ASSTAR Airborne Separation Operations in Oceanic Airspace Bob McPike, NATS ASAS-TN2 Conference Glasgow, September 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MINIMUM NAVIGATION PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATION AIRSPACE (MNPS)
Advertisements

FANS (Future Air Navigation System) Flight Crew Procedures
UNIVERSITY of GLASGOW A Comprehensive Approach to ATM Incorporating Autonomous Aircraft ATM Research Group University of Glasgow.
Page 1 CARE/ASAS Activity 3: ASM workshop Brétigny, 19 December 2001 Autonomous Aircraft OSED CARE-ASAS Activity 3: ASM Autonomous Aircraft OSED.
Air Traffic Management
SOCM-2 Seminar Data Link Benefits Presented By: Dennis Addison, FAA
The European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation The need for Data sharing Generic Civil-Military Cooperation.
SC227 – SC214 ISRA – Datalink Interface. PBN Manual, Part A, Chapter On-board performance monitoring and alerting On-board performance.
High Ice Water Content: B787 Flight Planning and Execution Nathan Polderman Sr. Manager, Network Operations Center Training Captain Rocky Stone Chief Technical.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration ICAO Communication Failure Coordinating Group (CFCG) Update IPACG/39 Keith Dutch, FAA 03 – 06 February.
METEOROLOGICAL INFORMATION FOR GENERAL AVIATION IN SLOVENIA.
Federal Aviation Administration Presented To: IPACG/39 Presented By: Dennis Addison, FAA Date: February 5-6, 2014 WP02: Timing Errors in Oakland OCA.
Advanced Safe Separation Technologies and Algorithms (ASSTAR) Project ASAS-TN2 Workshop #1 Malmö 26 th -28 th September 2005 ASSTAR is a Specific Targeted.
Analysis of ATC Communication messages Relevant to Altitude Change Requests Electronic Navigation Research Institute IPACG/39, 5-6 February 2014, Fukuoka,
ASSTAR User Forum #1 Rome 4th April 2006 ASAS-TN2 Second Workshop Benefit Appraisal for Oceanic Applications Dr T E Johnson, BAE Systems
Applications from packages I to III
Presented to: Teterboro User Group By: Vincent Gerry Date: 18 January 2012 Federal Aviation Administration Operations in the New York Center CTA/FIR.
1 M I T I n t e r n a t i o n a l C e n t e r f o r A i r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n Human Factors Considerations in Future Oceanic Air Traffic Control.
ASSTAR Oceanic Applications by Nico de Gelder, NLR ASSTAR User Forum #1 4 April 2006, Roma.
Airborne Traffic Situational Awareness – In-Trail Procedure (ATSA-ITP)
Chapter 5:intrument flight rules
AIRSPACE What’s old –What’s new!.
Presented by Joël Morin to Space Weather Workshop 2008.
Federal Aviation Administration ASAS issues identified in the AP23 work ASAS-TN2.5 workshop 13 Nov 08, Rome By Jean-Marc Loscos, DSNA.
CPDLC / ADS Operations 4/22/2017 2:35 PM
Role of ATFM in managing adverse weather conditions Collaborative approach with neighbors & the role of cross border ATFM A B Chattoraj & A B Joshi, Airports.
1 September 28th, 2005 NASA ASAS R&D A IRSPACE S YSTEMS P ROGRAM Michael H. Durham Kenneth M. Jones Thomas J. Graff.
ASSTAR User Forum #1 Rome 4th April 2006 ASAS-TN2 Second Workshop ASSTAR Safety Approach and Preliminary Issues Dr Giuseppe GRANIERO, SICTA
Workshop on FORMAL METHODS IN AEROSPACE, Eindhoven,November 3, 2009 Observability and Diagnosability of Hybrid Automata, and their application in Air Traffic.
4 th Workshop, Amsterdam, 23 rd -25 th April 2007 ASAS LC&P Applications in Radar Airspace: Operational Scenario Example and Fast-Time Simulation Results.
6-1 Design of UAV Systems UAV operating environmentsc 2002 LM Corporation Lesson objective - to discuss UAV Operating Environments including … National.
Leading Cadet Training
Clustering ASAS Applications ASAS-TN2 First Workshop, Malmö 26 to 28 September 2005 Fraser McGibbon BAE Systems.
ASAS-TN Second Workshop, 6-8 October 2003, MalmöSlide 1 Airborne Surveillance Applications included in ‘Package I’ Francis Casaux CARE/ASAS manager.
CRISTAL ITP European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation CRISTAL ITP ASAS-TN, Paris Johan Martensson CASCADE CRISTAL ITPJohan Martensson ASAS-TN.
CARE/ASAS Validation Framework Guidelines & Case Studies Mark Watson NATS.
ASAS TN2 WP3: Assessing ASAS Applications Maturity Eric Hoffman EUROCONTROL.
Federal Aviation Administration Surveillance and Broadcast Services ADS-B In-Trail Procedures Presented to the ASAS TN 2.5 Workshop November 2008 Kenneth.
RECITE A PRAYER…(15 SECONDS). ATM TOPIC 1. INTRODUCTION TO AIR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT,TYPE OF CONTROL AREAS & FLIGHT PLAN 2. AERODROME CONTROL 3. AREA CONTROL.
Tim Myers – Metron Aviation August 26, Evaluate weather-related operational inefficiencies or safety hazards in remote, non-radar controlled airspace.
ASAS WORKSHOP Roma April 2003 Airlines’ perspective Nicolas Zvéguintzoff Assistant Director- Technical / Financial Liaison – Europe.
Federal Aviation Administration AP23 briefing on D3: ASAS Concept of operations ASAS-GN Seminar 13 Nov 08, Rome By Ken Carpenter, QinetiQ.
Algorithm Design for Crossing and Passing Applications John Anderson and Colin Goodchild University of Glasgow, UK Thierry Miquel DSNA, Toulouse, France.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration ADS-B In-Trail Procedures Overview of Research Results Presented to the ASAS TN2 Workshop September 2007.
CARE/ASAS Activity 2 Follow-up: Validation Framework Dissemination Forum Isdefe Ingeniería de Sistemas CARE/ASAS ACTIVITY 2 FOLLOW-UP: VALIDATION.
Glasgow 12 September 20061/22DEEP BLUE CONSULTING AND RESEARCH | CLAUDIA FUSAI ASAS-TN2 Controllers situational awareness issues.
Malmö 5 September. 27 th 2005 NUP ITP TT Reykjavik “NUP -- ITP”
1 Airborne Separation Assistance Systems (ASAS) - Summary of simulations Joint ASAS-TN2/IATA/AEA workshop NLR, Amsterdam, 8 th October 2007 Chris Shaw.
Advanced ATC Techniques Procedural Separation
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration CFCG ICAO Communication Failure Coordinating Group IPACG/40 Keith Dutch, AJV September.
ASAS Crossing and Passing Applications in Radar Airspace (operational concept and operational procedure) Jean-Marc Loscos, Bernard Hasquenoph, Claude Chamayou.
Worldwide Symposium on Performance of the Air Navigation System, Montreal, 29 March RNA and RNAV and RNP Strategy in Japan Yoshiki Imawaka Director.
1 International Flight Operations Efficiency Enhancements: Oceanic Navigation and the North Atlantic Track System (NATS) Presented by Frank Ketcham.
Vertical, lateral separations based on time / distance
ASSTAR Overview Jean-Marc Loscos, DSNA
TYPES, AIRSPACE CLASSIFICATION, CHANGE FROM ONE TO ANOTHER
ASSTAR Airborne Separation Applications
CGS Ground School Pilot navigation ATC procedures
VARIOUS KINDS OF SEPARATION
longitudinal separations based on time / distance
ASSTAR Oceanic Session Summary
Rome November 2008 Johan Martensson, CASCADE
FANS (Future Air Navigation System) Flight Crew Procedures
AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE
ASSTAR Project Overview & User Forum Objectives
Oceanic and International Operations
Oceanic and International Operations
Oceanic and International Operations
RNAV and RNP Strategy in Japan
Oceanic and International Operations
Presentation transcript:

