1 Customer Objections in Complete Status (CCO Clean-up Phase 3) Background Next Steps.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Market True-Up Discussion RMS Meeting 03/13/02 Draft Only for Discussion Purposes.
Advertisements

Retail Market Subcommittee Update to TAC February 5, 2004.
Inadvertent Gain Overview February Introduction Why we are here –Original Inadvertent Gain (IAG) Task Force (2004) Creation of Retail Market.
1.  An inadvertent issue begins upon the discovery of an Inadvertent Gain or Move-In transaction submission. Upon identification of an Inadvertent Gain.
1 Pre-TX Set 1.5 Data Clean Up. 2 Pre-TX SET 1.5 Data Clean-up Process In-Review - currently 12 (Original Quantity = 863) –June RMS, count 207 In-Review.
Retail Market Update June 5, New meter is requested for a specific customer’s location. 2.Application is filed by customer and/or the customer’s.
1 Update to RMS February 03, January Meeting Update RMGRR126, Additional ERCOT Validations for Customer Billing Contact Information File RMGRR128,Reinstate.
Role of Account Management at ERCOT PRR 672 Collaborative Analysis Presentation to RMS November 8, 2006 DRAFT ONLY.
1 LSE Certification Process ERCOT August 23, 2006.
ERCOT MARKET EDUCATION
1 Transaction or Issue Clean Up. 2 Linked-Address Issue Multiple ESI IDs Linked to a Single Service Address Record Background Counts Matrix Completed.
RMS Update to TAC January 3, Goals Update ► Complete and improve SCR745, Retail Market Outage Evaluation & Resolution, implementation and reporting.
RMSUpdate November 4, 2004 Retail Market Subcommittee Update to TAC.
1 MIMO/Stacking (Including Tx SET Version 2.0) Post Implementation Success Report.
Profiling Working Group August 2, PWG Update Report By Ernie Podraza of Reliant Energy ERCOT PWG Chair for COPS Meeting August 22, 2006.
1 RMS Task Force on Retail Market Customer/ESI Transition October 16, 2003.
1 RMS Update - ERCOT June 10, Supporting Reports Section.
1 RMS Update on Move-In / Move-Out Task Force October 16, 2002.
Market Impact Assessment TF Final Report to RMS June 11, 2008.
Retail Market Subcommittee June 9, 2010 Performance Measures 1st Quarter 2010 Transaction Comparison.
Update to RMS September 1 st, RMGRR129 – Revision to Customer Rescission Completion Timeline Timely execution of a customer rescission after completion.
09/15/10 RMS RMS Market Reports – Recommendations Karen Farley Manager, Retail Customer Choice.
Flight V1.4F2 TTPT Update to RMS May 1. Participants of Flight V1.4F2 5 CRs 3 New CRs Andeler Constellation UBS Warburg 2 Existing CRs Electric America.
Rob Connell May 1, 2002 Retail Sub-Committee Update.
1 Supporting materials for RMS Recommendations for improvements from EDIM team (ESI ID Data Integrity Management team)
Texas Test Plan Team Market Testing Update to RMS October 16, 2002.
1 Supporting materials for RMS Provided by Retail Customer Choice (RCC) team.
Market Coordination Team Update Retail Market Subcommittee November 8, 2006 Susan Munson Retail Market Liaison.
10/13/10 RMS RMS Market Reports – Recommendations Karen Farley Manager, Retail Customer Choice.
ESI IDs Retired in Error! RMS – August 10, 2005 Discussion.
RMS Update to TAC April 7, RMS Voting Items  RMGRR032- Transaction Timing Matrix Corrections Includes updates to Appendix D to correct examples.
TX SET v2.1 Implementation Plan. Table of Contents A.Shut Down Procedure B.Shut Down Timeline Details C.Conference Calls D.Additional Contingencies.
Report to RMS January 14, TTPT Key Dates and Deadlines as of 1/14/03 1/05/04 - Mandatory Connectivity Kick Off Call & Penny Tests begin 1/12/03.
1 RMS Update - ERCOT May 14, Supporting Reports Section.
