Straw readout status Status and plans in Prague compared with situation now Choke and error Conclusions and plans.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LHCb Upgrade Overview ALICE, ATLAS, CMS & LHCb joint workshop on DAQ Château de Bossey 13 March 2013 Beat Jost / Cern.
Advertisements

1 MICE Tracker Readout Update, Preparation for Cosmic Ray Tests Introduction/Overview AFE-IIt firmware development VLSB firmware development Hardware progress.
28 August 2002Paul Dauncey1 Readout electronics for the CALICE ECAL and tile HCAL Paul Dauncey Imperial College, University of London, UK For the CALICE-UK.
6 June 2002UK/HCAL common issues1 Paul Dauncey Imperial College Outline: UK commitments Trigger issues DAQ issues Readout electronics issues Many more.
Octal ASD Certification Tests at Michigan J. Chapman, Tiesheng Dai, & Tuan Bui August 30, CERN.
Uli Schäfer 1 JEM1: Status and plans power Jet Sum R S T U VME CC RM ACE CAN Flash TTC JEM1.0 status JEM1.1 Plans.
LAV firmware status Francesco Gonnella Mauro Raggi 23 rd May 2012 TDAQ Working Group Meeting.
LKr readout: present and future R. Fantechi 30/8/2012.
Sub- Nyquist Sampling System Hardware Implementation System Architecture Group – Shai & Yaron Data Transfer, System Integration and Debug Environment Part.
Emlyn Corrin, DPNC, University of Geneva EUDAQ Status of the EUDET JRA1 DAQ software Emlyn Corrin, University of Geneva 1.
Straw electronics Straw Readout Board (SRB). Full SRB - IO Handling 16 covers – Input 16*2 links 400(320eff) Mbits/s Control – TTC – LEMO – VME Output.
Trigger Supervisor (TS) J. William Gu Data Acquisition Group 1.TS position in the system 2.First prototype TS 3.TS functions 4.TS test status.
The GANDALF Multi-Channel Time-to-Digital Converter (TDC)  GANDALF module  TDC concepts  TDC implementation in the FPGA  measurements.
Status of NA62 straw electronics and services Peter LICHARD, Johan Morant, Vito PALLADINO.
Plans for the 2015 Run Vito Palladino Straw Working Group 2/2/2015.
PicoTDC Features of the picoTDC (operating at 1280 MHz with 64 delay cells) Focus of the unit on very small time bins, 12ps basic, 3ps interpolation Interpolation.
PHENIX upgrade DAQ Status/ HBD FEM experience (so far) The thoughts on the PHENIX DAQ upgrade –Slow download HBD test experience so far –GTM –FEM readout.
Status of the Beam Phase and Intensity Monitor for LHCb Richard Jacobsson Zbigniew Guzik Federico Alessio TFC Team: Motivation Aims Overview of the board.
FADC progress in Vienna Reported by H.Ishino for Vienna FADC group M.Pernicka and H.Steininger.
HBD FEM Overall block diagram Individual building blocks Outlook ¼ detector build.
EUDRB: the data reduction board of the EUDET pixel telescope Lorenzo Chiarelli, Angelo Cotta Ramusino, Livio Piemontese, Davide Spazian Università & INFN.
Muon Electronics Upgrade Present architecture Remarks Present scenario Alternative scenario 1 The Muon Group.
Features of the new Alibava firmware: 1. Universal for laboratory use (readout of stand-alone detector via USB interface) and for the telescope readout.
Xiangming Sun1PXL Sensor and RDO review – 06/23/2010 STAR XIANGMING SUN LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LAB Firmware and Software Architecture for PIXEL L.
Analysis trains – Status & experience from operation Mihaela Gheata.
Status of NA62 straw electronics Webs Covers Services Readout.
FPGA firmware of DC5 FEE. Outline List of issue Data loss issue Command error issue (DCM to FEM) Command lost issue (PC with USB connection to GANDALF)
NA62 straw tracker readout status Georgios Konstantinou
LHCb front-end electronics and its interface to the DAQ.
SoLiD/PVDIS DAQ Alexandre Camsonne. DAQ limitations Electronics Data transfer.
CERN, 18 december 2003Coincidence Matrix ASIC PRR Coincidence ASIC modifications E.Petrolo, R.Vari, S.Veneziano INFN-Rome.
