Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Forests, Trees and Agroforestry

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Forests, Trees and Agroforestry"— Presentation transcript:

1 Forests, Trees and Agroforestry
CIFOR Annual Meeting 2016 Bogor

2 FTA original proposal 2011-2020

3 Forests,Trees and Agroforestry
PHASE1:

4 Consultative development process
6April: CRP6 Approved by Fund Council 7February:Full draft proposal re- Submitted to Consortium Board 25 January:18 partners provide comments 19 January 2011:Revised draft sent to 100+partners 24 December: Consortium Board+4 independent reviewers provide comment on full draft 6 September: Full draft submitted to Consortium Board 27 August: 34 partners provide comments 14 July: Full draft proposal sent to 171partners 5J uly: 73 respondents agree to provide comment on full draft proposal 27 May2 010:20 page concept note sent to 328partners

5 Conceptual framework: tree cover transition

6 FTA extension

7 Extension proposal

8 Portfolio, program structure
5 Flagships 4 Cross-cutting themes 1Management Committee with greater responsibilities 1 Independent Steering Committee Role of CIFOR BOT as Lead Center reinforced

9 Achievements

10 FTAprojectsin2015bylocation
Outputs 2012 2013 2014 2015 Achieved 77.6% 79.5% 73.4% 77.9% On-going 21.0% 19.9% 22.5% 17.0% Dropped 1.4% 0.6% 4.2% 5.1% Outputs, Projects FTAprojectsin2015bylocation

11 Publications(2012-2015) Type 2012 2013 2014 2015 4yr Article ISI 209
208 299 215 931 Article Non ISI 58 92 68 113 331 Book 40 25 50 36 151 Chapter 103 135 95 436 Paper 84 82 369 Brief 66 134 56 348 Conference Paper 30 27 23 49 129 Others 65 125 63 335 Total 656 779 886 709 3,030 Type of Publication No of Titles Open Access % Articles ISI 931 392 42% Articles Non-ISI 330 190 58% Books 137 97 71% Briefs 228 224 98% Brochure & Flyers 51 100% Chapters 434 271 62% Factsheet 120 Guideline 16 Paper 368 333 90% Poster 47 27 57% Proceeding 128 37 29% Report 71 50 70% Strategy Documents 19 18 95% Thesis 30 8 27% Tools 20 TOTAL 2,930 1,854 63% FTA publications have been downloaded more than 1,500,000 time over 4years.

12 Open Data Platforms

13 Partnerships Levels / Types Research Policy and Practice
Knowledge-sharing International CIRAD, IRD, IUFRO, other ARIs and universities CPF, FAO, UNEP, World Bank, UN-REDD, IPCC, FSC, IUCN BBC World Service Trust, Panos, IUCN, AFP, Reuters, Google Regional CATIE, ANAFE, FARA, SEANAFE, ASARECA, CORAF, SAARD, SA-AP-LA-FORGEN AFF, COMIFAC, ECOWAS, COMESA, ASEAN RECOFTC, STCP, CATIE Country or local NARS, local/national research organizations, FORDA, KEFRI Government, CBOs, NGOs, private sector Local NGOs and networks, government CRPs Location FTA/CCAFS Global FTA/CCAFS/WLE/Drylands(+dev.partners) Burkina Faso FTA/A4NH(/AAS) Various sites & global FTA/PIM/WLE FTA/Drylands/Humidtropics Various sites FTA/Humidtropics/L&F/CCAFS Nicaragua

14 CapacityDevelopment Figuresfor2012-2015
Indicator 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total participants MS and PhD male students 32 109 112 136 389 MS and PhD female students 28 74 124 59 285 Male trainees in short-term programs facilitated by FTA 1,440 ≈1,500 4,252 35,800 ≈43000 Female trainees in short-term programs facilitated by FTA 1,560 2,540 14,000 ≈19600 Figuresfor More than 60,000 trainees over the 4years Efforts to track results beyond numbers

