The Faculty Athletics Committee Update Friday, December 7, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
UCSC History. UCSC: A brief history 60s University Placement Committee A lot of field trips/interaction with employers.
Advertisements

Division I Institutional Performance Program Andy Louthain Steve Clar.
Athletics Compliance Office Review – Recommendations, Responses and Best Practices Presentation at PAC-12 Meetings December 2013.
1. NCAA Division III Financial Aid Reporting Program and Self-Assessment 2012.
Division I Financial Aid Part II Kris Richardson Alex Smith.
Review of 2015 NCAA Convention Proposals Southeast Region Compliance Seminar November 2014.
 Overview and Virginia Tech Procedures for Reporting October 19, 2010 Virginia Tech Athletics Compliance ***** RULES-EDUCATION *****
Natasha Oakes and Leslie Schuemann. 1. Session Outcomes. 2. Learning Objectives. 3. Compliance Concepts. 4. Resources.
The Faculty Athletics Committee and Faculty Athletics Representative Annual Report – 2014 September 19, 2014.
DIVISION I GOVERNANCE UPDATE Brandy Hataway Kris Richardson 1.
NCAA Bylaw 11 (Conduct and Employment of Athletics Personnel) Concepts.
NETT Recruitment-Admissions Interactive Review Congruence Survey for case study 1 Relationship between recruitment and admissions activity.
Current Status of the SWA within the NCAA Judith Sweet NCAA Senior Vice President for Championships and Education Services/ Senior Woman Administrator.
NCAA Division I Institutional Performance Program
National Association of Division III Athletic Administrators Round Table Topics and Discussion Questions 2006 NCAA Convention.
Oversight of Intercollegiate Athletics At Western Michigan University.
The Camp Audit “Keep your friends close and your auditor closer”
APR Improvement Plans April 2014 Lindsey McDonnell Director of Certification Curriculum National Association for Athletics Compliance.
 The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and.
Compliance and its Cast of Characters ~ Introductory Compliance Concepts for those with Auxiliary Roles Kimberli E. Bowman NCAA Membership Services.
Auburn University Athletics Compliance Program Susan Bazemore Krissy Ellis Bernard Hill Jamie Funk Diana Martin Rich McGlynn David Mines.
Educational Session: NCAA Division I Hot Topics Thursday, January 16, :30 to 11:00 A.M.
Conference USA Head Coaches Responsibility. What’s On Our Agenda Today? Rationale for rule change NCAA Bylaw Triggers of the Rule Promoting an.
The Faculty Athletics Committee Faculty Council December 2014.
Rules Education Camps/Clinics May 20, 2009 Three types of camps and clinics regulated by NCAA legislation: 1. Developmental – Bylaw Institutional.
Goal Areas for Academic Performance Finances Competitive Environment Equity and Diversity Involvement Facilities Development Marketing Sales.
What You Need to Know College Athletics. Tonight’s Agenda:  Provide information about college athletics  Help advise potential athletes and their families.
NCAA Division I Institutional Performance Program 2015 NCAA Regional Rules Seminar Supplement.
Coalition on Intercollegiate Athletics. COIA Steering Committee Joel CohenUniversity of MarylandACC Gary EngstrandUniversity of MinnesotaBig Ten Bob EnoIndiana.
Admissions/Registrars & Athletics: How To Make It Work! Anthony Gallina, Coordinator, Undergraduate Admissions – Oakland University Christopher Goeth,
CENTRAL STATE UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF ATHLETICS Compliance Policies/Procedures Review & New Academic Year Changes Devrance M. Fisher, Compliance Officer.
NCAA Division III Compliance Concepts NCAA Division III Compliance Concepts2014.
The Faculty Athletics Committee Annual Report November 15, 2013.
Student-Athlete and NCAA Rules Information for New Faculty.
Committee on Intercollegiate Athletics Report to the University Senate March 6, 2007.
Michigan State University Athletic Council Report January 27, 2015.
Principle 17 Assessment. January, 2009 A model Division II athletics program shall feature a tool that is used as a written assessment each year to measure.
A model Division II athletics program shall feature an environment where head coaches understand their responsibility in establishing a culture of compliance.
Principle 6 Coach’s Role. January, 2009 A model Division II athletics program shall feature an environment where head coaches understand their responsibility.
NCAA Athletics Certification Orientation. Overview Origin, Purpose and Benefits. Athletics Certification Process. Operating Principles. Measurable Standards.
On-line briefing for Program Directors and Staff 1.
GOVERNOR’S EARLY CHILDHOOD ADVISORY COUNCIL (ECAC) September 9, 2014.
September 7, 2012 Academics, Athletics, Faculty Athletics Committee.
Academics, Athletics, Faculty Athletics Committee Hunter Rawlings Panel Discussion.
Principle 4 FAR Involvement. January, 2009 A model Division II Member institution shall include the active involvement of the faculty athletics representative.
UNCW Compliance 3/9/2015. Sports Wagering NCAA Bylaw 10.3 Sports Wagering Activities The following individuals shall not knowingly participate in sports.
NCAA Working Group on the Collegiate Model – Rules Overview March 2012.
1 Faculty Athletics Task Force: Subcommittee of Student Life Bruce Oppenheimer Stokes Peebles, chair Doug Perkins Virginia Shepherd Sharon Shields Marshall.
University Senate October 7, University Senate October 7, 2015 Summary Presidential Briefing President Loh provided a briefing on two suggested.
o Anticipated timeline. o Summary of the feedback thus far. o Examples of a few concepts. o Key points. o Successful Outcomes. page 3.
Steve Chen & William Salazar. Morehead State University 2009 AAHPERD Convention Tampa, Florida NCAA 101: Institutional Control and Academic Integrity for.
Dr. Abdel-Rahman Al-Qawasmi Associate Professor Electrical Engineering Department (15\10\2015)
SPC Advisory Committee Training - TAC Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office 1 Abridged from the SPC Advisory Committee Training on October.
SPC Advisory Committee Training Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office SPC 10/9/20151.
2015 Report of the Faculty Athletics Representative Lissa L. Broome Wells Fargo Professor of Banking Law.
Accreditation Overview Winter 2016 Mallory Newell, Accreditation Liaison Office.
The Faculty Athletics Committee Update Friday, March 8, 2013.
Processing Level I and II Violations 2013 Regional Rules Seminars Laura McNab and Mike Zonder NCAA Enforcement Staff.
Evaluator Training Workshop March 1, 2012 Jeff Jordan Vice President for Student Life Seattle Pacific University.
November | 1 CONTINUING CARE COUNCIL Report to Forum Year
NCAA Athletics Certification Orientation. Purpose and Benefits.
Making an Excellent School More Excellent: Weston High School’s 21st Century Learning Expectations and Goals
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Training for Faculty
Taught Postgraduate Program Review
Elite Student-Athlete Education
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Training for Faculty
2010 Regional Rules Seminar
Principle 4: FAR Involvement
Taught Postgraduate Program Review
Fort Valley State University
Presentation transcript:

