MRPO Technical Approach “Nearer” Term Overview For: Emissions Modeling Meteorological Modeling Photochemical Modeling & Domain Model Performance Evaluation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
POMI Po Valley Model Intercomparison Exercise CAMx model overview In cooperation with AMA - MI.
Advertisements

VISTAS Modeling Overview May 25, 2004 Mt. Cammerer, Great Smoky Mtns. National Park.
Template Development and Testing of PinG and VBS modules in CMAQ 5.01 Prakash Karamchandani, Bonyoung Koo, Greg Yarwood and Jeremiah Johnson ENVIRON International.
Photochemical Model Performance for PM2.5 Sulfate, Nitrate, Ammonium, and pre-cursor species SO2, HNO3, and NH3 at Background Monitor Locations in the.
Ozone Modeling over the Western U.S. -- Impact of National Controls on Ozone Trends in the Future Rural/Urban Ozone in the Western United States -- March.
Three-State Air Quality Study (3SAQS) Three-State Data Warehouse (3SDW) 3SAQS Technical Scope of Work: Tom Moore, WESTAR/WRAP on behalf of University.
Christian Seigneur AER San Ramon, CA
CENRAP Modeling Workgroup Mational RPO Modeling Meeting May 25-26, Denver CO Calvin Ku Missouri DNR May 25, 2004.
Effects of climate change on future wildfire and its impact on regional air quality Hyun Cheol Kim, Dae-Gyun Lee, and Daewon Byun 1 Institute for Multidimensional.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Carolina Environmental Programs Emissions and meteorological Aspects of the 2001 ICAP Simulation Adel Hanna,
Session 9, Unit 17 UAM and CAMx. UAM and CAMx UAM - Urban Airshed Model Currently available versions:  UAM-V 1.24  UAM-V 1.30  Available from Systems.
CMAQ (Community Multiscale Air Quality) pollutant Concentration change horizontal advection vertical advection horizontal dispersion vertical diffusion.
Template CAMx Ancillary Input Development Chris Emery ENVIRON International Corporation, Novato CA November 14, 2012.
Emission processing methodology for the new GEM-MACH model ABSTRACT SMOKE has recently been adapted to provide emissions for the new Meteorological Service.
Beta Testing of the SCICHEM-2012 Reactive Plume Model James T. Kelly and Kirk R. Baker Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards US Environmental Protection.
©2005,2006 Carolina Environmental Program Sparse Matrix Operator Kernel Emissions SMOKE Modeling System Zac Adelman and Andy Holland Carolina Environmental.
University of California Riverside, ENVIRON Corporation, MCNC WRAP Regional Modeling Center WRAP Regional Haze CMAQ 1996 Model Performance and for Section.
2004 Workplan WRAP Regional Modeling Center Prepared by: Gail Tonnesen, University of California Riverside Ralph Morris, ENVIRON Corporation Zac Adelman,
WRAP Update. Projects Updated 1996 emissions QA procedures New evaluation tools Model updates CB-IV km MM5 Fugitive dust NH 3 emissions Model.
The Impact of Biogenic VOC Emissions on Tropospheric Ozone Formation in the Mid-Atlantic Region Michelle L. Bell Yale University Hugh Ellis Johns Hopkins.
1 Recent Advances in the Modeling of Airborne Substances George Pouliot Shan He Tom Pierce.
Implementation of the Particle & Precursor Tagging Methodology (PPTM) for the CMAQ Modeling System: Mercury Tagging 5 th Annual CMAS Conference Research.
Presents:/slides/greg/PSAT_ ppt Effects of Sectional PM Distribution on PM Modeling in the Western US Ralph Morris and Bonyoung Koo ENVIRON International.
1 Using Hemispheric-CMAQ to Provide Initial and Boundary Conditions for Regional Modeling Joshua S. Fu 1, Xinyi Dong 1, Kan Huang 1, and Carey Jang 2 1.
Community Multiscale Air Quality Modeling System CMAQ Air Quality Data Summit February 2008.
Ozone MPE, TAF Meeting, July 30, 2008 Review of Ozone Performance in WRAP Modeling and Relevance to Future Regional Ozone Planning Gail Tonnesen, Zion.
Georgia Environmental Protection Division Uncertainty Analysis of Ozone Formation and Emission Control Responses using High-order Sensitivities Di Tian,
1 CCOS Update November 3, 2006 PC Meeting Project Status –Completed Projects Results –On-Going Projects Status Plan for CCOS Final Phase –Guiding Principles.
Presentation by: Dan Goldberg Co-authors: Tim Vinciguerra, Linda Hembeck, Sam Carpenter, Tim Canty, Ross Salawitch & Russ Dickerson 13 th Annual CMAS Conference.
Annual Simulations of Models-3/CMAQ: Issues and Lessons Learned Pat Dolwick, Carey Jang, Norm Possiel, Brian Timin, Joe Tikvart Air Quality Modeling Group.
WRAP Regional Modeling Center April 25-26, 2006 AoH Work Group Meeting Regional Modeling Center Status Report AoH Workgroup Meeting Seattle, WA April 25-26,
Utah Wintertime PM2.5 Modeling Lance Avey Utah Division of Air Quality.
