ANNUAL AND FINAL PERFORMANCE REPORTS 524B FORM REPORTING PERIOD BUDGET EXPENDITURES INDIRECT COST RATE PERFORMANCE MEASURES.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tuesday, December 14, 2010 BUREAU OF INDIAN EDUCATION Division of Performance and Accountability Special Education Program.
Advertisements

Final Determinations. Secretary’s Determinations Secretary annually reviews the APR and, based on the information provided in the report, information.
Sam Lopez, NPD Program Manager, OELA
Step by Step Process. Checklist and Form Instructions A checklist is provided on the website to help applicants track their progress in completing the.
Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education With thanks to NECTAC & Christy Kavulic GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING.
Title III National Professional Development (NPD) Program Grantee Performance Reporting: A Webinar for FY2011 and FY2012 Grantees February 28, 2013 Prepared.
Work Session 3 Performance Indicators Measures Office of Research, Evaluation and Policy Studies Ximena D. Burgin, Ed.D. January 25 th, 2011.
1 Program Performance and Evaluation: Policymaker Expectations 2009 International Education Programs Service Technical Assistance Workshop Eleanor Briscoe.
Trini Torres-Carrion. AGENDA Overview of ED 524B Resources Q&A.
How to Develop a Project Evaluation Plan Pat Gonzalez Office of Special Education Programs
Tennessee Department of Education Compliance Training February 2012 Department of Exceptional Children.
325K: Combined Priority for Personnel Preparation Webinar on the Annual Performance Report for Continuation Funding Office of Special Education Programs.
325D Preparation of Leadership Personnel Webinar on the Annual Performance Report for Continuation Funding Presenter: Patricia Gonzalez, Ph.D. Office.
Pat Mueller David Merves October 6, 2008 NH RESPONDS Evaluation Component.
Final Reports, No-Cost Extensions and Close Outs FY06 ERCM Final Grantee Meeting August 4, 2007, Washington, DC U.S. Department of Education, Office of.
Overview of the SPDG Competition Jennifer Doolittle, Ph.D. 1.
2011 SIGnetwork Regional Meetings Professional Development: the heart of the matter.
1 OSEP Project Directors’ Conference April 28 th, 2015.
12/07/20101 Bidder’s Conference Call: ARRA Early On ® Electronic Enhancement to Individualized Family Service Plans (EE-IFSP) Grant and Climb to the Top.
HECSE Quality Indicators for Leadership Preparation.
National Consortium On Deaf-Blindness Families Technical Assistance Information Services and Dissemination Personnel Training State Projects.
Perkins Technical Assistance Webinar January 15, 2014 Oregon Department of Education | Department of Community Colleges and Workforce Development.
July 20, 2009 Karen Schroll, Westat.  You must complete ALL of OSEP’s reporting requirements.  The OSEP PPD data collection is in the Fall/Winter. 
1 SPDG Jennifer Coffey 323A State Personnel Development Grants SPDG Webinar on Grant Performance Report for Continuation Funding Jennifer Coffey Office.
Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING FY 2009.
Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING FY 2011.
1 Charting the Course: Smoother Data Sharing for Effective Early Childhood Transition Wisconsin’s Journey Lori Wittemann, Wisconsin Department of Health.
SPDG Performance Measure Discussion Monday, March 14 th 2011.
ANNUAL AND FINAL PERFORMANCE REPORTS 524B FORM REPORTING PERIOD BUDGET EXPENDITURES INDIRECT COST RATE PERFORMANCE MEASURES.
2011 SIGnetwork Regional Meetings Professional Development: the heart of the matter.
0 Personnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities PERFORMANCE MEASURES Craig Stanton Office of Planning, Evaluation,
SIG Day 2009 Jennifer Doolittle OSEP July 20, 2009.
Instructional Accommodations/ Modifications in Cypress-Fairbanks ISD Teacher Implementation Guide.
NOTES FROM INFORMATIONAL BRIEFINGS FOR POTENTIAL REGIONAL CENTER AND CONTENT CENTER APPLICANTS JUNE 19,20 & 22, 2012 Comprehensive Centers Program.