The Faculty Athletics Committee Update Friday, December 7, 2012

Year Plan – presented in September Topic Experts Team Liaisons Topics – Reviewed and/or monitored – Student Athlete Experience – Admissions – Academics – Advising – Academic Support – Policies and Procedures – Operations

October – Student Athlete Experience (N= 72), (N=59), and this year (N=46) In , there were a total of 123 senior student athletes; therefore the overall response rate was 37% Overall Summary: In general, senior student athletes who completed the exit surveys in rated both the athletic and academic experiences at UNC quite favorably. It is likely that many of the significant differences reported between revenue and non-revenue sport student athletes are the lingering effects of the NCAA investigation and sanctions, and the heightened national and local press associated with the football and athletics program. In spite of these stressors, senior student athletes were generally quite favorable about their time and experiences at UNC.

November – Student Athlete Experience Moving Forward Surveys distributed and collected and input by athletics; analyzed by FAC and discussed; actions, if indicated, sent to the appropriate body; FAC with Athletics conducted group interviews with exiting seniors Odum Institute involvement with instrument design and training Process changes – Still both written and oral exit data from seniors – FAC discussions with SAAC

November – Team Liaison Role Communicating with the coaching staff of the team to discuss the student-athlete experience at UNC from recruitment through graduation; Meeting with the team so that the student-athletes know that the faculty and the FAC are interested in learning more about their commitments as student-athletes; Contacting ASPSA counselors and academic advisors assigned to their team to learn about any policies, processes, or support that might be needed; and Representing the team in FAC discussions regarding the special needs of the sport.

December - Admissions Discussions with and from – Steve Farmer from UGA – Layna Mosley and Beverly Foster, FAC topic experts

January – Admissions Moving Forward Questions raised by FAC and other faculty members related to admissions and answered Outside input from peer institutions Considerations for year end suggestions and recommmendations

Advising, Academics, Academic Support Suggestions, Support, Recommendations, Requests that integrate all things academics and athletics from a well-informed Committee who has reviewed current practices and policies at UNC with additional support information from outside UNC

Conversations, Input, Discussions Connections – between many groups/committees related to athletics Understanding – interrelationship of concerns and issues and successes Informed discussion – FAC process

Conversations, Input, Discussions Input from faculty members: The ARG requests that the University strike the terms "student-athlete" and "collegiate model of sport" from its lexicon. Abundant evidence shows, and former NCAA president Walter Byers has admitted with regard to "student- athlete," that these are intellectually dishonest terms invented for the purpose of preserving an amateur ideal that protects the NCAA's financial interests. There is no reason for UNC to use such morally compromised language with regard to its own activities. "UNC athletes" and "UNC students" are sufficient categories. 2.

Conversations, Input, Discussions The ARG requests that the athletics department explain what it regards as "countable hours" of sport- related activity for its sport teams. We need to have accurate measures, and accurate measuring instruments, to determine the kinds of balances our athletes strike in their schedules.

Conversations, Input, Discussions The ARG requests that the FAC propose (if not already policy) that, in the future, eligibility for membership on the FAC be restricted to faculty who teach undergraduates on some regular basis. Many of the issues that arise from student involvement in athletics are understood well only by those who teach undergraduates and manage undergraduate classrooms.

Thank you for all your input and support