Preliminary Study: Direct and Emission-Induced Effects of Global Climate Change on Regional Ozone and Fine Particulate Matter K. Manomaiphiboon 1 *, A.
VISTAS Emissions Inventory Overview Nov 4, VISTAS is evaluating visibility and sources of fine particulate mass in the Southeastern US View NE from.
PM Model Performance & Grid Resolution Kirk Baker Midwest Regional Planning Organization November 2003.
October 6, 2015 Alison Eyth, Rich Mason (EPA OAQPS EIAG*) Alexis Zubrow (Volpe, DOT) * Emission Inventory and Analysis Group.
Role of Air Quality Modeling in the RIA Norm Possiel & Pat Dolwick Air Quality Modeling Group EPA/OAQPS.
Source Attribution Modeling to Identify Sources of Regional Haze in Western U.S. Class I Areas Gail Tonnesen, EPA Region 8 Pat Brewer, National Park Service.
Evaluation of the VISTAS 2002 CMAQ/CAMx Annual Simulations T. W. Tesche & Dennis McNally -- Alpine Geophysics, LLC Ralph Morris -- ENVIRON Gail Tonnesen.
1 Impact on Ozone Prediction at a Fine Grid Resolution: An Examination of Nudging Analysis and PBL Schemes in Meteorological Model Yunhee Kim, Joshua S.
GEOS-CHEM Modeling for Boundary Conditions and Natural Background James W. Boylan Georgia Department of Natural Resources - VISTAS National RPO Modeling.
Three-State Air Quality Study (3SAQS) Three-State Data Warehouse (3SDW) 3SAQS/3SDW Progress Review to the 3SAQS Technical Committee University of North.
Analysis of Ozone Modeling for May – July 2006 in PNW using AIRPACT3 (CMAQ) and CAMx. Robert Kotchenruther, Ph.D. EPA Region 10 Nov CMAQ O 3 Prediction.
1 MANE-VU Modeling Plans Inter-RPO Modeling Meeting May 25, 2004 Shan He, Emily Savelli, Jung-Hun Woo, John Graham and Gary Kleiman, NESCAUM.
Diagnostic Study on Fine Particulate Matter Predictions of CMAQ in the Southeastern U.S. Ping Liu and Yang Zhang North Carolina State University, Raleigh,
THE MODELS-3 COMMUNITY MULTI- SCALE AIR QUALITY (CMAQ) MODEL: 2002 RELEASE – NEW FEATURES Jonathan Pleim, Francis Binkowski, Robin Dennis, Brian Eder,
DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATION OF MADRID: A NEW AEROSOL MODULE IN MODELS-3/CMAQ Yang Zhang*, Betty Pun, Krish Vijayaraghavan, Shiang-Yuh Wu and Christian.
Peak 8-hr Ozone Model Performance when using Biogenic VOC estimated by MEGAN and BIOME (BEIS) Kirk Baker Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium October.
1 RAQMS-CMAQ Atmospheric Chemistry Model Data for the TexAQS-II Period : Focus on BCs impacts on air quality simulations Daewon Byun 1, Daegyun Lee 1,
Operational Evaluation and Model Response Comparison of CAMx and CMAQ for Ozone & PM2.5 Kirk Baker, Brian Timin, Sharon Phillips U.S. Environmental Protection.
VISTAS Modeling Overview Oct. 29, 2003
Air Quality Modeling of PM2.5 Species Kirk Baker Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium & Midwest RPO 10/21/2002.
Evaluation of CAMx: Issues Related to Sectional Models Ralph Morris, Bonyoung Koo, Steve Lau and Greg Yarwood ENVIRON International Corporation Novato,
A Comparison Study of CMAQ Aerosol Prediction by Two Thermodynamic Modules: UHAERO V.S. ISORROPIA Case study for January 2002 episode Fang-Yi Cheng 1,
Impacts of Meteorological Variations on RRFs (Relative Response Factors) in the Demonstration of Attainment of the National Ambient Air Quality for 8-hr.
Overview of Future Year Emissions Processing for CMAQ Modeling Urban, Regional Modeling and Analysis Section Division of Air Resources New York State Department.
Sensitivity of PM 2.5 Species to Emissions in the Southeast Sun-Kyoung Park and Armistead G. Russell Georgia Institute of Technology Sensitivity of PM.
Although this work was reviewed by EPA and approved for publication, it may not necessarily reflect official Agency policy Jonathan Pleim, Shawn Roselle,
1 REMSAD VERSION 7.10 WITH SOURCE TAGGING Inter-RPO Modeling Meeting May 25, 2004 Shan He, Emily Savelli, Jung-Hun Woo, John Graham and Gary Kleiman, NESCAUM.
Western Regional Technical Projects 2011 through 2013
Mobile Source Contributions to Ambient PM2.5 and Ozone in 2025
SEMAP 2017 Ozone Projections and Sensitivities / Contributions Prepared by: Talat Odman - Georgia Tech Yongtao Hu - Georgia Tech Jim Boylan - Georgia.
MANE-VU Emissions Inventory Update
2017 Projections and Interstate Transport of Ozone in Southeastern US Talat Odman & Yongtao Hu - Georgia Tech Jim Boylan - Georgia EPD 16th Annual.
Photochemical Model Performance and Consistency
Overview of WRAP 2014 Platform develop and Shake-Out project update
7th Annual CMAS Conference
CMAQ model as a tool for generating input data for HM and POP modeling
Diagnostic and Operational Evaluation of 2002 and 2005 Estimated 8-hr Ozone to Support Model Attainment Demonstrations Kirk Baker Donna Kenski Lake Michigan.
Emissions Discussion Group November 6, 2003
Presentation transcript:

