Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Synchronization Issues in MEIC Andrew Hutton, Slava Derbenev and Yuhong Zhang MEIC Ion Complex Design Mini-Workshop Jan. 27 & 28, 2011.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Synchronization Issues in MEIC Andrew Hutton, Slava Derbenev and Yuhong Zhang MEIC Ion Complex Design Mini-Workshop Jan. 27 & 28, 2011."— Presentation transcript:

1 Synchronization Issues in MEIC Andrew Hutton, Slava Derbenev and Yuhong Zhang MEIC Ion Complex Design Mini-Workshop Jan. 27 & 28, 2011

2 The Problem Electrons travel at the speed of light Protons and ions are slower There are three areas that need to be addressed In collider ring  matching electron & ion beams at multiple IPs During acceleration Cooling  matching ion beam and cooling electron beam Assumptions MEIC collider ring circumference is around 1 km Large booster (LEIC) is the same circumference as MEIC Electron ring is the same circumference as MEIC Superconducting RF systems have limited frequency swing

3 Harmonic Numbers Assuming circumference of the MEIC collider ring is about 1 km For an RF frequency of 1497 MHz The best harmonic number is 4860 = 2x2x3x3x3x3x3x5 Corresponds to a circumference of 971.98 meter For an RF Frequency of 748.5 MHz The harmonic number is 2430 For an RF Frequency of 499 MHz The harmonic number is 1620

4 Orbit Differences in MEIC MEIC design parameters Proton energy 20 to 60 GeVBunch repetition rate 748.5 MHz Deuteron energy 10 to 30 GeV/uCollider ring circumference ~1000 m Lead energy 7.9 to 23.8 GeV/u Harmonic number2500 Orbit difference from 1000 m ring @ 60 GeV proton design point proton 60 GeV design point 20 GeV  -97.9 cm  2.44 bunch spacing  2 unit of HN deuteron: 30 GeV/u  -36.7 cm  0.92 bunch spacing  1 unit of HN 10 GeV/u  -429 cm  10.7 bunch spacing  11 unit of HN Lead: 23.8 GeV/u  -65.7 cm  1.64 bunch spacing  2 unit of HN 7.9 GeV/u  -692cm  17.3 bunch spacing  17 unit of HN MEIC Circulator Cooler Energy range 4.3 to 32.7 MeVBunch repetition rate 748.5 MHz γ 8.4 to 63.9Circulator ring circumference ~ 50 m β 0.9929 to 0.9999 Harmonic number125 Orbit difference cooling proton@20 GeV/u -4.9 cm  0.1 wavelength  no change of HN cooling lead@7.9 GeV/u -35 cm  0.86 wavelength  1 unit of HN

5 Harmonic Number vs. Proton Energy The proton energy that corresponds to a harmonic number of 1 less than the nominal is 43.32 GeV for 1497 MHz 31.77 GeV for 748.5 MHz 25.77 GeV for 499 MHz For 750 MHz, change of harmonic numbers is not a viable solution for the 20 – 60 GeV energy range It is a viable solution at lower energies

6 Two Interaction Regions The two Interaction Regions are 180°apart for both beams in the present configuration Arcs are equal and straight sections are equal Offsetting the beam in the Arcs would work Putting two Interaction Regions in a single straight will not work without an additional variable chicane Chicane is complicated in this region Magnet offset ~1 meter for 2 mm path length change MEIC can have up to two interaction regions Must be equidistant in ring There can be one more interaction region in LEIC

7 Change Ion Ring Path Length It is possible to change the path length in the ion ring For one Interaction Point, need +/- 20 cm For two Interaction Points, need +/- 40 cm If path length is created in the arcs 20 cm corresponds to an offset of about ±25 mm 40 cm corresponds to an offset of about ±50 mm Increasing the bore of a 6 Tesla magnet by 30 mm is expensive! 60 mm may be prohibitive Need to mount all the magnets on movers Unpleasant, but possibly affordable

8 Three Ring Collider Proposal The MEIC ring should be used to cover the higher energies RF frequency will be fixed Electron ring and ion ring will use SRF cavities Ion ring magnets will be on movers to accommodate velocity change The LEIC ring will be used to cover lower energies The LEIC ring will need variable RF frequency Ion ring will require RF cavities that can span a wide frequency range Could be a sub-harmonic of MEIC ring Injected bunch trains would be interleaved using an RF separator

9 Alternate Solution: Change of Electron Path & RF Frequency The scheme does not require change of the ion orbit which is considered far more difficult to realize for SC magnets. It rather varies RF frequency (less than ±10 -3 ) Ion ring harmonic number Electron orbit (less than half wavelength for one IP and one wavelength for two IPs) Circulator cooler ring circumference (less than half bunch spacing) Nominal SchemeAlternate Scheme Ion OrbitVaryingFixed Electron orbitFixedVarying e-cooler orbitVarying Ion ring harmonic numberVarying Electron ring harmonic numberFixed Bunch frequencyFixedVarying

