Participation of and Accommodations for Students with Disabilities and English Language Learners NAEP State Analysis Project Jenifer Harr María Pérez CCSSO.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Baela Raza Jamil Zara Khan Zaheer Abbas PRESENTED AT: Comparative and International Education Society (CIES) – 10 th to 16 th March 2014 Effects of Parental.
Advertisements

Engagement By Design: Focus on Developmental Education Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2004 Findings.
11 Evaluating the NYC Core Knowledge Early Literacy Pilot: Year 3 Report Research and Policy Support Group February 2012.
Using Assessment Data to Improve Student Achievement Massachusetts Department of Education Dan Wiener, Coordinator of Assessment for Students with Disabilities.
1 Performance of English Language Learners on the 2008 Grades 3-8 ELA Tests David Abrams Assistant Commissioner for Standards, Assessment, and Reporting.
1 Academic Performance of English Language Learners on Grades 3-8 ELA Tests (2007 to 2009) David Abrams Assistant Commissioner Office of Standards, Assessment.
National Center on Educational Outcomes N C E O Leaving No Child Behind: Are English Language Learners With Disabilities Considered? Martha Thurlow, Jane.
Jason Altman – NCEO Mari Quenemoen – NAAC TASH Annual Conference – Nov. 19,
Meeting NCLB Act: Students with Disabilities Who Are Caught in the Gap Martha Thurlow Ross Moen Jane Minnema National Center on Educational Outcomes
Office of Assessment October 22, PSAT/SAT/NAEP  PSAT – Pre-Scholastic Aptitude Test  SAT – Scholastic Aptitude Test  NAEP – National Assessment.
Mark DeCandia Kentucky NAEP State Coordinator
Computer in Education Jiaying Zhao CSE 610 Western Oregon University.
Examining the Relation Between Anxiety, Depression, and Psychological Flexibility in Female Bhutanese Refugees Sheau-Yan Ho University of Vermont ACBS.
Real “Current” Spending Per Student and Student Achievement All data come from the Digest of Education Statistics, published by the National Center for.
1 Making the Case for Federal Support of the National Writing Project (An Evaluator’s Perspective) NWP Spring Meeting 2006 Inverness Research Associates.
CRIOP Professional Development: Program Evaluation Evaluatio Susan Chambers Cantrell, Ed.D. Pamela Correll, M.A. Victor Malo-Juvera, Ed.D.
Project MORE Independent Evaluation Completed by The Center for Evaluation Services Bowling Green State University Updated 11/12.
NYC ACHIEVEMENT GAINS COMPARED TO OTHER LARGE CITIES SINCE 2003 Changes in NAEP scores Class Size Matters August
Research Proposal Part II Creating a NAEP Teacher Questionnaire Ashley Singer ARE March 26, 2013.
Impact Analyses for VAM Scores The following slides show the relationship of the teacher VAM score with various classroom characteristics The observed.
© 2010 THE EDUCATION TRUST Raising Achievement and Closing Gaps Between Groups: Roles for Federal Policy.
What Was Learned from a Second Year of Implementation IES Research Conference Washington, DC June 8, 2009 William Corrin, Senior Research Associate MDRC.
Parent Notification for New and Continuing ESL Program Students School
California English Language Development Test CELDT Whittier Union high School District Federal & State Categorical Programs Office.
CCSSO Criteria for High-Quality Assessments Technical Issues and Practical Application of Assessment Quality Criteria.
Introduction to GREAT for ELs Office of Student Assessment Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction (608)
A Principled Approach to Accountability Assessments for Students with Disabilities CCSSO National Conference on Student Assessment Detroit, Michigan June.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Results of the 2005 National Assessment of Educational Progress.