MRPO Technical Approach “Nearer” Term Overview For: Emissions Modeling Meteorological Modeling Photochemical Modeling & Domain Model Performance Evaluation Regulatory Support These approaches are dynamic and will change as emissions, met, chemistry, and deposition processes evolve and hopefully improve

Emissions Currently 1999 NEI v2 MOBILE6 BEIS3/BIOME3* CMU Ammonia 1995 Canadian anthropogenic Moving Toward 2002 Emissions submitted from the States MOBILE6** BEIS3/BIOME3* CMU Ammonia Newer Canadian Inventory *Day Specific**Day Specific for Summer Months

MM5 Current Setup Explicit Moisture: Simple ice PBL: Pleim-Xiu Multi-Layer Soil Model: Pleim-Xiu Radiation: RRTM Cumulus: Kain-Fritsch 4-D Data Assimilation: Analysis nudging on; only above PBL Future Obtain annual 2002 simulation using latest version of MM5 and with water phase mixing ratios explicitly output Obtain EPA annual 2001 simulation

Other Model Inputs Initial and Boundary conditions: –Currently: profile (v6) released with CMAQ –Switching to GEOS-CHEM output when available –Simulations spin up 2 weeks to minimize impact Landuse (11 categories): –USGS landuse Ozone Column: –Daily TOMS ozone column data Albedo: –Monthly albedo based on 10 years of TOMS reflectivity data Photolysis Rates: –TUV4.0 processor using the discrete ordinate algorithm; –daily rates files based on daily O3 column and monthly albedo

CAMx4 CB4 gas-phase chemistry Semi-volatile secondary organic aerosol module ISORROPIA thermodynamics module PPM horizontal transport, implicit vertical transport RADM based aqueous phase chemistry (same as CMAQ) Sub-grid plume treatment: TBD Platform –RedHat Linux PCs –Portland Group Fortran Compiler *Plan to apply CMAQ and REMSAD to specific episodes as a QA step

MM5 Domain (light yellow) –165 X, 129 Y, 35 Z –36 km cells CAMx Domain (dark yellow) –97 X, 90 Y, 14 Z –36 km cells Lambert projection –Center (-97,40) –True latitudes (33,45)

Model Performance IMPROVE –24 hr samples every 3 days –PM2.5 Speciation Super Sites & Special Studies –Hourly gases and meteorology –Hourly/daily PM2.5 Speciation EPA Speciation –24 hr samples every 3 days –PM2.5 Speciation March Midwest –daily 24 hr samples –PM2.5 Speciation –NH3, HNO3, HNO2, SO2 AIRS -- not shown –Hourly criteria pollutants TDL U.S. Airways – not shown –Hourly meteorological data

1. Biogenics 2. Other Area 3. Point 4. Nonroad 5. Onroad 6. Ammonia Source Apportionment Focusing on source apportionment runs to support strategy development De-emphasizing VOC, NOX, SO2, NH3 “generalized” emissions adjustments

Summary Transition this year from 1999 to 2002 based anthropogenic emissions Continue to use our 2002 MM5 36km simulation; may seek an updated 2002 MM5 36km run from another RPO Continual model performance for 2002 and other select episodes as emissions and meteorology change Iterative modeling process: continually updating emissions, met, and photochemical modeling until we essentially “run out of time” for SIP Strategy formulation process will be supported with source apportionment modeling rather than zero out runs or across the board emissions adjustments

Continental Domain v. Eastern Domain

15km Top v 6km Top