1 State of play and outlook of modelling based prioritisation Klaus Daginnus Institute for Health & Consumer Protection Joint Research Centre, European.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chemicals in the context of the Water Information System for Europe (WISE) Bo N Jacobsen EEA Chemicals and Water workshop 6-7 December 2010, EEA, Copenhagen.
Advertisements

Basic approaches in RISK ASSESSMENT István Murányi Hungarian Cosmetic and Home Care Association.
Interactions between IED and REACH Exploring the opportunities for cooperation Valletta, Malta October 2013 Geert Dancet Executive Director Conference.
1 EU Risk Assessment on Nickel Joint Meeting Birmingham, 4 th October 2007.
Toxics Use Reduction Institute Chemicals Policy in Europe: New Directions Rachel Massey Policy Analyst April 2006.
PROTECTFP Work Package 1:- results from questionnaire and overview of tools for chemical assessment.
1 Persistent, Bioaccumulative and Toxic Pollutants Persistent, Bioaccumulative and Toxic Pollutants Programme (PBT) launched by the EPA in 1998: - Reduce.
1 REACh Registration, Evaluation and Authorization of Chemicals and Restriction! Ohio Valley SOT Wednesday, August 26, 2009 REACh: The New Toxicology Frontier.
Nano-Safety: Some Future Perspectives Conference on Nano-Safety April, Slovenia, Ljubljana Bjorn G. Hansen dHoU Chemicals, DG ENV, European Commission.
1 Use of HPV Challenge Data and the EPI Suite TM Model E. Laurence Libelo Economics, Exposure, and Technology Division Office of Pollution Prevention and.
Results of Canadian DSL Categorization Activities – What’s Next CPPI April 28, 2006 Calgary AB Health Santé Canada.
Towards a harmonised approach for collection and interpretation of data on emerging substances in the environment in support of European environmental.
GHS CLASSIFICATION ONLINE. Registration: Click on “Register”
International Initiatives and the U.S. HPV Challenge Program Ken Geiser, PhD Lowell Center for Sustainable Production University of Massachusetts Lowell.
Preparing for REACH implementation: The RIP process Dimosthenis A. Sarigiannis, PhD Institute for Health and Consumer Protection DG Joint Research Centre.
REACH New requirements for introduction of chemicals on EU market Jana Kovačičová Centre for Chemical Substances and Preparations Bratislava, Slovakia.
Nanosciences and nanotechnologies: European Action
1 Selected Current and Suggested Ideas on Uses of HPV Challenge Data Nhan Nguyen US EPA Characterizing Chemicals in Commerce: Using Data on High Production.
15-16 March 2010, WG-E, DG-ENV, Brussels1 Results of the modelling-based prioritisation exercise J.M. Zaldívar, K. Daginnus, S. Gottardo and A. Payá Institute.
Research & Science Advancing Risk Assessment Presentation March Association of Chemical Industry of the Czech Republic Monique Marrec Fairley.
Water.europa.eu Policy update with regard to Priority and Emerging Substances SOCOPSE Final Conference Maastricht, June 2009 Jorge Rodriguez Romero.
Dutch plan for finalising Hair software package Alterra – Wageningen University and Research Centre Roel Kruijne Working Group Meeting on Pesticide Statistics,
Malaysia Update on “draft” proposal for the Environmentally Hazardous Substance (“EHS”) Notification and Registration Scheme.
REACH Activities in progress in ITALY UNICHIM - Milano
ETUC Conference on REACH March 2005 Improving REACH ETUC proposals for REGISTRATION Werner SCHNEIDER DGB, Germany.
