1 TDTWG March 4, 2009 Performance Measures Overview.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Market True-Up Discussion RMS Meeting 03/13/02 Draft Only for Discussion Purposes.
Advertisements

Demand Response Task Force February 2008 Update. Bridge Solution Short Term Only: Use as “bridge” to long term solution Standardize Energy Impacts: Utilize.
Update to RMS January 6, RMGRR – Revision to Customer Rescission Completion Timeline The revision will implement a written standard in the Retail.
Retail Market Update June 5, New meter is requested for a specific customer’s location. 2.Application is filed by customer and/or the customer’s.
Renewable Energy Credit (REC) Program ERCOT Retail 101.
1 TDTWG Update to RMS Wednesday March 11, Primary Activities 1.Reviewed ERCOT System Outages and failures 2.ERCOT update of browser support for.
Ambit Energy May 10, Page 2 Agenda Company Overview Customer Acquisition/Order Process Communications DNP Process Usage/Billing Challenges Q&A.
Retail Market Subcommittee Update to TAC Kathy Scott April 24,
ERCOT MARKET EDUCATION
Update to RMS June 2, RMGRR131 – Guidelines for Notification of Invoice Dispute – VOTE  The revision will align the Retail Market Guide with current.
RMS Update to TAC January 3, Goals Update ► Complete and improve SCR745, Retail Market Outage Evaluation & Resolution, implementation and reporting.
Profiling Working Group August 2, PWG Update Report By Ernie Podraza of Reliant Energy ERCOT PWG Chair for COPS Meeting August 22, 2006.
1 Presented to ERCOT Retail Market Subcommittee January 9, 2002 Profiling Working Group Darryl Nelson, Chair Load Profiling Operating Guides (LPOG)
ERCOT MARKET EDUCATION
Retail Market Subcommittee Update to COPS Kathy Scott July 16,
Retail Market Subcommittee June 9, 2010 Performance Measures 1st Quarter 2010 Transaction Comparison.
ERCOT MARKET EDUCATION Retail 101. Introductions, Roles and Responsibilities.
0 The Basics –There are 4 POLR customer classes: Residential, Small Non-Res. (
RMS Update to TAC January 8, Voting Items From RMS meeting on 12/10/2008  RMGRR069: Texas SET Retail Market Guide Clean-up – Section 7: Historical.
09/15/10 RMS RMS Market Reports – Recommendations Karen Farley Manager, Retail Customer Choice.
10/13/10 RMS RMS Market Reports – Recommendations Karen Farley Manager, Retail Customer Choice.
ESI IDs Retired in Error! RMS – August 10, 2005 Discussion.
1 RMS TAC Update April 3, Test Plan Flight Dates It is the practice of RMS to approved the dates for future testing flights. This enables new.
1 ESI ID SERVICE HISTORY AND USAGE DATA EXTRACT SYSTEM CHANGE REQUEST (SCR 727) February 24, 2003.
Load Profiling Working Group RMS Presentation 8/01/2002 by Ernie Podraza Reliant Energy Retail Group Chair PWG.
Retail Market Subcommittee Update to COPS Kathy Scott March 17,
1 RMS Update on Move-In / Move-Out Task Force November 14, 2002.
ERCOT MARKET EDUCATION Retail 101. Retail Transaction Processing.
RMS/COPS Workshop VI 1 October 06, Antitrust Admonition ERCOT strictly prohibits Market Participants and their employees who are participating in.
1 Linked-Service Address Discussion Thursday - April 8, 2004 (Updated 4/12/04 to include meeting results) Airport Hilton - Austin.
1 TDTWG Update to RMS Wednesday August 17, Primary Activities 1.Reviewed ERCOT System Outages and failures 2.Reviewed 2011 SLA 3.ERCOT presented.
01/17/ CP Discussion October 16,2002 Retail Market Subcommittee Austin, Texas.
Advanced Metering Rule Christine Wright Public Utility Commission of Texas June 6, 2007 Retail Market Workshop COMET WG Meeting.
