Main Injector Beam Position Monitor Upgrade: Status and Plans Rob Kutschke All Experimenters’ Meeting April 3, 2006 Beams-doc-2217-v3.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Proton Beam Measurements in the Recycler Duncan Scott On Behalf of the Main Injector Group.
Advertisements

Proton Plan PMG 7/26/07 E Prebys 1 Proton Plan Status June Eric Prebys.
1 Proton Upgrades at Fermilab Robert Zwaska Fermilab March 12, 2007 Midwest Accelerator Physics Collaboration Meeting Indiana University Cyclotron Facility.
Re-commissioning the Recycler Storage Ring at Fermilab Martin Murphy, Fermilab Presented August 10, 2012 at SLAC National Laboratory for the Workshop on.
NOvA meeting PIP Update W. Pellico. PIP Goals and Scope (Provided in 2011 – Directorate S. H. / DOE Talk ) Goals: Specific to the issues surrounding the.
Paul Derwent 30 Nov 00 1 The Fermilab Accelerator Complex o Series of presentations  Overview of FNAL Accelerator Complex  Antiprotons: Stochastic Cooling.
Tevatron BPM Upgrade Project Manager Overview Stephen Wolbers Tev BPM Technology Choice Review December 16, 2003.
3/7/05A. Semenov Batch-by-Batch Intensity Monitor 1 Two-Channel Batch by Batch Intensity Monitor for Main Injector BBI.
Proton Plan PMG 3/22/07 E Prebys 1 Proton Plan Status February Eric Prebys.
1 Electron Cloud Measurements at the Fermilab Main Injector Bob Zwaska Fermilab ECloud07 Workshop April 9, 2007.
F MI High Power Operation and Future Plans Ioanis Kourbanis (presented by Bruce Brown) HB2008 August 25, 2008.
Antiproton Source Capabilities and Issues Keith Gollwitzer & Valeri Lebedev Accelerator Division Fermilab 1.
August 05, Startup 2013 Machine Status:  Proton Source Commissioning and Studies RFQ Injector Line (RIL) Linac Booster  Main Injector Startup.
INTRODUCTION  RECYCLER BPM – Original system not adequate to measure beam position precisely. It is being upgraded to meet the required physics precision.
Tevatron BPM System Upgrade Technical Update Bob Webber Run II Luminosity Upgrade Review February 2004.
F Antiproton Source Apertures Steve Werkema DOE Tevatron Operations Review March 22, 2006.
Run II PMG 2/16/06 Martens/Sims 1 Run II Upgrades Status February 2006.
Figure 2 gives an overview of the hardware components of the upgraded Main Injector BPM system. The figure shows 2 signal channels which produce one position.
AAC February 4-6, 2003 Protons on Target Ioanis Kourbanis MI/Beams.
Ff NO A Accelerator Upgrades: Status Phil Adamson Fermilab
F Booster Long Straight Corrector Upgrade Technical Status and Schedule for Installation Craig Drennan DOE Tevatron Operations Review March 27, 2007.
Proton Study Meeting 4/19/05 Eric Prebys 1 Proton Plan Stage I Eric Prebys.
F Proton Plan Eric Prebys, FNAL Accelerator Division.
Run II Operational Status and Plans Run II Meeting October 28, 2004 Dave McGinnis.
The Main Injector Beam Position Monitor Front-End Software Luciano Piccoli, Stephen Foulkes, Margaret Votava and Charles Briegel Fermi National Accelerator.
Check lists to mouse clicks Automation Session : WAO The Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory is a U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) research laboratory,
All Experimenters' Mtg - Aug. 04, 2003 Week in Review: 07/28/03 –08/03/03 Doug Moehs – FNAL Stores and Operations Summary Standard Plots.
The ATF Damping Ring BPM Upgrade Nathan Eddy, Eliana Gianfelice-Wendt Fermilab for the ATF Damping Ring BPM Team.
BPM Upgrade Projects Status & Technical Update Bob Webber DOE Review of Tevatron Operations March 2005.
F Beam Line Tuners Vic Scarpine Instrumentation DoE Review Oct 28-31, 2002.
TeV BLM Review 4/19/041 Tevatron BLM Review - Schedule BLM Replacement Prototype schedule: Provide prototype digitizer cards, crate, readout path by ~
Accelerator Issues Fermilab Antiproton Experiment Keith Gollwitzer Antiproton Source Department Accelerator Division Fermilab.
Beam Line BPM Filter Module Nathan Eddy May 31, 2005.
