Remote Operations Methods & Plan Life in the Atacama 2004 Science & Technology Workshop Nathalie A. Cabrol NASA Ames.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Extracts from GEO Work Plan V0 To be reviewed over the Symposium (see Agenda)
Advertisements

FCMAT Response & Preparation: Process Outline October 25, 2006.
SHPE Foundation Noche de Ciencias Hands-On Activity Training NASA Mars Public Engagement Program / ASU Mars Education Program.
The Federal Proposal Process from a Proposal Management View Compliance First Proposals.
Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Application, 9 th edition. Gay, Mills, & Airasian © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
1 © 2006 by Smiths Group: Proprietary Data Smiths Group Online Performance Review Tool Training.
“Modeling the MER Mission” Chin Seah NASA Ames Research Center.
Project Management Module 3. Keep focused on the timeline Week Prepare for Kick-off Meeting Assign teams Team forming Review and execute.
WRITING PROPOSALS WITH STRONG METHODOLOGY AND IMPLEMENTATION Kusum Singh, Virginia Tech Gavin W. Fulmer, National Science Foundation 1.
Implementation of Project Governance at the Center Level
3 Dec 2003Market Operations Standing Committee1 Market Rule and Change Management Consultation Process John MacKenzie / Darren Finkbeiner / Ella Kokotsis,
 A project is “a unique endeavor to produce a set of deliverables within clearly specified time, cost and quality constraints”
Field Project Planning, Operations and Data Services Jim Moore, EOL Field Project Services (FPS) Mike Daniels, EOL Computing, Data and Software (CDS) Facility.
Growing IECA One Chapter At A Time with Meg Tully, CAE Association Development Director.
Intelligent Robotics Group NASA Ames Research Center Intelligent Robotics Group NASA Ames Research Center Planning for the Mapping and Exploration of Human.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline Learning Objectives The Mission Report Purpose and objectives What is not needed? Evolution of the.
Science Objectives & Investigation Methodology Life in the Atacama 2005 Science & Technology Workshop January 6-7, 2005 Nathalie A. Cabrol NASA Ames.
Life in the Atacama, Design Review, December 19, 2003 Carnegie Mellon SCIENCE OPS [contributions from Peter, Trey, Dom, Kristen, Kristina and Mike] Life.
Geosciences Node Ed Guinness MC Face-to-Face Meeting Washington, DC March 27-28, 2012.
Science Investigation Life in the Atacama 2004 Science & Technology Workshop Nathalie A. Cabrol NASA Ames.
ASTEP Life in the AtacamaCarnegie Mellon Limits of Life in the Atacama: Investigation of Life in the Atacama Desert of Chile Communication System Design.
Thomas C. Stein PDS Geosciences Node Washington University in St. Louis 1MS Supporting Active Surface Missions and Adding Value.
Remote operations tools, infrastructure and logistics used during the LITA 2004 expedition and development priorities for 2005 Peter Coppin EventScope.
All rights reserved © Altec ExoMars 2018 Rover Operations Control Centre Planned Organization of ROCC Operations I. Musso.
Planetary Science Archive PSA User Group Meeting #1 PSA UG #1  July 2 - 3, 2013  ESAC PSA Archiving Standards.
ESWT # Rover operations concept
COMP3615,5615 Capstone Projects Week Overview of the semester Website tour – XP and roles – Assessment – note especially the individual mark operating.
EDUC 478 Methods of Teaching Elementary Science. Contact information Rodger Hauge WLM 229 Office hours: M at 1; W at 3 (509) or
Visible/Near-Infrared Spectrometer, Thermal Infrared Spectrometer, and Neutron Detector Life in the Atacama 2004 Science & Technology Workshop J. Moersch.
QAAP Workshop (Basic). Conduct of the peer review * Commitment * Contribution to a smooth and effective process * The Developmental Engagement Report.
Life in the Atacama Life in the Atacama 2004 Science & Technology Workshop July 14-16, 2004 Carnegie Mellon University.
PROPOSED 2018 Joint Rover Mission Plans for Proposed 2018 NASA & ESA Joint Rover Mission Landing Site Selection Matt Golombek Mars Exploration Program.
