Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Procedure compared to that of conventional repair systems

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Procedure compared to that of conventional repair systems"— Presentation transcript:

1 Procedure compared to that of conventional repair systems
old style silan acid etch bonding preparation with diamond bur fractured ceramic composite Repair primer Repair Bond Repair system November 06 GDF Private Label Chemistry

2 GDF Private Label Chemistry
Competitors systems Vita / Ultradent (Group I) 1) hydrofluoric acid etching 2) bonding agent (silane) 3) opaquer 4) composite Ivoclar / Kulzer / VOCO (Group II) 1) phosphoric acid etching 2) bonding agent (silane) 3) opaquer 4) composite 3M Espe / Kuraray 1) CoJet sand / phosphoric acid etching 2) bonding agent (silane) 3) opaquer 4) light-curing bonder 5) composite November 06 GDF Private Label Chemistry

3 GDF Private Label Chemistry
Competitors systems November 06 GDF Private Label Chemistry

4 Advantages of the Repair system
Optimized for intraoral use - no acid etching - no silane as bonding agent Minimal expenditure of time Possibility to monitor Universal and versatile - Optimized for all conventional ceramics - All conventional curing lights can be used - Most composites are compatible with the system Extremely high bonding strength - because of perfectly attuned components November 06 GDF Private Label Chemistry


Download ppt "Procedure compared to that of conventional repair systems"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google