Using Individual Project and Program Evaluations to Improve the Part D Programs Dr. Herbert M. Baum.
Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING.
Petraine Johnson, Moderator, Presenters: Millie Bentley-Memon, Fengju Zhang, Elizabeth Judd Office of English Language Acquisition Language Enhancement.
Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING.
New Indicator 14 Frequently Asked Questions Frequently Asked Questions 3 rd Annual Secondary Transition State Planning Institute Charlotte, NC May12-14,
Welcome to the San Francisco Mathematics and Science Partnerships Regional Meeting March 21-23, 2011.
Project Design Jennifer Coffey OSEP May 4,
Tuesday, April 24, 2012 BUREAU OF INDIAN EDUCATION Division of Performance and Accountability Special Education Program 1.
OSEP Project Directors’ Conference Managing Your Grants 101 Terry Jackson – OSEP Shedeh Hajghassemali – OSEP July 22, 2008.
Tuesday, March 29 th 2011 SPDG Performance Measure Discussion.
WELCOME!  The Physical Education Teacher Hire/ Professional Development Grant Application Webinar will begin in a few minutes!
Tuesday, April 12 th 2011 SPDG Performance Measure Discussion.
Title III Native American and Alaska Native Children in School Program Grantee Performance Reporting June 19, 2014 Prepared under the Data Quality Initiative.
Harold Gomes Statistician Office of Migrant Education U.S. Department of Education Annual Performance Report (APR) for CAMP Submission Process ( ),
Arizona Western College Assessment for Administrative Departments Part 2 Workshop Objectives Enter collected evidence of assessments and notate the findings.
1 SPDG Jennifer Coffey 323A State Personnel Development Grants SPDG Webinar on Grant Performance Report for Continuation Funding Jennifer Coffey Office.
1 DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS TO ENSURE STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES RECEIVE A QUALITY HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAM Performance Measurement, Program and Project Evaluation.
Spring 2015 OMSP Request For Proposal. Important Dates Intent to Submit: March 21, 2015 Applications: 4:30 p.m., Friday, May 15, 2015 Announcement of.
Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING FY 2015.
1 Jennifer Coffey 323A State Personnel Development Grants Webinar on Grant Performance Report for Continuation Funding Jennifer Coffey Office of Special.
Overview of the FY 2011 SPDG Competition Jennifer Coffey, Ph.D. State Personnel Development Grants Program Lead 1.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA 2004 Highly Qualified Teachers (HQT)
Selection Criteria and Invitational Priorities School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.
Project Design SPDG Competition FY C. QUALITY OF PROJECT DESIGN (0-20 points)  Describe the extent to which the goals, objectives, and outcomes.
GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING FY 2013 Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education.
PERSONNEL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM Webinar for 325D and 325K Grantees Completing the ED Grant Performance Report (ED 524B) for the Annual Performance.
325K: COMBINED PRIORITY FOR PERSONNEL PREPARATION Webinar on the Annual Performance Report for Continuation Funding Office of Special Education Programs.
325D: PREPARATION OF LEADERSHIP PERSONNEL Webinar on Project Objective and Performance Measures for the Annual Performance Report for Continuation Funding.
Educational Technology, Media, and Materials
Part C State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report:
ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORTS
Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education
323A State Personnel Development Grants SPDG Webinar on Grant Performance Report for Continuation Funding Jennifer Coffey Office of Special Education.
Facilitators: Jennifer Coffey, OSEP Project Officer
Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements
PROJECT PERFORMANCE MEASURES
Presentation transcript:

