Robert R. Wilson Prize Talk John Peoples April APS Meeting: February 14, 2010 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ISS meeting, (1) R. Garoby (for the SPL study group) SPL-based Proton Driver for Facilities SPL-based Proton Driver for Facilities at CERN:
Advertisements

Electron Cooling in the Accumulator McGinnis Electron Cooling in the Accumulator Dave McGinnis.
1 Methods of Experimental Particle Physics Alexei Safonov Lecture #8.
CESR as Light Source David L. Rubin for the CESR Operations Group Cornell University Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics.
1 Proton Upgrades at Fermilab Robert Zwaska Fermilab March 12, 2007 Midwest Accelerator Physics Collaboration Meeting Indiana University Cyclotron Facility.
Run II Status and Prospects - Spalding1 Run II Status and Prospects Jeff Spalding Fermilab June 14, 2004.
A. Bay Beijing October Accelerators We want to study submicroscopic structure of particles. Spatial resolution of a probe ~de Broglie wavelength.
Re-commissioning the Recycler Storage Ring at Fermilab Martin Murphy, Fermilab Presented August 10, 2012 at SLAC National Laboratory for the Workshop on.
The Fermilab Antiproton Source Keith Gollwitzer Antiproton Source Department Accelerator Division Fermilab 3 December 2007.
ALPHA Storage Ring Indiana University Xiaoying Pang.
Paul Derwent 30 Nov 00 1 The Fermilab Accelerator Complex o Series of presentations  Overview of FNAL Accelerator Complex  Antiprotons: Stochastic Cooling.
F UEC - 6 Oct 06 Recent FNAL Collider Operations Ron Moore Fermilab – Tevatron Dept.
The LHC: an Accelerated Overview Jonathan Walsh May 2, 2006.
The Tevatron Collider: A Thirty Year Campaign Fermilab Colloquium March 10, 2010 John Peoples 1.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
Toward a Test Facility for an ERL Circulator Ring Based e-Cooler MEIC Electron Cooler Test Facility Planning Retreat January 31, 2012.
Proton Plans at Fermilab Robert Zwaska - Fermilab Science and Engineering at Henderson- DUSEL Capstone Workshop Stony Brook University May 5, 2006 Outline.
F MI High Power Operation and Future Plans Ioanis Kourbanis (presented by Bruce Brown) HB2008 August 25, 2008.
Antiproton Source Capabilities and Issues Keith Gollwitzer & Valeri Lebedev Accelerator Division Fermilab 1.
11 Overview of the Tevatron Collider V.S. Morozov Old Dominion University Muons, Inc. Collider Review Retreat, Jefferson Lab, February 24, 2010.
Paul Derwent 18-Oct-15 1 Stochastic Cooling in the Fermilab AntiProton Source Paul Derwent Beams Division/Pbar/CDF Sunday, October 18, 2015.
INTRODUCTION  RECYCLER BPM – Original system not adequate to measure beam position precisely. It is being upgraded to meet the required physics precision.
Eric Prebys, FNAL. USPAS, Knoxville, TN, January 20-31, 2014 Lecture 20 - Cooling 2 Anti-protons are created by hitting a target with an energetic proton.
AAC February 4-6, 2003 Protons on Target Ioanis Kourbanis MI/Beams.
F All Experimenters' Mtg - 28 Jul 03 Week in Review: 07/21/03 –07/28/03 Keith Gollwitzer – FNAL Stores and Operations Summary Standard Plots.
F 19 August 2002 All Experimenters Meeting Beams Week in Review Continued to work on providing Luminosity L  N p N a /  –Stacking rate –Coalescing efficiency.
December 5, Chuck Ankenbrandt Fermilab Muon Collider Design Project X as a Hi-Rep-Rate Driver for a Muon Collider Chuck Ankenbrandt.
F 1 MW Proton Beam for Neutrinos Dave McGinnis AAC Meeting May 10, 2006.
Run II Operational Status and Plans Run II Meeting October 28, 2004 Dave McGinnis.
Paul Derwent 14 Dec 00 1 Stochastic Cooling Paul Derwent 14 Dec 00
All Experimenters' Mtg - Aug. 04, 2003 Week in Review: 07/28/03 –08/03/03 Doug Moehs – FNAL Stores and Operations Summary Standard Plots.