10 EnergyCollider RingCirculator Cooler ProtonDeut.LeadγβHarmonicfδf/f 0 δLeδLe δReδRe HarmonicδLcδLc δRcδRc GeV/uNumberMHz10 -4 cm Numbercm 6063.950.999882500748.500012500 5558.620.999852500748.483-0.232.30.2812500 5053.290.999822500748.457-0.545.40.6412500 4547.960.999792500748.429-0.959.531.1412500 4042.630.999722500748.386-1.5315.31.8312500 37.539.970.999692500748.357-1.9119.12.2812500 3537.30.999642501748.6221.63-16.3-1.95125-2.0-0.24 32.534.640.999582501748.5791.05-10.5-1.26125-2.0-0.24 30 31.970.999512501748.5260.33-3.29-0.39125-2.0-0.24 29.04 30.950.999482501748.5000125-2.0-0.24 28 29.840.999442501748.470-0.403.960.47125-2.0-0.24 26 27.710.999352501748.403-1.2912.951.55125-2.0-0.24 25 26.650.999302501748.363-1.8318.282.18125-2.0-0.24 24 25.580.999242502748.6181.5715.71.88125-4.0-0.48 23 24.510.999172502748.5670.89-8.93-1.07125-4.0-0.48 21.86 23.30.999082502748.5000125-4.0-0.48 21 22.380.999002502748.442-0.777.730.92125-4.0-0.48 20 21.320.998902502748.366-1.8017.992.15125-4.0-0.48 18.26 19.460.998682503748.5000125-6.0-0.72 16.01 17.060.998282504748.5000125-8.0-0.95 14.42 15.370.997882505748.5000125-10.0-1.2 MEIC with One IP Change of ring radius

11 EnergyCollider RingCirculator Cooler ProtonDeut.LeadγβHarmonicfδf/f 0 δLeδLe δReδRe HarmonicδLcδLc δRcδRc GeV/uNumberMHz10 -4 cm Numbercm 6063.950.999882500748.500012500 5558.620.999852500748.483-0.232.30.2812500 5053.290.999822500748.457-0.545.40.6412500 4547.960.999792500748.429-0.959.531.1412500 4042.630.999722500748.386-1.5315.31.8312500 3537.30.999642500748.323-2.3723.82.8412500 30 31.970.999512502748.225-3.6736.84.3912500 28 29.840.999442502748.7703.60-36.1-4.30125-4.0-0.48 26 27.710.999352502748.7022.70-27.1-3.23125-4.0-0.48 24 25.580.999242502748.6181.5715.7-1.88125-4.0-0.48 23 24.510.999172502748.5670.89-8.93-1.07125-4.0-0.48 21.86 23.30.999082502748.5000125-4.0-0.48 20 21.320.998902502748.366-1.8018.02.15125-4.0-0.48 19 20.250.998782502748.276-3.0029.93.57125-4.0-0.48 18 19.180.998642504748.7703.61-36.1-4.31125-8.0-0.95 17 18.120.998042504748.6461.96-19.6-2.34125-8.0-0.95 16.01 17.060.998282504748.5000125-8.0-0.95 15 15.990.998172504748.321-2.3924.02.86125-8.0-0.95 13.23 17.060.998282506748.5000125-12.0-1.4 MEIC with 2 IPs (Half Ring Apart) Harmonic number has to be changed by unit of 2

12 Change of Collision Frequency & Electron Ring One IP Two IPs

13 Electron Cooling Electron cooling requires exact matching of the electron and ion velocities The time between adjacent buckets is 1/frequency Therefore RF frequencies must also be matched In the MEIC ring, if the RF frequency is constant (749.5 MHz) so the same electron cooling system will work at all energies Fixed frequency SRF cavities will work for energy recovery of the electron beam used for cooling

14 Circulator Ring Circumference The length of the circulator ring will need to be changed to accommodate different electron velocities The maximum change will be 1/h ion The circumference change in the circulator ring is h e λ/h ion Numerical example MEIC is ~900 metres long, h ion = 4500 Circulator ring is ~20 meters long, h e = 100 Circulator ring must change circumference by 4.5 mm for a one wavelength change in MEIC circumference This is a radius change of ~0.7 mm This is a small number so it can easily be accommodated within the circulator ring magnet bore

15 LEIC Electron Cooling The RF frequency in the LEIC ion ring has to change The circumference change in the circulator ring can be accommodated within the magnet bore The RF frequency in the electron cooling system has to change The RF frequency of the electron linac must change SRF cavities will not work Electron energy is low Propose no energy recovery for the electron beam Extend the number of turns that the electron beam is in the circulator ring Electron cooling would then be available throughout the acceleration cycle

16 Circulator Ring Assume racetrack layout as proposed in the ZDR Electron cooling occurs on one straight section Electron beam injected/extracted on opposite straight section Straight sections must have zero dispersion If injected beam is on axis, it will be on axis for cooling Injection orbit is independent of beam energy However, correct longitudinal position is not guaranteed by good injection orbit Requires Arcs to be achromatic, but not isochronous Arc energy setting must lead beam energy during ramp so path length shortens to maintain correct timing

17 Clearing Gaps Colliders usually have one (or more) gaps in the bunch train Ion clearing in electron beams Electron cloud clearing in proton or positive ion beams Required for aborting high power beams MEIC will have gaps, probably ~10% of the circumference Will reduce MEIC luminosity by ~10% RF frequencies are the same so gaps are synchronous LEIC will have gaps, also about 10% of the circumference Will reduce LEIC luminosity by at least 20% Gaps are asynchronous Could increase beam-beam effects Needs study

18 Impact of Clearing Gaps The clearing gaps impact the RF systems Stored energy in the cavities changes along the bunch train Bunch energy changes along the bunch train Transverse position in regions of non-zero dispersion changes along the bunch train Polarization precession changes along the bunch train Effect minimized with RF systems with high stored energy SRF cavities Copper cavities with storage cavities It is difficult to vary the frequency of both types of cavity


Download ppt "Synchronization Issues in MEIC Andrew Hutton, Slava Derbenev and Yuhong Zhang MEIC Ion Complex Design Mini-Workshop Jan. 27 & 28, 2011."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google