Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Bureaucracy (cont’d) September 19th, 2006 (Negative?) Attributes of Bureaucracy rigid red-tape (inefficient) stifles creativity top-down not responsive.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Bureaucracy (cont’d) September 19th, 2006 (Negative?) Attributes of Bureaucracy rigid red-tape (inefficient) stifles creativity top-down not responsive."— Presentation transcript:

1

2

3 Bureaucracy (cont’d) September 19th, 2006

4 (Negative?) Attributes of Bureaucracy
rigid red-tape (inefficient) stifles creativity top-down not responsive not participatory anonymous nameless, faceless not representative not elected

5 (Positive?) Attributes of Bureaucracy
effective especially at mass routine tasks in comparison to other forms of organization accountable person at the top of the hierarchy is nominally responsible for anything done lower down in the organizational chain possible to find out where mistakes were made and who made them (internally) impartial (as opposed to arbitrary)

6

7

8 (Positive?) Attributes of Bureaucracy
effective especially at mass routine tasks in comparison to other forms of organization accountable person at the top of the hierarchy is nominally responsible for anything done lower down in the organizational chain possible to find out where mistakes were made and who made them (internally) impartial (as opposed to arbitrary)

9 Democracy September 19th, 2006

10 Democracy -- What is It?? Process or Outcome?? BOTH!

11 Opportunities for Mass Participation
Democracy -- A Process Opportunities for Mass Participation LOW HIGH Representative (Trustee) Democracy Representative (Delegate) Democracy Participatory Democracy Direct Democracy

12 Democracy -- The Outcomes
Protection of Individual Rights Low High Emphasis on General Welfare Emphasis on Limited Government

13 Models of Democracy Individual Rights/Limited Gov’t
Liberal Democracy I High Mass Participation Low Mass Participation Majoritarian Democracy Elite Democracy General Welfare

14 Models of Democracy within a range of models incorporating some minimum amount of meaningful citizen input and some minimum protection of basic rights, there are different models of democracy choice of models is completely normative there is no “right” model the best model of democracy is contestable

15 Models of Democracy Individual Rights/Limited Gov’t
Liberal Democracy I High Mass Participation Low Mass Participation Majoritarian Democracy Elite Democracy General Welfare

16 Models of Democracy Individual Rights/Limited Gov’t
Liberal Democracy I High Mass Participation Low Mass Participation Majoritarian Democracy Elite Democracy General Welfare

17 Models of Democracy majoritarian democracy
most important goal is maximizing mass participation high mass participation will result in decisions being made that maximize the general welfare

18 Models of Democracy Individual Rights/Limited Gov’t
Liberal Democracy I High Mass Participation Low Mass Participation Majoritarian Democracy Elite Democracy General Welfare

19 Models of Democracy elite democracy
most important goal is the general welfare requires an elite capable of pursuing the long-term interests of society actually values low mass participation

20 Models of Democracy Individual Rights/Limited Gov’t Liberal Democracy
High Mass Participation Low Mass Participation Marjoritarian Democracy Elite Democracy General Welfare

21 Models of Democracy liberal democracy
most important goal is protecting individual rights does not prefer low mass participation but may be willing to accept it

22 Models of Democracy majoritarian democracy
most important goal is maximizing mass participation high mass participation will result in decisions being made that maximize the general welfare majoritarian democratic critiques of other models

23 Models of Democracy majoritarian democracy
most important goal is maximizing mass participation high mass participation will result in decisions being made that maximize the general welfare majoritarian democratic critiques of other models elite democracy – there is no such thing as an elite that is not self-interested and will look after the good of the general masses

24

25

26 Models of Democracy majoritarian democracy
most important goal is maximizing mass participation high mass participation will result in decisions being made that maximize the general welfare majoritarian democratic critiques of other models elite democracy – there is no such thing as an elite that is not self-interested and will look after the good of the general masses liberal democracy – emphasis on individual rights is used to limit government in order to protect small, priveleged groups

27 Models of Democracy elite democracy
most important goal is the general welfare requires an elite capable of pursuing the long-term interests of society actually values low mass participation elite democratic critiques of other models

28 Models of Democracy elite democracy
most important goal is the general welfare requires an elite capable of pursuing the long-term interests of society actually values low mass participation elite democratic critiques of other models liberal democracy – undue focus on individual rights limits government’s ability to pursue the general welfare of the community

29 Models of Democracy elite democracy
most important goal is the general welfare requires an elite capable of pursuing the long-term interests of society actually values low mass participation elite democratic critiques of other models liberal democracy – undue focus on individual rights limits government’s ability to pursue the general welfare of the community majoritarian democracy – masses are too uninterested, incompetent or, at worst, dangerous to be given control over decision-making

30 Models of Democracy liberal democracy
most important goal is protecting individual rights does not prefer low mass participation but may be willing to accept it liberal democratic critiques of other models

31 Models of Democracy liberal democracy
most important goal is protecting individual rights does not prefer low mass participation but may be willing to accept it liberal democratic critiques of other models elite democracy – if unchecked, elites will use power to infringe the rights of individuals

32 Models of Democracy liberal democracy
most important goal is protecting individual rights does not prefer low mass participation but may be willing to accept it liberal democratic critiques of other models elite democracy – if unchecked, elites will use power to infringe the rights of individuals majoritarian democracy – if unchecked, majority will infringe the rights of minorities (tyranny of the majority)

33 Models of Democracy – Viewing Democracy Over Time
elite democrats the masses will always be incapable of making decisions for the long-term common good liberal democrats elites and the majorities will always be prone to infringing individual rights if given the chance majoritarian democrats elites will always be self-serving masses can learn over time to become better democratic citizens if given a meaningful opportunity to do so elite and liberal democrats would argue that the risk is too great

34 Where’s the Canadian Political System?
Democracy: Where’s the Canadian Political System? Individual Rights/Limited Gov’t Liberal Democracy High Mass Participation Low Mass Participation Canada Canada Majoritarian Democracy Elite Democracy General Welfare

35 Where’s the Canadian Political System Going?
Democracy: Where’s the Canadian Political System Going? Individual Rights/Limited Gov’t Liberal Democracy High Mass Participation Low Mass Participation Canada Canada ? Majoritarian Democracy Elite Democracy General Welfare

36 Bureaucracy and Democracy

37

38 Liberal Democracy and Bureaucracy
confluence bureaucracy is good in that it emphasis impartiality (over participation) dissonance danger is if bureaucracy becomes too powerful and threatens individual rights “Big Brother”

39 Elite Democracy and Bureaucracy
confluence top-down and hierarchical nature of bureaucracy is good effective mechanism to pursue the general welfare dissonance danger if bureaucracy becomes too powerful and undermines competition among elected/political elites e.g. development of a permanent non-elected bureaucratic elite making decisions ultimately decisions must be ratified by elected elites

40 Participatory Democracy and Bureaucracy
confluence effective mechanism to pursue the general welfare e.g. to put into effect the will of the majority dissonance top-down hierarchical nature of bureaucracy is bad excessive focus on impartiality (over participation) is bad

41 Main Messages!! Democracy Bureaucracy
there are different models of democracy – NOT one shared vision of democracy Bureaucracy in tension with all models of democracy range bureaucracy is necessary for democracy (elite democracy) bureaucracy undermines democracy (participatory democracy) relationship with democracy is paradoxical (depending on model of democracy)

42


Download ppt "Bureaucracy (cont’d) September 19th, 2006 (Negative?) Attributes of Bureaucracy rigid red-tape (inefficient) stifles creativity top-down not responsive."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google