LITA REMOTE EXPERIENCE INTERFACE AND INSFRASTRUCTURE 1.Science Operations Tools 1.Science Web Site [Dan Cueller (FRC)] 2.Science Operations Interface [Coppin.
Site B Introduction Life in the Atacama 2005 Science & Technology Workshop January 6-7, 2005 Pre-landing analysis Derived hypotheses Daily planning & program.
Ground-Truth Strategy Life in the Atacama 2004 Science & Technology Workshop Edmond A. Grin NASA Ames.
GLAST Science Support Center June 21, 2007 Getting Involved with GLAST GLAST Guest Investigator Program David Band, GSSC CRESST/GSFC/UMBC.
Lesson 3-Multimedia Skills. Overview Members of a multimedia team. Roles and responsibilities in a multimedia team.
HDF and HDF-EOS Workshop November 30, 2006 The Homogenization and Reporting of Groundbased Atmospheric Datasets for the Validation.
Fourth Grade Web Quest Challenge Romo Travel Agency New Volcano Tour.
APT Overview for Transiting Exoplanet Proposals Chris Moriarty – APT Developer.
Carnegie Mellon Rover Concept of Operation Life in the Atacama 2004 Science & Technology Workshop David Wettergreen The Robotics Institute Carnegie Mellon.
Assessment of Student Learning: Phase III OSU-Okmulgee’s Evidence of Student Learning.
Rover and Instrument Capabilities Life in the Atacama 2004 Science & Technology Workshop Michael Wagner, James Teza, Stuart Heys Robotics Institute, Carnegie.
Science Methods & Approach Life in the Atacama 2004 Science & Technology Workshop Nathalie A. Cabrol NASA Ames.
Key issues Why – objectives: CBM (in this case) but be clear on each stakeholder’s objectives What is their involvement – level of participation identified.
HSC Queue Mode Implementation Plan ~ Stage I, II, III ~ Tae-Soo Pyo Subaru Telescope /01/15.
Site C Introduction Life in the Atacama 2005 Science & Technology Workshop January 6-7, 2005 Pre-landing analysis Derived hypotheses Daily planning & program.
Project Planning A2 ICT Edexcel. Learning Objective To look at ways of breaking down a project into manageable stages To produce a project plan with suitable.
Pre-decisional – for Planning and Discussion Purposes Only 1 Technology Planning for Future Mars Missions Samad Hayati Manager, Mars Technology Program.
REMOTE SCIENCE INTERFACE DURING THE LIFE IN THE ATACAMA 2003 EXPEDITION Peter Coppin Remote Experience and Learning Lab STUDIO for Creative Inquiry Carnegie.
Autonomy: Executive and Instruments Life in the Atacama 2004 Science & Technology Workshop Nicola Muscettola NASA Ames Reid Simmons Carnegie Mellon.
Spectral Observations and Ground-truthing at Site C Life in the Atacama 2005 Science & Technology Workshop January 6-7, 2005 Jeff Moersch U. Tennessee.
Response to an Emergency Training for 211 Staff in Ontario Updated September
Blackboard Learn 9.1 Communicating with Students © 2010 Blackboard Inc. All rights reserved.
EMPOWERMENT THROUGH EDUCATION Business Retention and Expansion Task Force Workshop Joe Lucente Assistant Professor and Extension Educator OSU Extension.
Life in the Atacama, Design Review, December 19, 2003 Carnegie Mellon Life in the Atacama Field Experiments 2004 David Wettergreen The Robotics Institute.
First Aid & Survival Skills
Mission Planning Life in the Atacama 2004 Science & Technology Workshop Paul Tompkins Carnegie Mellon.
Training Workshop on Business Process Analysis in International Trade Joint Workshop on Trade Facilitation and the Single Window September 2015,
Mission Planning Concepts
Zoë Cameras: FOV SPI FI Workspace Cams. Zoë Science Cameras Life in the Atacama 2005 Science and Technology Workshop.
Project and Workshop Objectives
WHO.
Navigation Life in the Atacama 2005 Science & Technology Workshop January 6-7, 2005 Dominic Jonak Carnegie Mellon.
Where We Are OVERVIEW Lesson 1: Course Overview
Mission Status Update August 22
Project Introduction Spring 2017.
Webinar Series on Geospatial technology for Disaster Risk Reduction
Examples of AEGIS autonomous pointing refinement.
Data Analysis and Reporting
Presentation transcript:

Remote Operations Methods & Plan Life in the Atacama 2004 Science & Technology Workshop Nathalie A. Cabrol NASA Ames