AP2 Line & Debuncher Studies Status Keith Gollwitzer Antiproton Source January 9, 2006 Many people involved with providing the hardware and software that.
MI primer for NuMI users  Getting beam  TLG modules  Timelines  Beam intensity  NuMI kickers  Extraction bumps and last turn positions  Batch positions.
Tevatron BPM Upgrade Stephen Wolbers CD Accelerator Coordination Meeting August 3, 2004.
F All Experimenters' Mtg - 2 Jun 03 Weeks in Review: 05/19/03 –06/02/03 Keith Gollwitzer – FNAL Stores and Operations Summary Standard Plots.
Tevatron BPM Upgrade Stephen Wolbers CD Accelerator Coordination Meeting September 21, 2004.
Recent Work Towards Increasing the AP2 & Debuncher Aperture – Keith Gollwitzer – May 9, Recent Work Towards Increasing the AP2 & Debuncher Aperture.
Updated Overview of Run II Upgrade Plan Beam Instrumentation Bob Webber Run II Luminosity Upgrade Review February 2004.
What’s Up in the Booster Eric Prebys February 27, 2002 and March 6, 2003.
Simultaneous Position Measurements of Protons and Anti-Protons in the Tevatron R. K. Kutschke †, J. Steimel, R.Webber, S. Wolbers, Fermilab*, Batavia,
Doug Michael Sep. 16, GeV protons 1.9 second cycle time 4x10 13 protons/pulse 0.4 MW! Single turn extraction (10  s) 4x10 20 protons/year 700.
Proton Plan PMG 2/23/06 E Prebys 1 Proton Plan Status January Report Eric Prebys.
Proton Source Improvement Workshop Cogging W. Pellico Dec 6&
Run II PMG 1/19/06 Pushpa Bhat 1 Run II Upgrades Status January 2006 Pushpa Bhat.
TeV BPM Review 12/16/2003 Summary Status, Motivation, and Directions.
RECYCLER REQUIREMENTS FOR THE RECYCLER RING & ASSOCIATED TRANSFER LINES BPMs Brajesh Choudhary for the MI Dept.
Craig Drennan Linac and 400 MeV BPMs January 7, 2011.
9/2/2003Tev BPM requirements1 Tevatron BPM and BLM requirements Mike Martens.
Proton Plan PMG 2/22/07 E Prebys 1 Proton Plan Status January Eric Prebys.
Status of the Accelerator Complex Keith Gollwitzer Antiproton Source Accelerator Division Fermilab 2009 Fermilab Users’ Meeting.
Users' Mtg - 4 Jun 08 FNAL Accelerator Complex Status Ron Moore Fermilab – AD / Tevatron Dept.
Proton Plan PMG 10/13/05 E Prebys 1 Proton Plan Status September Report Eric Prebys.
Early Beam Injection Scheme for the Fermilab Booster: A Path for Intensity Upgrade Chandra Bhat Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory DPF2015, ANN ARBOR,
F Record luminosities at the Tevatron & Future potentiality Steve Werkema Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Batavia, Illinois USA Asian Particle Accelerator.
F Possible Proton Capabilities at Fermilab Dave McGinnis April 16, 2007.
Robert R. Wilson Prize Talk John Peoples April APS Meeting: February 14,
Beam time structures 1 At any particular instance of time there will be only one kind of beam in the MI. It will be either protons or anti-protons. The.
12/16/03Tev BPM requirements1 Tevatron BPM requirements Mike Martens.
August 12, Machine Status: 2013  Proton Source Commissioning and Studies RFQ Injector Line (RIL) Linac : Roof hatch installed Booster : Magnet.
PAC Meeting, December 12, Prebys 1 The Problem.
Pbar Production Status & Plans to get to 25mA/hr Keith Gollwitzer Antiproton Source August 31, 2006.
Limitations to Total Booster Flux Total protons per batch: 4E12 with decent beam loss, 5E12 max. Average rep rate of the machine: –Injection bump magnets.
Tevatron Beam Position Monitor Upgrade Stephen Wolbers (for the Tevatron BPM Upgrade Project) PAC05, Knoxville, TN May 16-20, 2005.
F Project X: Recycler 8.9 GeV/c Extraction D. Johnson, E. Prebys, M. Martens, J. Johnstone Fermilab Accelerator Advisory Committee August 8, 2007 D. Johnson.
MI/RR Operation Status Ioanis Kourbanis August 21, 2014.
Antiproton Acceptance Steve Werkema DOE Review February 24, 2004.
A Survey of TBT Capabilities of the Upgraded TeV BPMs Rob Kutschke, CD/EXP Tevatron Department Meeting February 18, 2005 Beams-doc-1583-v2.
A Survey of the Capabilities of the Upgraded TeV BPMs Rob Kutschke, CD/EXP Run II Meeting March 24, 2005 Beams-doc-1752-v2.
Presentation transcript:

Main Injector Beam Position Monitor Upgrade: Status and Plans Rob Kutschke All Experimenters’ Meeting April 3, 2006 Beams-doc-2217-v3

4/3/2006Rob Kutschke, MI BPMs2 Project Overview Goals: Improved functionality, reliability. –Improved position resolution. –Measurement of pbar positions. New capability in MI. –Highly configurable. New capability in MI. Joint project: AD/CD. Core technology: –Commercial digital receiver board (Echotek). –Now a standard: RR, TeV, transfer line and MI BPMs. Evolution of previous Echotek-based designs. 208 BPM locations –Including 7 new wide aperture BPMs.

4/3/2006Rob Kutschke, MI BPMs3 Major Modes Closed orbit (CO): –Average over all bunches for ~40 turns. –Averages out betatron motion (not synchrotron motion; by design). Turn by Turn (TbT): –Average position over ~44 buckets (~1/13 of circumference). –Usually triggered by injection/extraction TCLK events. –Can be hand triggered at an arbitrary time, eg. pinger. Safe mode: –Failsafe operation when high accuracy timing is not available. –Average position over ~44 buckets. –Report updated position every ~22 buckets. –Continuous for about ~470 turns. CO and TbT: implemented for both 2.5 MHz and 53 MHz.

4/3/2006Rob Kutschke, MI BPMs4 Sources of beam: –Booster, ACC, RR –TeV (tuneup)! Beam destinations: –TeV, RR, NUMI, SY120 –Pbar production target –ACC ( tuneup)!

4/3/2006Rob Kutschke, MI BPMs5 Main Injector Cycles Cartoon definition: –Inject beam (one or many times). –Do something with it: Slip position Ramp to new energy Change RF structure –Send beam to one or more destination(s). –Typical duration: a few seconds. Many tens of possible cycles. Timeline generator “plays” a long sequence of interleaved cycles. Bookkeeping complexity: –Different combination of measurements for each type of cycle. –Detailed TbT timing is different for each cycle. –Separate data buffers for each type of cycle.

4/3/2006Rob Kutschke, MI BPMs6 Cartoon of the Hardware

4/3/2006Rob Kutschke, MI BPMs7 Cartoon of Transition and Echotek Boards Transition Echotek From BPM

4/3/2006Rob Kutschke, MI BPMs8 Notes on Cartoon Figures TGF, Combiner and Transition boards: in-house designs. Combiner board: –Old boxes contained a band pass filter to select only the 53 MHz component: Anti-protons are usually bunched at 2.5 MHz so the old system was blind to anti-protons (most of the time). New system allows both 53 MHz and 2.5 MHz components to pass. –Can see anti-protons now. –Old system was H/V switchable: Rarely used. Now fixed H or V. Reduces points of failure by removing unnecessary complexity. –New style BPMs at large aperture quads: 4 electrodes in traditional H/V style. Will read out both H and V. Transition Board: –Two pass bands: 53 MHz and 2.5 MHz. –Gain in each band separately controllable. –Output can be one, other or sum.

4/3/2006Rob Kutschke, MI BPMs9 Proton Beam: Anti-proton Production (slip stacking) + NUMI

4/3/2006Rob Kutschke, MI BPMs10 Observed RMS includes resolution of the instrument plus real beam motion. –Almost certainly dominated by real beam motion, especially for the horizontal BPMs. –Resolution <~ 3  m. Meets required CO position resolution of 50  m (3  ).

4/3/2006Rob Kutschke, MI BPMs11 Transfer of anti-protons from Recycler to TeV. ( Mode switch on the fly! )

4/3/2006Rob Kutschke, MI BPMs12 Looking Ahead April 2006: –Receive production transition boards and crate backplanes. –Most other components in hand. –Assemble and test complete crates in the lab. Late May 2006: –Restart MI using the BPM system as it existed at shutdown: 11 upgraded BPMs, remainder old. –Continue commissioning of existing house during this time. Once operations have been re-established, install remaining BPMs. –Details of timing to be negotiated with MI operations and MI BLM upgrade project. –Can be performed while MI is operation. Completion goal: summer Anticipated effort: 7 to 10 FTEs / month.

4/3/2006Rob Kutschke, MI BPMs13 Summary and Conclusions Design is complete and well tested. Commissioning of first house advanced. –Will be completed during the restart phase. Will be ready to install all new hardware before the restart. –Last components (transition boards) due during shutdown. Expect to complete installation and commissioning within a month of getting the go ahead. This talk is Beams-doc-2217.

4/3/2006Rob Kutschke, MI BPMs14 Backup Slides

4/3/2006Rob Kutschke, MI BPMs15 Cycle Dependent Configuration MI State 5: –Two batches from booster. Slip stack to form one batch. –Five more batches from booster. –Ramp to extraction energy. –Deliver slip stacked batch to anti-proton production target. –Deliver 5 remaining batches to NUMI. –Repeat about every 2 seconds ( may interleave with other cycles). BPM Configuration: –For each of 7 injections, measure the leading half of the newly injected batch, TbT by turn for 512 turns. –After last injection, make CO measurements; report at 500 Hz. –Just before extraction change back to TbT mode and measure the last few turns before one of the extractions. Not enough time between extractions to reconfigure the system to get both. –Store all information until the next instance of state 5.

4/3/2006Rob Kutschke, MI BPMs16 Timeline to Date December 2004 – first organizational meetings. Summer 2005 – Project started. December 2005 – First measurements using prototype transition and TGF boards. February 2006 – One “house” (11 BPMS) instrumented using preproduction transition boards and production TGF. –Used operationally for about 1 week before shutdown. All major capabilities have been demonstrated at least once. –Many capabilities have been routinely used for about 2 weeks. –Commissioning of the first house is nearing completion. Effort: typically 7 to 10 FTEs / month