October 9, 2012 Commercial Operations Subcommittee RMS Update Kathy Scott RMS Vice Chair.
Retail Market Subcommittee Update to COPS Kathy Scott March 17,
1 RMS Update on Move-In / Move-Out Task Force November 14, 2002.
1 Transaction or Issue Clean Up. 2 Linked-Address Issue Multiple ESI IDs Linked to a Single Service Address Record Background Counts Matrix Completed.
1 Linked-Service Address Discussion Thursday - April 8, 2004 (Updated 4/12/04 to include meeting results) Airport Hilton - Austin.
1 Update on the 867_03 Contingency Plan Nancy Hetrick February 25, 2003.
1 Transaction or Issue Clean Up. 2 Customer Protection and 814_08 Issue (Phase 2 – Potentially Late 08s) Background Completed Items Next Steps.
814_20 – Substation ID updates Background and Proposed Action Plan RMS – 11/07/07.
1 Supporting materials for RMS Provided by Retail Customer Choice (RCC) team.
1 TX SET Update to RMS November 12, RMGRR Activity RMGRR065 – Disconnect and Reconnect for Non-Payment Updates and Corrections – –Normal Timeline.
1 RMS Update By Don Bender January 9, RMS Approved Resolution Upon TAC approval, suspend further True-up settlements for True-up resettlement.
Update to RMS August 4th, RMGRR129 – Revision to Customer Rescission Completion Timeline Timely execution of a customer rescission after completion.
Long Term Move-In Move-Out Development Strategy August 19, 2002 DRAFT.
Issue 2007-I071 Modify Cancellation Window to Accept Cancels Closer to SMRD.
1 TX SET Mass Transition Project RMS Update March 15, 2006.
Update to RMS December 18, Project(PR) 010_03 SCR756 Part B – High Level Timeline DRAFT:  Planning Phase: ~ (End of 2013) ◦ Business requirements.
1 Update from ERCOT Retail Market Services to RMS July 17, 2003.
Update to RMS January 10, Project(PR) 010_03 SCR756 Part B – High Level Timeline DRAFT:  Planning Phase: ~ (End of 2013) ◦ Business requirements.
1 Move-In Move-Out Task Force Update to RMS May 15, 2003.
Retail Market Subcommittee Update to TAC March 4, 2004.
MIMO Stacking Document and the current RMG are inconsistent with current logic and should be updated.
Update to RMS October 6 th, RMGRR129 – Revision to Customer Rescission Completion Timeline – REMINDER Timely execution of a customer rescission.
1 Update from ERCOT Retail Market Services to RMS August 14, 2003.
RMGRR058 Overview RMS Meeting – August 15, Background / Reference PUCT Substantive Rule 25.43(n)(8) Protocol Customer Billing Contact.
Mass Transition Lessons Learned. Should the FASD (First Available Switch Date) be revised for Mass Transition Projects? We need a better definition of.
MMWG Performance Measures Questionnaire. Performance Measure Reporting Requirements The reporting requirements allowed the commission to obtain information.
1 Customer Objections in Complete Status (CCO Clean-up Phase 3) Background Next Steps.
Summary of the November 11, 2002 Market Synchronization “How-to-Fix” Decisions For presentation to RMS November 14, 2002.
Mass Transition—Timelines & Volume Limitation RMGRR116—Acquisition Transfer Non-standard Metering Future Meetings 1.
1 Market Participant Default Joint Taskforce Update and Report on Recent Customer Transition Activity Report to WMS August 17, 2005.
Multiple ESI IDs Linked to a Single Service Address Record Linked-Address Action Items.
1 Supporting materials for RMS Provided by Retail Customer Choice (RCC) team.
1 Transaction or Issue Clean Up. 2 Customer Protection and 814_08 Issue (Phase 2 – Potentially Late 08s) Background Completed Items Next Steps.
Retail Market Subcommittee Update to COPS Kathy Scott January 14,
Pro-Active Transaction Resolution Measures
Pro-Active Transaction Resolution Measures
Presentation transcript:

