectiveness, patient perspectives, economic, organizational, socio cultural, ethical and legal aspects Describes transferability of results 5 domains, outcome Category: health status, non-medical determinants, health system performance, community and health system characteristics Theme: quality, accessibility, acceptability, cost Indicator: the variable to assess Measure: the visible effect of a TH related intervention Tool: instruments to collect data for any single outcome measure Notes Suitable for development, initial assessment and long term assessment Only suitable for mature applications. Outcomes focused, processes are not included ACT Framework Per CC&TH area: (1) stratification, (2) care coordination & workflow management, (3) patient adherence & staff engagement, (4) efficiency & efficacy outcomes Domains based on INATHA, EUnetHTA, MAST, NTOIP and expertice from clinical experts and regions Notes Process and outcomes oriented framework Different maturity levels of CC&TH implementations 9/22/2018 ACT Programme

8 Evidence Drivers Outcomes Population Stratification
Method Diseases Age Deprivation Index Past use of HC resources Patient Stratification Health status Frailty Capabilities Care Coordination and WF management Coordination of care Org. structure & function Technology Care Pathways Patient Adherence Introduction Belief Experience with TH technology Staff Engagement Leadership Awareness Motivation Workforce development Creating psychological ownership Organizational change Efficiency & Efficacy Case ascertainment Health outcomes Clinical management goals Process outcomes Service utilization Economic outcomes Patient Adherence Adherence Satisfaction Acceptance Benefits 9/22/2018 ACT Programme

9 Challenges CC&TH implementation is not led by us,
Variations: implementation, maturity level, evaluation goals Lack of data collection standards / methods Variations in interpretation reported values, Variations in reporting level (regional, program, org. unit) Access to population-level data only Limits analysis possibilities Due to: lack of direct access, trust, or high effort Attitude is changing Acceptance of results in clinical domain (no RCT) 9/22/2018 ACT Programme

Download ppt "ACT Project Methodologies for assessment of coordinated care and telehealth - IFIC 2014 Cristina Bescos, Helen Schonenberg 9/22/2018 ACT Programme."

Similar presentations

Intelligence Step 5 - Capacity Analysis Capacity Analysis Without capacity, the most innovative and brilliant interventions will not be implemented, wont.

Intelligence Step 5 - Capacity Analysis Capacity Analysis Without capacity, the most innovative and brilliant interventions will not be implemented, wont.
Supporting National e-Health Roadmaps WHO-ITU-WB joint effort WSIS C7 e-Health Facilitation Meeting 13 th May 2010 Hani Eskandar ICT Applications, ITU.

Supporting National e-Health Roadmaps WHO-ITU-WB joint effort WSIS C7 e-Health Facilitation Meeting 13 th May 2010 Hani Eskandar ICT Applications, ITU.
CULTURAL COMPETENCY Technical Assistance Pre-Application Workshop.

CULTURAL COMPETENCY Technical Assistance Pre-Application Workshop.
Barbara M. Altman Emmanuelle Cambois Jean-Marie Robine Extended Questions Sets: Purpose, Characteristics and Topic Areas Fifth Washington group meeting.

Barbara M. Altman Emmanuelle Cambois Jean-Marie Robine Extended Questions Sets: Purpose, Characteristics and Topic Areas Fifth Washington group meeting.
Chapter I Introduction: The Nature of Leadership Matakuliah: A0092 - Kepemimpinan Tahun: 2008 / 2009.

Chapter I Introduction: The Nature of Leadership Matakuliah: A Kepemimpinan Tahun: 2008 / 2009.
Enhancing Data Quality of Distributive Trade Statistics Workshop for African countries on the Implementation of International Recommendations for Distributive.

Enhancing Data Quality of Distributive Trade Statistics Workshop for African countries on the Implementation of International Recommendations for Distributive.
CW/MH Learning Collaborative First Statewide Leadership Convening Lessons Learned from the Readiness Assessment Tools Lisa Conradi, PsyD Project Co-Investigator.

CW/MH Learning Collaborative First Statewide Leadership Convening Lessons Learned from the Readiness Assessment Tools Lisa Conradi, PsyD Project Co-Investigator.
Policy recommendations for wider implementation of telemedicine Peeter Ross, MD, PhD e-Health expert, Estonian eHealth Foundation, Estonia.

Policy recommendations for wider implementation of telemedicine Peeter Ross, MD, PhD e-Health expert, Estonian eHealth Foundation, Estonia.
Dr Dominique Allwood Public Health Registrar

Dr Dominique Allwood Public Health Registrar
Research problem, Purpose, question

Research problem, Purpose, question
Lecture IntentLecture Intent  Position my scholarship within ideas and streams introduced in seminar to this point  Provide initial introduction to.

Lecture IntentLecture Intent  Position my scholarship within ideas and streams introduced in seminar to this point  Provide initial introduction to.
From Evidence to Action: Addressing Challenges to Knowledge Translation in RHAs The Need to Know Team Meeting May 30, 2005.

From Evidence to Action: Addressing Challenges to Knowledge Translation in RHAs The Need to Know Team Meeting May 30, 2005.
MAST: the organisational aspects Lise Kvistgaard Odense University Hospital Denmark Berlin, May 2010.

MAST: the organisational aspects Lise Kvistgaard Odense University Hospital Denmark Berlin, May 2010.
SESIH Redesign Update Older Persons and Chronic Care Project Paul Preobrajensky Manager Redesign Program 19 September 2007.

SESIH Redesign Update Older Persons and Chronic Care Project Paul Preobrajensky Manager Redesign Program 19 September 2007.
Sina Keshavaarz M.D Public Health &Preventive Medicine Measuring level of performance & sustaining improvement.

Sina Keshavaarz M.D Public Health &Preventive Medicine Measuring level of performance & sustaining improvement.
Common framework Guidelines for Pilot Actions Debrecen 2013 Municipality of Debrecen Department of Sociology University of Debrecen External expert.

Common framework Guidelines for Pilot Actions Debrecen 2013 Municipality of Debrecen Department of Sociology University of Debrecen External expert.
Introduction to MAST Kristian Kidholm Odense University Hospital, Denmark.

Introduction to MAST Kristian Kidholm Odense University Hospital, Denmark.
Workshop The science and methodologies behind HTA, diversity and commonality across the EU Achieving more patient centred HTA in different countries.

Workshop The science and methodologies behind HTA, diversity and commonality across the EU Achieving more patient centred HTA in different countries.
Potential Roles for Health Technology Assessment Agencies: Opportunities and Challenges for an Effective Health Technology Assessment Practice at the Meso.

Potential Roles for Health Technology Assessment Agencies: Opportunities and Challenges for an Effective Health Technology Assessment Practice at the Meso.
Transforming Community Services Commissioning Information for Community Services Stakeholder Workshop 14 October 2009 Coleen Milligan – Project Manager.

Transforming Community Services Commissioning Information for Community Services Stakeholder Workshop 14 October 2009 Coleen Milligan – Project Manager.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google