JRA-1 Meeting, Jan 25th 2007 A. Cotta Ramusino, INFN Ferrara 1 EUDRB: A VME-64x based DAQ card for MAPS sensors. STATUS REPORT.
NA62 straw readout Characterization and qualification of the frontend electronics Detector and interface to frontend Small readout system Plans Expected.
Trigger matched firmware Top Level block diagram 4ch 3.2gbps deserializer “Test Assembly 1” Module Latency buffer 1GB DDR2 DRAM a.c.r The GTKRO.
Peter LICHARD CERN (NA62)1 NA62 Straw tracker electronics Study of different readout schemes Readout electronics frontend backend Plans.
1 Programming of FPGA in LiCAS ADC for Continuous Data Readout Week 7 Report Friday 15 th August 2008 Jack Hickish.
DDRIII BASED GENERAL PURPOSE FIFO ON VIRTEX-6 FPGA ML605 BOARD PART B PRESENTATION STUDENTS: OLEG KORENEV EUGENE REZNIK SUPERVISOR: ROLF HILGENDORF 1 Semester:
TEL62 AND TDCB UPDATE JACOPO PINZINO ROBERTO PIANDANI CERN ON BEHALF OF PISA GROUP 14/10/2015.
DAQ interface + implications for the electronics Niko Neufeld LHCb Electronics Upgrade June 10 th, 2010.
SRB data transmission Vito Palladino CERN 2 June 2014.
LKr readout and trigger R. Fantechi 3/2/2010. The CARE structure.
18/05/2000Richard Jacobsson1 - Readout Supervisor - Outline Readout Supervisor role and design philosophy Trigger distribution Throttling and buffer control.
FW and HW Status TDAQ WG 10/6/2015. Hardware MPOD: ◦ HV was NOT floating   Sensibility of current limit to external devices  Particularly for chamber.
3 Sep 2009SLM1 of 12 SLM performance and limitations based on HW tests.
The NA62 Spectrometer Acquisition System TWEPP 2015, Lisbon Peter Lichard and Vito Palladino - CERN On Behalf of NA62 Straw Working Group.
SL-PGA firmware overview M. Sozzi Pisa - January 30/31, 2014.
Plans for the 2015 Run Michal Koval, Peter Lichard and Vito Palladino TDAQ Working Group 25/3/2015.
Grzegorz Korcyl - Jagiellonian University, Kraków Grzegorz Korcyl – PANDA TDAQ Workshop, Giessen April 2010.
Software and TDAQ Peter Lichard, Vito Palladino NA62 Collaboration Meeting, Sept Ferrara.
Sumary of the LKr WG R. Fantechi 31/8/2012. SLM readout restart First goal – Test the same configuration as in 2010 (rack TS) – All old power supplies.
PC-based L0TP Status Report “on behalf of the Ferrara L0TP Group” Ilaria Neri University of Ferrara and INFN - Italy Ferrara, September 02, 2014.
Straw (T)DAQ Peter Lichard, Vito Palladino NA62 Collaboration Meeting, Sept Ferrara.
Calliope-Louisa Sotiropoulou FTK: E RROR D ETECTION AND M ONITORING Aristotle University of Thessaloniki FTK WORKSHOP, ALEXANDROUPOLI: 10/03/2014.
DHH at DESY Test Beam 2016 Igor Konorov TUM Physics Department E18 19-th DEPFET workshop May Kloster Seeon Overview: DHH system overview DHE/DHC.
“Technical run experience” Gianluca Lamanna (CERN) TDAQ meeting
SuperB-DCH S ervizio E lettronico L aboratori F rascati 1LNF-SuperB Workshop – September 2010G. Felici DCH FEE STATUS Some ideas for Level 1 Triggered.
THIS MORNING (Start an) informal discussion to -Clearly identify all open issues, categorize them and build an action plan -Possibly identify (new) contributing.
Straw readout status Run 2016 Cover FW SRB FW.
ATLAS Pre-Production ROD Status SCT Version
Status of NA62 straw readout
Enrico Gamberini for the GTK WG TDAQ WG Meeting June 01, 2016
Vito Palladino Straw Working Group 23/3/2015
From SNATS to SCATS C. Beigbeder1, D. Breton1,F.Dulucq1, L. Leterrier2, J. Maalmi1, V. Tocut1, Ph. Vallerand3 1 : LAL Orsay, France (IN2P3 – CNRS) 2 :
Electronics, Trigger and DAQ for SuperB
Status of the Beam Phase and Intensity Monitor for LHCb
COVER Full production should arrive today
Run experience Cover FW SRB FW DAQ and monitoring
New DCM, FEMDCM DCM jobs DCM upgrade path
PID meeting Mechanical implementation Electronics architecture
TELL1 A common data acquisition board for LHCb
Presentation transcript:

Straw readout status Status and plans in Prague compared with situation now Choke and error Conclusions and plans