Life in the Atacama 2004 Workshop1Carnegie Mellon Presentation Outline Remote Operations Methods and Plan  Calendar and Location of Remote Operations  Remote Science Team  Science Team Structure and Theme Groups  Daily Operations  Operating Schedule  Daily Schedule: Group meetings, data interpretation and sequencing for next sol  “Landing” sols  Data priority and mission modes  Science Phases and Templates

Life in the Atacama 2004 Workshop2Carnegie Mellon Calendar and Location of Remote Operations Location of RST: Pittsburgh / CMU Eventscope lab -- ( see Peter’s presentation )

Life in the Atacama 2004 Workshop3Carnegie Mellon Remote Science Team Members

Life in the Atacama 2004 Workshop4Carnegie Mellon Science Team Structure and Theme Groups Project Science Lead Ground-Truth Lead Instrument PIs Lead Science Tools Lead Remote Science Team Lead SOVPE Lead Long-Term Planning Lead Geo Theme Lead Bio Theme Lead Mineralogy Theme Lead Science Documentarian Sci. Tech Support

Life in the Atacama 2004 Workshop5Carnegie Mellon Science Team Roles The RST Lead: remains the same for the duration of an entire phase (e.g., site A, site B). Could be the same for both; Hands the science sequence to the person in charge of the uplink to the rover and is the sole contact between that person and the science team; Link with the Project Science Lead as well; Long-Term Planning (LTP) Lead: could be taken by the same person leading the RST; Makes sure that the science decisions and actions are consistent with the overall project science objective; Actively participate to the science activities. The Science Documentarian: keeps track of the rationale behind every sol’s final plan. Task could be taken by one of the SOVPE team members as it complement the SOVPE study and would free one RST member; Remains the same for the duration of an entire phase. Could be the same for both;

Life in the Atacama 2004 Workshop6Carnegie Mellon Science Team Roles Science Group Theme Leads: Spokespersons for the various theme groups; Can change daily; Makes sure that the priorities of his/her group are represented/advocated during the science meetings; Makes the call if observations have to be cut during sequencing; Convey the group’s priorities to the LTP Lead; Science Team Members: Analyze and interpret data; Define daily rover activities and suggest observations and their priority to their group theme lead; Keep track of requested and returned observations; Prepare reports and science discussions.

Life in the Atacama 2004 Workshop7Carnegie Mellon Daily Operations: Operating Schedules DownlinkDownlink Asmnt Meeting Sci. Team Working Grp RST Meeting: Sol Plan Uplink

Life in the Atacama 2004 Workshop8Carnegie Mellon “Landing” Sols These measurements are acquired once per landing site Data Products: Total Data Volume: 41.5 M Night before “Landing Day”: 1700 take high-resolution panorama. Uplink to RST. Sleep (No night operation) “Landing Day”: rover receives commands at 1100 and begin traverse and science operations

Life in the Atacama 2004 Workshop9Carnegie Mellon Data Priority and Mission Modes If daily operation time allows, more data than total sol bandwidth can be acquired; However, there is a strict restriction on daily data return. Excess data (> 100 MB) can be: - Stored in the rover and weighted against coming sols data acquisition and return; - Stored in the rover and kept for future analysis in the Earth Extreme Environment Mode; Data priority should be clearly specified by the RST on the uplink sequence; Targets should be clearly specified. ( See Coppin et al., for details on methods and tools )

Life in the Atacama 2004 Workshop10Carnegie Mellon Remote Science Phases and Templates Science Phases and Suggestion for Science Ops Templates (red): Landing: panoramas Regional Mapping Science (RMS) Targeted Sampling (TS) Subsurface Trench Activity (STA) Night Science Activity (NSA) Atmospheric Science Activity (ASA) Other to be identified by the RST prior to mission Note: prepare “light” and “heavy” (extra data acquisition) versions of the templates

Life in the Atacama 2004 Workshop11Carnegie Mellon Remote Science Phases and Templates Templates (tabular format) should include: Observations in priority order (from high to low): MER priority code: (0 to 3, 0 being the highest) Instrument name target name and tracking record in dataset (x/y) Expected data product (e.g., 3x1 mosaic, sf: single frame; sc: stereo color) Expected data volume EX: P0: SPI on Humphrey (x/y) 3 x 1 m_sc_ 2MB P0: ….. P1: SPI Sky (az/elev)_ Etc.