Mark DeCandia Kentucky NAEP State Coordinator
NAEP 2011 Mathematics and Reading Results Challis Breithaupt November 1, 2011.
NAEP 2011 Mathematics and Reading Results NAEP State Coordinator Mark DeCandia.
2009 National Assessment of Educational Progress: National and State-Level Science Results JANUARY 25, 2011.
35th Annual National Conference on Large-Scale Assessment June 18, 2005 How to compare NAEP and State Assessment Results NAEP State Analysis Project Don.
Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics February 21, 2013.
Data-Driven Conversations with Special Education Teachers and Administrators to Improve Student Outcomes and State Accountability Emily Wolk Department.
Comparisons of independent schools across time: QCEA 2005, 2006, and 2007 Key assumptions Summary of Results Arabic: All students, and independent school.
1 National Center on Educational Outcomes What’s so Difficult About Including Special Education Teachers and Their Students in Growth Models Used to Evaluate.
Demographic Trends in Massachusetts Charter Schools Preliminary Analysis October 2015.
The Nation’s Report Card 4th-Grade Reading SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP),
State Practices for Ensuring Meaningful ELL Participation in State Content Assessments Charlene Rivera and Lynn Shafer Willner GW-CEEE National Conference.
The Use of Facebook Improve Motivation on English learning School: Southern Taiwan University Number:N99C0027 name: Candace Professor: Roger Yang.
Grades 3-8 Assessment Results. English Language Arts.
Tips and Guidelines. Chapter Four: Results Assessments Questionnaires/SurveysTest Scores/Report Card Data Rationale Why study is needed?What results will.
1 Grade 3-8 English Language Arts Results Student Growth Tracked Over Time: 2006 – 2009 Grade-by-grade testing began in The tests and data.
2009 Grade 3-8 Math Additional Slides 1. Math Percentage of Students Statewide Scoring at Levels 3 and 4, Grades The percentage of students.
NAEP 2007: Reading and Mathematics, Grades 4 and 8 New Jersey State Board of Education Work Session Assistant Commissioner Jay Doolan Assessment Director.
C R E S S T / U C L A UCLA Graduate School of Education & Information Studies Center for the Study of Evaluation National Center for Research on Evaluation,
STATEWIDE ASSESSMENT AND ACCOUNTABILITY: PROMOTION AND GRADUATION TESTS BY ISABELLA BROWN Emory University Summer 2006.
Family Engagement Engaging the families of your English learners in a partnership 1.
NAEP What is it? What can I do with it? Kate Beattie MN NAEP State Coordinator MN Dept of Education This session will describe what the National Assessment.
WIDA ACCESS Testing Information Session & Community Literacy Resources Parents as Educational Partners Tuesday, January 13, 2015 Jonathan Hudgens- WIDA.
NAEP Grade 12 Results.
Participants & Procedure
Connecticut Enhanced Assessment Grant
76% African American 14% Latino 9% Asian 1% White 51% Low-Income
assessing scale reliability
Assistant Commissioner Office of Standards, Assessment and Reporting
2017 TUDA NAEP Results for Miami-Dade
2017 NAEP RESULTS: DC PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOLS
Common Core Update May 15, 2013.
NAEP and PSAT Last updated: 08/20/09.
Laurene Christensen National Center for Educational Outcomes
Embargoed Official 2018 MCAS Results
Impact Analyses for VAM Scores
ECHOLS COUNTY MIDDLE SCHOOL April 12, 2016 Middle School Teachers
H Gary Cook, Ph.D., Associate Scientist WIDA Senior Director of Assessment 2/25/2019.
NAEP and PSAT Last updated: 08/20/09.
Why We Should be Skeptical about the Common Core
Mayra Perez, Ed. D. October 10, 2016
School Calendar Impact on Achievement
Presentation transcript:

Participation of and Accommodations for Students with Disabilities and English Language Learners NAEP State Analysis Project Jenifer Harr María Pérez CCSSO National Conference on Large- Scale Assessment June 2006

 Participation of and accommodations for students with disabilities (SDs) and English learners (ELs) have been a growing challenge over the past decade.  This study explores the relationships between changes in participation and accommodations and assessment results (e.g., state and NAEP assessments).  Data Sources CCSSO SSAP surveys from and NAEP SD/LEP Questionnaire from 1998 and 2002 NAEP test score results Background of the Study

1. How are changes in state assessment policies on the participation and accommodation of SDs and ELs related to changes in participation and accommodation rates on state assessments? 2. How are changes in NAEP participation and accommodation rates related to changes in state assessment participation and accommodation rates for SD and ELs? 3. How are differences between NAEP and state achievement trends related to changes in participation and accommodation rates? Research Questions

State Policy State identification policy State participation policy State accommodation policy State identification rate State participation rate State accommodation rate NAEP participation rate NAEP accommodation rate Difference between state and NAEP achievement gain NAEP achievement gain State Practice NAEP Practice NAEP and State Achievement Trends Policies and Practice for Assessing SDs and ELs

Research Question 1: How are changes in state policies related to changes in participation and accommodation rates on state assessments? State Policy State identification policy State participation policy State accommodation policy State identification rate State participation rate State accommodation rate NAEP participation rate NAEP accommodation rate Difference between state and NAEP achievement gain NAEP achievement gain State Practice NAEP Practice NAEP and State Achievement Trends

 States grouped by whether their accommodation policies changed between and  Group YY – States that had policy both years  Group NY – States that did not have policy in and did in  Group YN – States that had policy in and did not in  Group NN – States that did not have policy either year Research Question 1

 State Accommodation Policies and Participation Rates  SDs: The introduction of two of 30+ accommodation policies for SDs was related to greater increase in participation rates (extended testing time and use of scribe) (Comparing NY to YY)  ELs: The introduction of two of 17+ accommodation policies for ELs was related to greater increase in participation rates (explanation of directions and translations of directions) (Comparing NY to YY) Research Question 1

 State Accommodation Policies and Accommodation Rates  SDs: The introduction of accommodation policies for reading problems aloud and reading directions aloud appear to be related to higher increases in accommodation rates for students in grade 4 (Comparing NY to YY)  ELs: The introduction of an accommodation policy for extended testing time appear to be related to higher increases in accommodation rates for students in grade 4 (Comparing NY to NN) Research Question 1

Research Question 2: How are changes in NAEP participation and accommodation rates related to changes in state assessment participation and accommodation rates? State Policy State identification policy State participation policy State accommodation policy State identification rate State participation rate State accommodation rate NAEP participation rate NAEP accommodation rate Difference between state and NAEP achievement gain NAEP achievement gain State Practice NAEP Practice NAEP and State Achievement Trends

 State and NAEP Assessment Participation Rates  SDs: The average change in NAEP participation rates in grade 8 is significantly correlated with changes in state participation rates. In grade 4, it is not significant.  ELs: The average change in NAEP participation rates is not significantly correlated with changes in state participation rates in either grade. Research Question 2

 State and NAEP Accommodation Rates for SDs  Changes in overall state assessment accommodation rates are significantly correlated with changes in overall NAEP accommodation rates in grades 4 and 8.  Changes in state accommodation rates for the following state accommodations are significantly correlated to changes in overall NAEP accommodation rates:  Oral reading of directions, testing in small groups, extended testing time for grades 4 and 8  Oral reading of questions, interpretation of directions, and more breaks for grade 4 only Research Question 2

Research Question 3: How are differences in achievement trends related to changes in participation and accommodation rates? State Policy State identification policy State participation policy State accommodation policy State identification rate State participation rate State accommodation rate NAEP participation rate NAEP accommodation rate Difference between state and NAEP achievement gain NAEP achievement gain State Practice NAEP Practice NAEP and State Achievement Trends

 Comparing State and NAEP Assessment Results in Grade 4 to Change in Participation Rates of SDs on State Assessments Research Question 3

Summary of Findings: Summary of Findings: Policies and practice for assessing students with disabilities State Policy State identification policy State participation policy State accommodation policy State identification rate State participation rate State accommodation rate NAEP participation rate NAEP accommodation rate Difference between state and NAEP achievement gain NAEP achievement gain State Practice NAEP Practice NAEP and State Achievement Trends ** (-) ** Grade 8

 Lack of additional years or alignment of data limit analyses  State policy data source – the SSAP survey – has been discontinued  Other state policy data sources include the NCEO (SD) and CEEE (EL) Future Directions? NCEOxxxx CEEExx NAEP Readingxxx NAEP Mathxx