1 Customer Objections in Complete Status (CCO Clean-up Phase 3) Background Next Steps

2 Background While reviewing internal monitoring ERCOT has associated with the customer objection process, 260 Switches (in 2003, 2004) have been identified where ERCOT received a customer objection request from our call center, but the Order shows as ‘Complete’ in ERCOT’s system. None of these instances relate to 2003’s RMS-approved CCO Cleanup projects (phase 1 or phase 2). 192 appear to be where ERCOT failed to successfully process the 814_08 for the customer care objection. 68 are instances where the TDSP completed switches prior to the end of the customer protection period. – It should be noted that there are many more examples of protected switches being completed prematurely by the TDSPs (i.e. prior to the end of the customer protection period), and these 68 are specifically only that subset where ERCOT had received a customer care objection (that then failed to process successfully). Customer Objections in Complete Status

3 Action Plan from 10/27/04 TX SET-PUCT Meeting 1.ERCOT will send out list of ESI IDs to affected CRs. This list will only include those ESI IDs where there has not been a Move-In, Move-Out, or Switch completed since the switch in question. (Reduces number from 260 to 120 with 13 CRs involved) The list will include two tabs for each impacted CR – one where the CR was the ‘gaining CR’ and one where the CR was the ‘losing CR’. These lists are intended to be outbound notification only – the CRs are NOT expected to update and return the list to ERCOT. (Completed 10/29/04) 2.ERCOT will initiate Inadvertent Gain FasTraks on all ESI IDs included in the lists to the CRs and will update CRs and the related TDSPs with FasTrak numbers. (Completed 11/4/04) 3.Gaining CR will call their customers associated with the ESI IDs which are listed on the “gaining CR” tab and explain the situation. They will find out if the customer would like to stay with the gaining CR or go back to the losing CR. If the gaining CR cannot contact the customer, the PUCT has directed that the CR must contact the PUCT (Lauren Damen, or ) to let them know of the situation. The PUCT will decide how these situations will be handled in a one off basis. Customer Objections in Complete Status

4 Action Plan from 10/27/04 TX SET-PUCT Meeting (Continued) 4.Gaining CR will update FasTrak issue associated with each ESI ID. There are three updates possible: a.Customer is satisfied with current CR and does not wish to be switched. No action necessary. b.Customer wishes to return to previous CR. Both CRs involved need to work together to decide when and how the customer will be returned to the losing CR. (Note: it was suggested at TX SET that the most appropriate remedy in these cases would be for ERCOT to send the missing 814_08’s on the inadvertently completed switch and have the market participants and ERCOT manually correct their records to show the gaining CR did not start serving the ESI ID as a result of the switch). c.Gaining CR was not able to contact customer. Gaining CR will contact the PUCT and will provide further update when the PUCT has given direction. Customer Objections in Complete Status

5 Completed Items 10/11/04 – ERCOT supplied information to TX SET regarding the CCO issues 10/20/04 – ERCOT released issue data and an ERCOT proposal on the Retail Market Call 10/25/04 – At Retail Market Call, MP requested face-to-face meeting to finalize a clean-up action plan 10/27/04 – Texas Set and PUCT held meeting to determine a course of action for the clean- up (see Action Plan on previous slides) 10/29/04 – ERCOT sent lists and notice of clean-up activities to affected CRs 11/4/04 – ERCOT completed submission of ERCOT Initiated “Inadvertent” FasTrak issues on the 120 switches included in the clean-up activity. Additionally ERCOT sent revised list, including FasTrak IDs, to both CRs and TDSPs 11/11/04 – ERCOT identified 3 additional instances, initiated FasTrak issues and notifications to CRs and TDSPs 11/18/04 – ERCOT sent TDSPs lists of 327Service Orders from 2004 that completed prior to the end of the CCO period (these lists include all instances of TDSP completing early in 2004 and not just those where the customer requested a cancellation) Customer Objections in Complete Status

6

7 Outstanding Action Items CRs to review FasTrak issues and provide updates in accordance with Action Plan CRs to coordinate any corrective actions with ERCOT and the TDSP TX SET to further discuss potential validation for TDSP completions prior to end of Customer Protection Period ERCOT to report FasTrak issue completion at subsequent RMS meetings Customer Objections in Complete Status