S. Pordes - to part of CD 09/10/031 Introduction to some Beams Division jargon in some order…see how far we get:
Accumulator Stacktail Cooling Paul Derwent December 18, 2015.
F All Experimenters' Mtg - 2 Jun 03 Weeks in Review: 05/19/03 –06/02/03 Keith Gollwitzer – FNAL Stores and Operations Summary Standard Plots.
Fermilab Run 2 Accelerator Status and Upgrades
Updated Overview of Run II Upgrade Plan Beam Instrumentation Bob Webber Run II Luminosity Upgrade Review February 2004.
Doug Michael Sep. 16, GeV protons 1.9 second cycle time 4x10 13 protons/pulse 0.4 MW! Single turn extraction (10  s) 4x10 20 protons/year 700.
Preliminary MEIC Ion Beam Formation Scheme Jiquan Guo for the MEIC design study team Oct. 5,
Run II PMG 1/19/06 Pushpa Bhat 1 Run II Upgrades Status January 2006 Pushpa Bhat.
 A model of beam line built with G4Beamline (scripting tool for GEANT4)  Simulated performance downstream of the AC Dipole for core of beam using  x.
Anatomy of Accelerators Marty Peters Summer 2006.
Synchronization Issues in MEIC Andrew Hutton, Slava Derbenev and Yuhong Zhang MEIC Ion Complex Design Mini-Workshop Jan. 27 & 28, 2011.
Status of the Accelerator Complex Keith Gollwitzer Antiproton Source Accelerator Division Fermilab 2009 Fermilab Users’ Meeting.
Users' Mtg - 4 Jun 08 FNAL Accelerator Complex Status Ron Moore Fermilab – AD / Tevatron Dept.
F A Fermilab Roadmap Dave McGinnis May 28, f Fermilab Roadmap - McGinnis Timelines  Divide the road map into three parallel paths  ILC - Energy.
Early Beam Injection Scheme for the Fermilab Booster: A Path for Intensity Upgrade Chandra Bhat Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory DPF2015, ANN ARBOR,
F Record luminosities at the Tevatron & Future potentiality Steve Werkema Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Batavia, Illinois USA Asian Particle Accelerator.
F Possible Proton Capabilities at Fermilab Dave McGinnis April 16, 2007.
F HCP 2007 Performance and Future of the Tevatron Ron Moore Fermilab - Tevatron Dept. Tevatron overview and performance Antiproton source + Recycler overview.
Beam time structures 1 At any particular instance of time there will be only one kind of beam in the MI. It will be either protons or anti-protons. The.
NuFACT06 Muon Source at Fermilab David Neuffer Fermilab.
LER Workshop, Oct 11, 2006Intensity Increase in the LER – T. Sen1 LHC Accelerator Research Program bnl-fnal-lbnl-slac  Motivation  Slip stacking in the.
Pbar Production Status & Plans to get to 25mA/hr Keith Gollwitzer Antiproton Source August 31, 2006.
Run II Status Keith Gollwitzer Temple Review July 1, 2003.
CESR as Light Source David Rubin for the CESR Operations Group Cornell University Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics.
F Project X: Recycler 8.9 GeV/c Extraction D. Johnson, E. Prebys, M. Martens, J. Johnstone Fermilab Accelerator Advisory Committee August 8, 2007 D. Johnson.
Overview of Project X ICD and RD&D Plans David Neuffer material from Paul Derwent & Sergei Nagaitsev (AAC Meeting, February 3, 2009)
Pre-Meeting Meeting Brian Drendel Accelerator Shift Plot.
Considerations on RF systems of SPPC collider and its injector chain
Top-Up Injection for PEP-II and Applications to a Higgs Factory
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat Other Electron-Ion Colliders: eRHIC, ENC & LHeC Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
JLEIC ion fullsize booster (2256m) space charge limit (Δν=0
JLEIC 200 GeV Ion Injector Chain and Bunch Formation
MEIC New Baseline: Luminosity Performance and Upgrade Path
MEIC New Baseline: Part 7
MEIC New Baseline: Performance and Accelerator R&D
HE-JLEIC: Do We Have a Baseline?
SC Magnets with Small Apertures for JLEIC*
JLEIC Ion Beam Formation options for 200 GeV
Presentation transcript:

Robert R. Wilson Prize Talk John Peoples April APS Meeting: February 14,

Fermilab

Tevatron I Complex ( ) 3

Tevatron I Luminosity Parameters 4

TeV I Antiproton Source 5

Single batch stochastic cooling The Debuncher cools one batch of ~ 10 8 pbars at a time for s (one Main Ring cycle) and then transfers the batch to the Accumulator. The cooling time is proportional to the number of particles (N), the mixing (M), the noise to signal ration (U) and inversely proportional to the bandwidth (W) T = ε (dε/dt) -1 α N(M+U)/W Typical initial cooling times are about 0.5 s. 6

Injection, Stacking and Cooling in the Accumulator 7

Stack tail cooling system The stack tail pickups are placed in a region of high dispersion (9 m). A displacement of 10 mm radially inward corresponds to an energy decrease of 10 MeV. The gain of the stack tail pickups decreases exponentially with the radial distance from the pickups, which is proportional to energy. The beam is cooled slowly where dN/dE is large and quickly where dN/dE is small. An exponential increase in dN/dE will provide a constant flux of pbars into the core momentum cooling system. 8

Stack Tail Momentum Distribution with 4 x10 11 pbars 9

Evolution of the stack tail and core with time 10

Core Momentum Spread vs. Stack Size 11

Transverse Emittance vs. Stack Size 12

Extraction fraction vs. Stack Size 13

Run Statistics 14

Phase I Upgrade of the Fermilab Accelerator Complex The elements of the phase I upgrade for run I were: Matched low beta insertions for CDF (B0) and D0 System of electrostatic separators to reduce the number of beam-crossings to two (CDF and D0) Linac energy upgrade from 200 MeV to 400 MeV Improvements to the pbar target station and cooling systems Improvements to the controls and beam position monitors systems 15

Longitudinal Emittance vs. Booster Bunch intensity 16

Transverse Emittance vs. Booster Bunch Intensity 17

Run I Performance Statistics 18

Phase II Upgrade for Run II 19

Elements of the Phase II Upgrade Main Injector replaces the Main Ring and does all of its functions much better Recycler provides a third and substantially better cooling system with electron and stochastic cooling. A set of injection kickers to enable 36 bunch operation Bandwidths of all pbar source cooling systems doubled Significant improvements to the controls and beam position monitor systems to make transfers faster and more efficient (especially pbars). 20

Main Injector Main Injector is 150/120 GeV proton synchrotron with a circumference of 3.3 km. Its functions for colliding beams are: – Accepts 8 GeV protons from the Booster, accelerates them to 120 GeV and delivers them to the Pbar target station for pbar production and subsequent collection in the pbar source. – Accepts short bunch trains of 8 GeV pbars from the Recycler and 8 GeV protons from the Booster, accelerates them to 150 GeV, coalesces them in to 4 bunches for pbars and 2 bunches for protons and then transfers them to the Tevatron. 21

Main Injector and Recycler 22

Recycler The Recycler is an 8 GeV storage ring for pbars. It is made mainly of permanent alternating gradient magnets. Pbars are transferred from the Accumulator after stacks of 25 x have been accumulated. The typical time between transfers is 1 hr. The accumulator stacking rate for these small stacks is x /hr. The pbars are cooled and stashed by a few x 100 mA cold relativistic electron beam (4.3 MeV). The stash size can be up to 500 x and the accumulation rate does not decline with stash size. Typically stashes are mined when the stash is > 400 x The formation of dense bunches in the Main Injector at 150 GeV and subsequent coalescing is very efficient. Typically the transfer efficiency from Recycler to the Tevatron at low β is > 80%. 23

Stacking Rate vs. Stack Size during Run I 24

Selection of the number of Bunches, B L is proportional to B The bunch spacing is determined by the selected sub-harmonic of the Tevatron 53 MHz RF system (h=3 x7 x53 = 1113). – h=53 provides a bunch spacing of 396 ns. It is being used in Run II to produce 3 groups of 12 bunches with 400 ns spacing for each beam. – The separation of the groups, about 2 µ s, is used for aborts, injection and cogging. – 36 bunches/beam is standard in Run II. 25

Collider Operation with the Main Injector and Recycler Each beam has 36 bunches and circulates on helical orbits separated by > 5 sigma except at B0 (CDF) and D0 where the beams collide N p is limited to < 30 x /bunch in order to keep the pbar beam-beam tune shift to <.025. When this is exceeded the initial luminosity lifetime decreases < 6 hr quickly 2.7 x protons/bunch are consistently delivered to low β with a bunch coalescing efficiency of 70%. The luminosity lifetime is typically 6 hr. N pbar is generally in the range of 7 to 9 x /bunch. The peak L is between 2.8 to 3.2 x cm -2 s -1 when a full stash of 400 x is available. The record peak L is 3.47 x cm -2 s

Tevatron Performance for Run Ib and Goals for Run II 27

Peak Luminosity Run II 28

Run II Integrated Luminosity as of 8 Feb

Tevatron Complex in

Additional Slides 31

Selection of the number of Bunches, B L is proportional to B The bunch spacing is determined by the selected sub-harmonic of the Tevatron 53 MHz RF system (h=3 x7 x53 = 1113). – h=3 is the minimum value to provide collisions at B0 (CDF) and D0. h=3 was used in – 2 groups of h=3 bunches were used to produce 6 bunches/beam in and Run I. – h=53 provides a bunch spacing of 400 ns. It was used Run II to produce 3 groups of 12 bunches with 400 ns spacing for each beam. The separation of groups is about 2 µ s. 36 bunches/beam is standard in Run II. 32