15 Gender The Gender Integration Team, 6 members (5full-time), supports the process and substance of gender integration at the different partners. 100+ published outputs, including 20 tools and guidelines and the 2016 Earthscan edited volume on gender and forests; more than 90 communication products(blogs, newsletters, posters etc.); events at Asia Pacific Forestry Congress, World Forestry Congress, COP 20/21, GLF and IUFRO; more than 180 scientists and partners trained Strategic partnerships with gender focal points and Women’s ministries, UN agencies, international NGOs, advocacy organizations and academia for enhanced up take of FTA gender research findings FTA gender research informing governmental and non-governmental decisions in e.g. Peru, Indonesia, Vietnam and Nepal, and major global assessments such as UNEP’s Global Gender and Environment Outlook, Global Sustainable Development Report and IUFRO Global Expert Panel Review on Forests and Food Security Gender Equality in Research Scale (GEIRS): a monitoring and learning tool for gender integration in the FTA research project portfolio

16 Outcomes,impacts About 1,200,000 ha of avoided deforestation and 1,000,000 ha of avoided degradation Research provided a necessary contribution to more than 20 million ha of better managed forest in Africa and Latin America Change in the legal definition of agroforestry in Peru (2M people;4.5M ha of the Peruvian Amazon) Trees on farm increase food crop yield(15-30%)and income(200$/year)in the Sahel Terra-I supply of Global Forest Watch with regionally verified data

17 Improved management processes
FTA project portfolio data harmonization Standard information fields Centralized location (FTA sharepoint) Informing CIFOR PMS enhancement Addresses a major technical bottleneck to active portfolio management Equipping projects with tools, capacity, training Good practice design principles Theory of change M&E tools including Evidence capture (outcomes, adoption) Ex-ante, ex-post impact assessments

18 Pre-proposal phase2, The[FTA] pre-proposal is well written, compelling and shows clear evidence of improvement on Phase I/…/ The research program appears a more coherent whole. ISPC assessment pre-proposals

19 FTA2 full proposal

20 The futures we want?

21 FTA contribution to SRF targets
Financial resources needed 2017–2022 (USD in millions) SLO1: Reduced poverty 144 100 million more farm households have adopted improved varieties, breeds or trees, and/or improved management practices 31 million more farm/smallholder households have adopted improved varieties, breeds or trees, and/or improved management practices 75 30 million people, of which 50% are women, helped to exit poverty 19 million people, 50% women, assisted to exit poverty 69 SLO2: Improved food and nutrition security for health 124 Improve the rate of yield increase for major food staples from current <1% to 1.2–1.5% year-1 Improve the rate of yield increase by %/year in FT&A systems 16 30 million more people, of which 50% are women, meeting minimum dietary energy requirements 17 million people, 50% women, meeting minimum dietary requirements or experience increased dietary diversity 108 150 million more people, of which 50% are women, without deficiencies of one or more of the following essential micronutrients: iron, zinc, iodine, vitamin A, folate and vitamin B12 N/A (although linked to above nutritional, poverty reduction and increased productivity targets) - 10% reduction in women of reproductive age who are consuming less than the adequate number of food groups SLO3: Improved natural resource systems and ecosystem services 161 5% increase in water and nutrient (inorganic, biological) use efficiency in agroecosystems, including through recycling and reuse 0.225% increase in either water or nutrient use efficiency is achieved 14 Reduce agricultural-related greenhouse gas emissions by 0.2 Gt CO2-e yr–1 (5%) compared with business-as-usual scenario in 2022 FT&A GHG emissions reduced by 0.2 Gt CO2-e yr-1 compared with the business-as-usual scenario 78 55 million ha degraded land area restored 30 million ha of degraded land area under restoration 39 2.5 million ha of forest saved from deforestation 2.5 million ha of avoided deforestation 30

22 Forest/Tree cover transition

23 Hypotheses FTA II is built around 3 overarching hypotheses:
Governance hypothesis: Public and private governance and institutional arrangements must be transformed and aligned to create the necessary enabling environment allowing FT&A systems to fully contribute to achieving the SDGs. Livelihood hypothesis: There is scope for major increases in income, food and nutrition security and resilience for at least 100 million people in the face of climate change, through more inclusive and gender equitable access to and better utilization and management o fFT&A systems. Trade-offs hypothesis: To optimize benefits among diverse stakeholders at scales from the farm to the globe requires understanding and actively managing trade offs among the production of food, fiber, energy, water, other ecosystem services and the maintenance of biodiversity from forests and trees in landscapes.