Start of 2015 run (Prague) Expected smooth start due to Experience 2014 Number of improvements problems with 2015 startup SOB, EOB delay trig latency obsolete data cleaning Stable data taking since couple of weeks Observed problems Duplicated words Missing (hidden by above?) trailing edges Timing adjustment for T0 Some covers moving +/- 1 clock cycle at the start of run 1 SRB front-end interface chip not functional after incident 1 HV line not stable Some problems solved Data corruption very complex problem Extra words turned out to be also triplicated Nonsense data at high beam intensity Padding hiding data or missing Etc. Data corruption Padding fixed in Ethernet intf Duplicated words fixed in Ethernet intf Triplicated and extra words fixed in trigger- matching Still small amount of data with duplicated words coming possibly from frontend ~10% of trailing edges missing? Now

Prague meeting Now – October 2015

Straw readout consolidation/improvement since December 2014 (Prague) Improvements of existing FW and bug fixes Startup of 2.5Gb/s links – added extra ‘0’ to the alignment pattern Stability of 2.5Gb/s links – ALTERA bug fix Startup of 400Mb/s links to cover, link completely redone Re-synchronizing FIFOs added to links outputs Increasing the speed of data merging to prepare for high intensity beam Coarse T0 setting (0->255) for the whole board and fine T0 setting (0->7) for every cover Startup of 2.5Gb/s links Still a problem on some links Possibly ‘link back’ alignement Stability of links OK Fine T0 not usable now because of control link corruption (version 9) Now

Improvements for full intensity beam (Prague) Cover new FW ready for test Faster data multiplexing with look-ahead bigger derandomization buffer Data transmission up to 13 MHz measurements (leading/trailing edges) E.g. 10 straws in ‘hot’ place with ~600kHz average rate FE_INTF FPGA on SRB Fast data multiplexing Bigger derandomization buffer FW ready for test together with cover T0 adjustment EVENT_MGR FPGA on SRB Include second Ethernet interface Monitoring of trigger matched data (DDR3 memory readable through VME - Implement block writing to DDR3 Not done VME_MGR FPGA on SRB VME monitoring - Implement block writing to DDR3 Use block data transfer on VME side (single access ~2MB/s, block access ~80MB/s) Not done Cover FW not tested yet due to other priorities FE intf version 9 problem with control link Majority of work on this FPGA, number of bug fixes Work on monitoring improvement postponed Now

Choke and error Straw readout system is designed to withstand high data flows without crashes Only 3 places where the incoming data rate is higher then outgoing Cover New FW should fulfil the requirement for covers close to the beam Average 600kHz/straw Spikes handled with big derandomizer FIFO In the case of FIFO full Event is shed Problem registered and both sent to DAQ and ready for monitoring No request for choke/error If particle rate higher then designed/expected in TD Increase link speed (20% improvement) Add another data link (80% improvement) Trigger matching Incoming theoretical rate of measurements 120MHz (4 x 2.5Gb/s links) Big FIFOs on all 4 links to handle spikes in data rate If FIFO full Problem registered for monitoring Possible to handle ~50MHz (possibility to improve to 80MHz) Expected from TD ~30Mhz Possible to generate choke at this place, but deemed not needed

Choke and error Only 3 places where the incoming data rate is higher then outgoing (cont) Ethernet links 4 event building buffers Buffers multiplexed to 2 Ethernet links (1 at current FW) If no more event buffers free for event building Backpressure to trigger matching output FIFO Generate choke at almost full Normally should not happen as 2 links should cover 140% nominal data flow We have not considered generation of ‘error’ till now Can be generated in case of ‘catastrophic’ scenario Ethernet link down ???

Known problems SRB Duplicated/missing words Small number Frontend Possibly fixed with new FW on cover and SRB(FE_intf) T0 adjustment can not be used now Need to fix control link Expected to fix also +/- 1 clock cycle T0 movement Start of high speed links sometimes difficult Recheck start procedure MEP factor > 1 does not work

Conclusion and plans Major improvement since Prague meeting Straw DAQ is stable and reliable Tested ~100% efficiency at 40% beam intensity Straw readout is designed to work in stable condition with 100% beam intensity Current FW allows to work at 100% efficiency up to ~70% of beam intensity For 100% efficiency at 100% intensity we need to Test new cover FW Investigate and fix control link in Fe_intf v9 V9 contains number of speed improvements Fix MEP packing Add second Ethernet link Other Test new cover FW New features for monitoring and data quality control Investigate and fix control link in Fe_intf v9 Expected to fix T0 move at run start Improvement of raw and trigger-matched data VME monitoring