1 Supporting materials for RMS Provided by Retail Customer Choice (RCC) team.
Distributed Renewable Generation Profile Implementation Plan.
ERCOT MARKET EDUCATION Retail 101. Introductions, Roles and Responsibilities.
Update to RMS August 4th, RMGRR129 – Revision to Customer Rescission Completion Timeline Timely execution of a customer rescission after completion.
Demand Response Task Force. 2 2 Outline  Overview of ERCOT’s role in the CCET Pilot  Overview of Stakeholder Process – What’s been done to date?  Questions.
ERCOT Service Availability Metrics and Retail Systems Update April 2007.
1 Market Operations Presentation Board of Director’s Meeting January 17, 2006.
December 9, 2015 Retail Market Subcommittee Update to COPS Kathy Scott January 13,
1 TX SET Mass Transition Project RMS Update March 15, 2006.
1 Supporting materials for RMS Follow up from April RMS presentation Expedited Switch/Customer Rescission (Retail Customer Choice Team)
Update to RMS December 18, Project(PR) 010_03 SCR756 Part B – High Level Timeline DRAFT:  Planning Phase: ~ (End of 2013) ◦ Business requirements.
Market Metrics Working Group RMS Update: June 13, 2007.
Electronic Outage Reporting Proof Of Concept Report July 8, 2002.
RXQ Customer-specific Information Request Process Flow Supplier submits a Customer-specific Information Request ( ) Distribution Company processes.
Update to RMS January 10, Project(PR) 010_03 SCR756 Part B – High Level Timeline DRAFT:  Planning Phase: ~ (End of 2013) ◦ Business requirements.
TX SET Update to RMS Wednesday, May 9, Elimination of the Drop to AREP o RULEMAKING TO AMEND COMMISSION SUBSTANTIVE RULES CONSISTENT WITH §25.43,
RMS Update to TAC November 1, RMS Activity Summary RMGRR057, Competitive Metering Working Group Name Change (VOTE) Update on RMS Working Group and.
Retail Market Subcommittee Update to TAC March 4, 2004.
MIMO Stacking Document and the current RMG are inconsistent with current logic and should be updated.
ERCOT MARKET EDUCATION Retail 101. Market Rules Overview Topics in this lesson...  Introduction to Market Rules Public Utility Regulatory Act PUCT Substantive.
Update to RMS October 6 th, RMGRR129 – Revision to Customer Rescission Completion Timeline – REMINDER Timely execution of a customer rescission.
1 TDTWG Update to RMS Wednesday May 6, Primary Activities 1.Reviewed ERCOT System Outages and Failures 2.Reviewed Service Availability 3.Reviewed.
MMWG Performance Measures Questionnaire. Performance Measure Reporting Requirements The reporting requirements allowed the commission to obtain information.
1 Customer Objections in Complete Status (CCO Clean-up Phase 3) Background Next Steps.
Mass Transition—Timelines & Volume Limitation RMGRR116—Acquisition Transfer Non-standard Metering Future Meetings 1.
1 Market Operations Presentation Board of Director’s Meeting August 16, 2005.
Module 1 From Bundled Utilities to Current Market Design.
1 RMS Update to RMWG June 6, Market Process for Solar & Wind Devices Retail customers are purchasing and installing wind and solar equipment on.
1 TX SET Update to RMS March 14, Drop to AREP Changes PUCT Project oOne of TX SET 2007 goal is to evaluate approved Rulemakings and determine.
Retail Market Subcommittee Update to COPS Kathy Scott January 14,
ERCOT MARKET EDUCATION
Retail Market Subcommittee Update to TAC
Settlement Timeline Workshop
Pro-Active Transaction Resolution Measures
Pro-Active Transaction Resolution Measures
Usage Billing Issues.
Presentation transcript:

1 TDTWG March 4, 2009 Performance Measures Overview

2 History of Performance Measures Performance Measures were initially created by the PUC to provide transparency into the transaction flows between market participants. There are three projects that have been used by the Commission for Performance Measures Reporting: –PUC Project – first Performance Measures Rule –PUC Project – second Performance Measures Rule – effective July 1, _UTILITY_TYPE=A&TXT_CNTRL_NO=33049http://interchange.puc.state.tx.us/WebApp/Interchange/application/dbapps/filings/pgControl.asp?TXT _UTILITY_TYPE=A&TXT_CNTRL_NO=33049 –PUC Project – Project to file Performance Measures – for filing _UTILITY_TYPE=A&TXT_CNTRL_NO=36141http://interchange.puc.state.tx.us/WebApp/Interchange/application/dbapps/filings/pgControl.asp?TXT _UTILITY_TYPE=A&TXT_CNTRL_NO=36141 The PUC rule defines what is to be reported. The Market Metrics Working Group worked together to create templates so the filing package of each participant is consistent in appearance. These documents are ERCOT management reports to the Commission. ERCOT provides a copy of company specific materials to market participants. Because of the confidential data contained in the report, reports to market participants go to one place, the Siebel Primary Contact.

3 Helpful Info Market participants, CR and TDSP, receive ERCOT reports. They have a responsibility to validate that the statistics are reasonable and are to file a dispute with the Commission if there is a material discrepancy. It should be understood that statistics may not match exactly. Because of reporting system designs, data may be slightly different. Timing also causes slight differences. ERCOT uses a weighted average in the calculation of protocol for the month and the quarter. One day may not make a dramatic swing in the percent in protocol from a total market perspective. CR and TDSP have requirements for their filings in the same rule.

4 Market Metrics Website Key Documents CR Template Template used by the CR for reporting Performance Measures for a quarter. (12/03/08,.xls, 46 KB)33049 CR Template Order PUC order adopting amendment to form for Performance Measures (12/03/08,.doc, 80.5 KB)33049 Order TDSP Template Template used by the TDSP to Report Performance Measures for a reporting quarter. (12/03/08,.xls, 46.5 KB)33049 TDSP Template Total Market Template Template used by ERCOT to report the performance for the market for a quarter. (12/03/08,.xls, 46.5 KB)33049 Total Market Template Market Metrics Working Group Procedures MMWG responsibilities and procedures for evaluating and recommending performance measures; May 11, 2004 (12/03/08,.doc, 60 KB)Market Metrics Working Group Procedures P.U.C. Filing Requirements #33049 Filing Requirements #33049 Performance Measures Reporting (12/03/08,.doc, KB)P.U.C. Filing Requirements #33049 TDSP Field Performance Final #33049 TDSP Performance Measures Reporting Template (12/03/08,.xls, 73 KB)TDSP Field Performance Final

5 ERCOT Performance Measures Reports filed with the PUC Attachments A 01- A 20 There are 19 or 20 Attachments filed by ERCOT with the Public Utility Commission of Texas by ERCOT each quarter. –Attachment A 01-Attestation (Legal Document required by the PUC for Performance Measures Reporting) –Attachment A 02-Analysis of Performance Measures Report 4Q08 Draft Doc. (Summary of the materials presented in A 12 through A 17 in narrative form ) –Attachment A 03 through A 05-PROTECTED INFORMATION--Active ESI IDs not with AREP as of.xls (Detail listing of the Competitive Retailers and the number of ESI Ids served by ESI ID type, with Demand and MWh) –Attachment A 06 through A 08- Estimated Usage of ESI IDs not with AREP as of.xls (Summary of material presented in A3 through A5 MWh) –Attachment A 09 through A 11 - Estimated Loads of ESI IDs not with AREP as of.xls (Summary of material presented in A3 through A5 Load) –Attachment A 12 - Total Market Report 4Q 2008.xls (Excel spreadsheet with detail data on number of transactions submitted by month and the percent in protocol)

6 ERCOT Performance Measures Reports filed with the PUC Attachments A 01- A 20 –Attachment A 13 - ERCOT IT Incident Market Notice Summary 4Q 08.xls (Detail of outages and system degradation; this is a cumulative report over a physical year) –Attachment A 14 through 16 - IT Service Availability Metrics.ppt by –(Power Point presentation that tracks the reliability of the ERCOT systems that process transactions and provide information to market participants. Separate report by month. ) –Attachment A 17 - PROTECTED INFORMATION - Unauthorized Changes 4Q 2008.xls –(Excel spreadsheet which tracks the number of unauthorized changes of REP for which each REP gained or lost customers during the reporting period, as well as the number of switches completed during the reporting period) –Attachment A 18 - PROTECTED INFORMATION - CR Summary.zip (Excel spreadsheet with detail data on number of transactions submitted by month and the percent in protocol for each Competitive Retailer) –Attachment A 19 - PROTECTED INFORMATION - TDSP - Summary.zip (Excel spreadsheet with detail data on number of transactions submitted by month and the percent in protocol for each Transmission/Distribution company) –Attachment A 20 - PROTECTED INFORMATION - CR_TDSP - Summary.zip (Excel spreadsheet with detail data on number of transactions submitted by month and the percent in protocol for each Competitive Retailer and Transmission/Distribution company)

7 Distribution of ERCOT Reports

8 TDTWG Preview

9 Related Materials to this Overview –Attachment A 02-Analysis of Performance Measures Report – Historical Number of Premises Switched (A 03 – A 11) –Attachment A 12–Total Market Report – ERCOT IT Incident Summary (A 13) – Service Availability Metrics (A 14 – A 16) –Public Report from MarkeTrak system (A 17 – Unauthorized Changes) – RMS_3Q_2008_PM_Comparison.ppthttp:// RMS_3Q_2008_PM_Comparison.ppt