REACH: state of art and base definitions WERCS 2007 US User group Albany 27/06/2007 Dr. Erwin Annys Sr. Advisor Product & Innovation Policy.
JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE EUROPEAN COMMISSION European Chemicals Bureau Risk Assessment - New and Existing Substances Risk Assessment - New and Existing Substances.
Sub-group on Prioritisation of Emerging Contaminants in Groundwater 1 st meeting - Introduction Dr. Benjamin Lopez (Fr. Geo. Survey) UBA - Bismarckplatz,
REACH: state of art and base definitions Dr. Erwin Annys Sr. Advisor Product & Innovation Policy WERCS 2007 EU User group Napoli 31/05/07.
Ukraine Petro Nakhaba All-Ukrainian Public Organization “ Chysta Khvylya ” Deputy Head Kyiv, Ukraine Contaminated Sites Management Joint UMOE-DEPA Project.
Rob Collins Water Group EEA Hazardous Substances in Europe’s fresh and marine waters – An overview Report for publication – 1 st half of 2011 Rob Collins.
1 State of Play Prioritisation of Substances By modelling Hazard & Exposure Klaus Daginnus Institute for Health & Consumer Protection Joint Research Centre,
June 2009 Regulation on pesticide statistics Pierre NADIN ESTAT E1- Farms, agro-environment and rural development
Water.europa.eu Draft mandate WGE Chemical Status WG E Priority Substances 8-9 October 2009 Jorge Rodriguez Romero Madalina David DG Environment, European.
Transforming Our World: Delivering affordable medicines to anyone, anywhere, any day 1 Environmental hazards of substances Annex 1 – Part 4 of CLP Date:
Chemicals Policy and Health (CP&H) Introduction to Ecetoc TRA GPS Risk Assessment and REACH/GHS implementation in practice Leo Heezen Cefic 30 – 31 May.
Key elements of the concepts and approaches within the EU in the chemical sector Dr. Marcus Moreno-Horn TAIEX: Workshop, Yerevan 2-3 May 2011 Federal Office.
REACH 2018 Assess hazards and risks of your chemicals.
Cefic template to convert REACH dossier
ICCA GPS Risk Assessment and Guidance
Communication: Safety Summary
GC Chemical Characteristics Task Group
REACH Regulation (EC) No.1907/2006
Update on recent developments in the ed regulatory landscape in Europe
Groundwater Watch List Meeting
Marine Environment and Water Industry Unit
NORMAN Working Group 1: Prioritisation Sub-Group 1 : Groundwater Approach suggested for exposure assessment Dr. Benjamin Lopez I will.
Chemicals and their properties Day 1.
Review of the WFD priority substances list
ECETOC TRA tool Proposed application to estimate PEC/PNEC ratio for substances with risk score = 1 ECETOC has developed a tiered approach for calculating.
Biocides Dissemination
on Priority Substances Strategic Coordination Group
Categorization of the Canadian Domestic Substances List
WG-E(1) Meeting, CCAB, Brussels, 06/03/2007
Proposals for the Identification and Prioritisation of Candidate Priority Substances under the next Review Dean Leverett Graham Merrington.
MSFD list of criteria elements
Report Of further work on Prioritization 5th meeting WG-E
Nickel Risk Assessment
MSFD list of criteria elements
- Priority Substances - Strategic Coordination Group
International Initiatives and the U.S. HPV Challenge Program
European Commission, DG Environment Air & Industrial Emissions Unit
WG E on Priority Substances
Presentation to IPC RoHS Meeting
Sub-Group on Review of Priority Substances – state of play
WG Hazardous substances * Marine Strategy 19 November 2003
Conclusions from the Review of REACH
EAF (9) Meeting, CCAB, Brussels, 02/10/2006
Mandate and proposal for working methods
Presentation transcript:

1 State of play and outlook of modelling based prioritisation Klaus Daginnus Institute for Health & Consumer Protection Joint Research Centre, European Commission Working Group E, Brussels 8-9 October

2 State of play Hazard assessment PBT & vPvB assessment Use Assessment Gathering data from REACH registration Gathering data from SPIN Risk Ranking (level 1) combined score from hazard & use assessment 4 th expert group meeting Methods to prioritise substances agreed Timetable 5 th expert group meeting Presentation & discussion of the results DG ENV requested data from ECHA / SIEFs No data available yet Alternative gathering data From IUCLID implemented

3 Starting list Inputs Member States: Monitoring data (all MS) DK, SK, SV, UK European Parliament Stakeholders: EEB, Greenpeace, IARW Research NORMAN Joint Danube Survey 2 OSPAR (EEB, Greenpeace) List of substances for priority action & List of substances of possible concern Joint Research Centre IHCP / Ex-ECB PBT, RAR, IUCLID, ClassLab, ENDDA (in progress, see )

4 Starting list Output CAS- Merge 2034 substances Generation of 1892 Structures  Input for QSAR Generation of Substance identification data SMILES, INCHI, IUPAC Names REACH: Registration date, EC Number,... Existing Substances Regulation: PBT evaluation Risk assessment reports: results aquatic concern Classification & Labelling (substances hazardous for water R50-R53) Pesticides: Status EC 91/414 Source information: nominated by …

5 Starting list modelling based prioritisation

6 Hazard Assessment REACH Guidance on Information requirements and chemical safety assessment Part B - Hazard Assessment & Part C - PBT & vPvB assessment or according to scientific progress Hazard Scoring Total Score (PBT) = Score P + Score B + Score T + Score ED If substance has been classified as P or B or T or is listed as endocrine active substance (CAT1&2), +1 has been added to the score Total Score (vPvB) = 4

7 Hazard Assessment Persistence Assessment P PISUITE Version Priority BIOHCWIN > BIOWIN BIOHCWIN has been developed specifically for the biodegradation half life prediction of petroleum hydrocarbons BIOWIN estimates the probability of rapid aerobic biodegradation of an organic compound in the presence of mixed population of environmental microorganisms Assessment vP OECD LRTP tool ml The OECD Pov and LRTP Screening Tool has been developed with the aim of using multimedia models for estimating overall persistence (Pov) and long-range transport potential (LRTP) of organic chemicals at a screening level, in the context of PBTs/POPs assessments.

8 Assessment B Priority: experimental data > QSAR Experimental data from PhysProp do/product.aspx?id=133, data are accessible also from EPISUITEhttp:// do/product.aspx?id=133 Applied QSAR models: EPISUITE (BCFBAF update Jan 2009) CAESAR JRC BCF model Application of worst case for experimental data / QSAR at the 1 st level Hazard Scoring Bioaccumulation

9 Hazard Scoring Toxicity Priority experimental data > QSAR Priority chronic > acute toxicity data Experimental data ECETOC (TR 0091) Footprint DSSTOX QSAR data 4 QSAR models [ADMET Predictor proprietary model, 3 JRC models) using the DSSTOX data were run to estimate toxicity using a consensus approach PNECs were calculated with preference to experimental data > QSAR (AF 1000) chronic > acute toxicity data

10 Workflow Hazard Scoring Toxicity (ECETOC) 1. Data mining ECETOC 2. Merging & Classification Merge ECETOC 436 Merge ECETOC WFD 203

11 Exposure Scoring Use assessment Use index 0.1 controlled system 0.2 industrial use 0.5 wide dispersive use 1.0 used in the environment (pesticides, biocides) Use index * Production volume (t/y) Score 0 = = = = > 1000 IUCLID 921 substances (merge WFD list) > dossiers SPIN 301 substances

12 Exposure assessment score Hazard assessment score Risk Ranking Scoring

13 Data pass, Data fail PBT P & B & T List Score Risk Workflow Risk Ranking (PBT) Excel Table + data for PEC calculation Score Risk

14 Proposed application to estimate PEC/PNEC ratio for substances with risk score = 1 ECETOC has developed a tiered approach for calculating the exposure and related risks to consumers, workers and the environment caused by chemicals :  Tier 1: based on pre-defined and conservative use scenarios corresponding to Environmental Release Categories (ERC) described under REACH Guidance (Chapter R.16)  Tier 2: detailed risk assessment on previously identified uses (additional more realistic exposure input) Developed in Excel, contains the user interface and the datasheets Freely downloadable after registration from: ECETOC TRA tool

15 ECETOC TRA tool

16 Summary Starting list of chemicals completed relevant databases for Toxicity and Production volumes & uses data-mined State of the art QSARs applied to fill data gaps not applicable for inorganic, metall-organic compounds Risk ranking carried out timely for Starting list, excel table available Scores (hazard, use assessment, risk ranking) PNECs water calculated Substance identification data (Names, source of nomination, CAS, SMILES,...) Physical chemical data (log Kow, Solubility, multi-media fate, as input for PEC calculation) De-listing criteria (legal status 91/414,...)

17 Outlook Calculation of PEC and PEC/PNEC by TRA tool ECETOC Refinement of PEC & PNEC by peer review recommended risk assessment reports available? data from research available? E.g. KNAPPE NORMAN, … JRC report in progress