ASSTAR Airborne Separation Operations in Oceanic Airspace Bob McPike, NATS ASAS-TN2 Conference Glasgow, September 2006

page 2 Overview  Background to oceanic operations  ASAS operations to improve flight flexibility  ASAS operations to manage airspace congestion

page 3 Oceanic Communications  No VHF Radio or radar cover over most of the North Atlantic Region (NAT)  Voice communications provided by High Frequency (HF) Radio  HF subject to weather effects –Audibility can be limited –Sometimes communication is impossible  So ATC issues strategic clearances –Issued prior to entering an oceanic Flight Information Region (FIR) –Extend from Oceanic Control Area (OCA) entry to landfall –Long-term conflict prediction used to ensure no separation loss over whole route

page 4 Oceanic Separation Standards  Separation standards governed by various uncertainties: –Communication unreliability –Navigational accuracy –Accuracy of forward estimates (driven by weather forecasts)... so separation standards are very large 10 mins 60 miles 1000 ft 15 mins

page 5 ASAS in Oceanic Airspace  ASAS concepts under consideration by ASSTAR for oceanic airspace –In-Trail Procedure (ATSA-ITP and ASEP-ITP) –In-Trail Follow (ASEP-ITF) –Self-Separation on a Free-Flight Track (SSEP-FFT)  Status –Concepts and procedures defined –Simulations will be conducted in Amsterdam November 2006 to March 2007

page 6 In-Trail Procedure FL340 FL360 FL350 > 10 mins ATSA-ITP Criteria Aircraft at FL340 would like to climb ….. But standard longitudinal separation does not exist at level above Crew request an ITP Climb 5 mins

page 7 In-Trail Follow 5 mins 5 minutes : No standard longitudinal separation ITF Airborne Separation Established: In-Trail Follow Climb Approved, Maintaining In-Trail Airborne Separation In-Trail Separation maintained over extended period Second climb approved –Maintaining ITF Separation In-Trail Follow cancelled Exit Oceanic Airspace FL360 FL350 FL340

page 8 Self-Separation on a Free-Flight Track  Concept still in the early stages of development  FFT is an OTS track reserved for ASAS-capable aircraft  Aircraft on the track can change speed and level at their own discretion... but no lateral flexibility allowed  Aircraft requires downstream clearance to re-enter managed airspace

page 9 Using ASAS to manage airspace congestion  Oceanic/Domestic Interface - a Plumbing Problem? –Narrow ‘pipes’ in European/North American regions –European pipework highly complex (lots of crossing and converging traffic)

page 10 Traffic Concentration 24 May 2006

page 11 Traffic Streaming

page 12 Tactical re-routes in the NAT 15 minutes 4 minutes ITF

page 13 Thank you for listening