24 Theory of change

25 Portfolio, program structure
5 Flagships 5 Cross-cutting themes (MELIA, CapDev, Data, Gender/Youth, KM) 1 Management Committee 1 Independent Steering Committee Role of CIFOR BOT as Lead Center reinforced

26 Partnerships Type Involvement FTA CRPs, research, private sector
Partnersinpractitionerrealmforupandoutscaling FTA'scontributingpartners FTA'smanagingpartners Scale of Impact through outreach Type Involvement FTA Managing partners Discovery, proof of concept, scaling CIFOR, ICRAF, Bioversity, CIRAD, CATIE, TBI, INBAR Contributing partners CRPs, research, private sector Discovery, proof of concept WLE, PIM, CCAFS… ARIs, Universities (North & South), Corporate,Produce rassociations Scaling partners Policy, regulators, private sector Piloting, scaling up/out Government agencies, Networks, IGO, Regional Org, MDB, MEA…

27 Governance ISCmembers: Anne-Marie Izac(Chair;ind.) Joyeeta Gupta(ind.)
Board of Trustees, Lead Center Independent Steering Committee Director General, Lead Center Management Team Managing Partners FP1 leader FP2 leader FP3 leader FP4 leader FP5 leader Management Support Unit Program Manager FTA director programmatic administrative Governance ISCmembers: Anne-Marie Izac(Chair;ind.) Joyeeta Gupta(ind.) Florencia Montagnini(ind.) Yemi Katerere(ind.) Ravi Prabhu(CGIAR) Alain Billand(noCGIAR) Peter Holmgren(leadCenter) Vincent Gitz FTA Director(ex-officio non-voting)

28 Budget and financing plan
FTA6-year Budget Proposed Budget($m) W3+Bilateral($m) Funding gap % of totalbudget Flagship W1+W2 W3+Bilateral Total Secured* FundingGap FP1-Tree Genetic Resources for production and resilience 12.6 65.3 77.8 19.3 45.9 10% FP2-Enhancing trees and forest contribution to smallholder livelihoods 96.2 108.8 17.6 78.7 16% FP3-Sustainable global value chains and investments 70.4 83.0 6.9 63.5 13% FP4-Landscape Dynamics, productivity and resilience 103.0 115.6 22.8 80.2 17% FP5-Climate change mitigation / adaptation opportunities in forests & agroforestry 73.8 86.4 9.2 64.6 M&S cost 11.0 73.9 408.8 482.6 75.8 332.9 69% FTA-2017 ProposedBudget($m) Funding gap % of total budget 1.8 9.8 11.7 7.8 2.0 3% 14.9 16.7 11.4 3.5 5% 10.5 12.4 3.6 16.0 17.9 12.5 12.9 2% M&S Cost 62.2 73.2 47.9 14.4 20%

29 Timeline–submissions, revisions
Fullproposalv1-31/03/2016;CommentsISPCandCO-16/06/2016 Fullproposalv2-31/07/2016;FinalassessmentISPC-15/06/2016

30 Assessment by the Funding Effectiveness Working Group (FEWG)

31 What’s next? 24-26/09 System Council to discuss proposals, W1-2 funding, and provide final guidance to Centers on must-haves 30/09 Final ISPC report on full proposals (adjusted after SC meeting 03-05/10 FTA management team meet in CIFOR 01/11 Starting date incoming FTA Director (V. Gitz) 01-22/11 Center revisions of CGIAR System Council must haves 23/11 – 05/12 ISPC review of CRP2 proposals following Centers’ further revision 13/12 System Council virtual meeting to approve the CRP2 portfolio By 31/12 New CRP legal agreements put in place between CGIAR System Council and lead Centers

32 Some light thoughts to finish
Ig Nobel, Peace Prize — Gordon Pennycook et al. for their scholarly study called "On the Reception and Detection of Pseudo-Profound Bullshit". (Judgment and Decision Making, Vol. 10, No. 6, November 2015, pp. 549–563). THANKS TO THE FTA TEAM! to keep me on my toes and away from being pseudo-profound

33


Download ppt "Forests, Trees and Agroforestry"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google