ANNUAL AND FINAL PERFORMANCE REPORTS 524B FORM REPORTING PERIOD BUDGET EXPENDITURES INDIRECT COST RATE PERFORMANCE MEASURES

IMPORTANCE OF PERFORMANCE REPORTING Reports from Project Directors are reviewed by Project Officers. Electronic files of individual project reports are submitted to a data base that is accessible to Department staff. Report data are used to evaluate individual projects. Individual project data are aggregated as a data source to inform OSEP’s annual progress report on the IDEA Part D programs for PART and GPRA. Data needs to be clearly articulated, accurate, and timely.

Annual reporting period is from the end of the previous reporting period or beginning of project for first year grants to 30 days before the due date. ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT

Final reporting period is from the beginning date of the grant to the end date of the performance period, including the no cost time extension, if appropriate. FINAL PERFORMANCE REPORT Final Report is due 90 calendar days after the end date of the performance period.

Must be data or information from the business or grants office. If proposal had “in-kind” contributions, it must be reported here. ANNUAL REPORT: Report the expenditures during the “Reporting Period.” FINAL REPORT: Report the expenditures for the final reporting period, including any no cost time extensions and the total expenditures for the performance period of the entire grant.

INDIRECT COST INFORMATION This section must be completed on both annual and final performance reports. If indirect costs are being charged to the grant (and most everyone does) then “yes” must be checked. To charge indirect costs the agency or institution must have an approved agreement for the % being charged to the grant. The approving agency is where the institution has the most grants; for most institutions it’s HHS.

Signatory must have authority to sign on behalf of the institution since the grant is from the Department to the institution and not to an individual. This will be checked “No” since OSEP is asking for data for the reporting period, not for the budget period. The date entered here will be the due date for your Final Performance Report; which is 90 days after the end of the grant. ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORTS

PROJECT STATUS CHART

Here you will enter one of the project’s objectives; on subsequent pages, you will enter all of the project’s objectives as submitted in your grant application. However, if your goals are more like measurable objectives and your objectives are more like performance measures, then you will want to enter a goal per page.

Here is where your performance measures go; those written in your grant proposal and/or those program measures that align with the objective. If none of the program measures align with a given Project Objective, then a program measure should NOT be included.

 Measure 1.1 – Evidence-Based Practices (Personnel): The percent of personnel receiving professional development through the SPDG based on scientific- or evidence-based instructional practices.  Measure 1.2 – State Performance Plan (SPP) Alignment: The percent of SPDG projects that implement personnel development/training activities that are aligned with improvement strategies identified in their SPP.  Measure 2.1 – Evidence-Based Practices (Training): The percentage of professional development/training activities provided through the SPDG based on scientific- or evidence- based instructional/behavioral practices.  Measure 2.2 – Sustained Practices: The percentage of professional development/training activities based on scientific- or evidence-based instructional/behavioral practices, provided through the SPDG program, that are sustained through on-going and comprehensive practices. (Long-term)  Measure 3.1 – Teacher Retention: In states with SPDG projects that have special education teacher retention as a goal, the statewide percentage of highly qualified special education teachers in state identified professional disciplines (e.g., teachers of children with emotional disturbance, deafness, etc.) who remain teaching after the first three years of employment.  Measure 4.1 – Scale-up Scientific- or Evidence-Based Practices: The percentage of SPDG projects that successfully replicate the use of scientific- or evidence-based instructional/behavioral practice in schools. (Long-term)

Here you identify if the performance measure was a project measure, “PROJ,” or a program measure, “PRGM.” Note: Program Measures refer to OSEP Measures required in all personnel prep grants. Project Measures are unique to your grant.

QUANTITATIVE DATA For measures that are a single number, e.g., # of workshops or # of students served, the target and actual data are reported as Raw Numbers, e.g., 10 workshops or 10 students. In this case, leave the Ratio and Percentage (%) columns blank.

For Performance Measures that are stated in terms of a percentage (e.g., percentage of students that attain proficiency), complete both the Ratio and the Percentage (%) columns. In this case, the Raw Number columns are left blank.

Data entered into the Ratio columns should be presented with the numerator representing the numerical target of the original proposal and the actual performance data. The denominators are to represent the universe. Then enter the corresponding %s in the (%) columns.

If the collection of quantitative data is NOT appropriate for a particular project performance measure, then enter “N/A” under the Raw Number and Percentage columns. N/A In this area of the page is where qualitative data can be reported along with other information you wish to report regarding the identified objective.

Final Page of the Report Here is where you can identify the “Program Performance Measures” that you haven’t reported data on through any of your objectives. Also, if you can’t collect and report any data, please explain that here. Our intent is for you to report on all Program Measures, using the APR and the Annual Student Data Collection.

Signatory must have authority to sign on behalf of the agency or institution since the grant is from the Department to the agency or institution and not to an individual.individual This will be checked “Yes” since OSEP is asking for complete data in final reports, not for the budget period. The date entered here will be the due date for your Final Performance Report; which is 90 days after the end of the grant. FINAL PERFORMANCE REPORTS